Test AES-GCM-SIV with OPENSSL_SMALL.
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16805 inadvertently restored the OPENSSL_SMALL condition in aead_test.cc. I probably handled some merge conflict wrong. Change-Id: I1b29fbd4a0a57d94cd8b5bddf7c81ae10063e2a8 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/35544 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ad9eee1628
commit
4a136ea005
@ -55,12 +55,10 @@ static const struct KnownAEAD kAEADs[] = {
|
|||||||
0},
|
0},
|
||||||
{"AES_256_GCM_NIST", EVP_aead_aes_256_gcm, "nist_cavp/aes_256_gcm.txt",
|
{"AES_256_GCM_NIST", EVP_aead_aes_256_gcm, "nist_cavp/aes_256_gcm.txt",
|
||||||
false, true, 0},
|
false, true, 0},
|
||||||
#if !defined(OPENSSL_SMALL)
|
|
||||||
{"AES_128_GCM_SIV", EVP_aead_aes_128_gcm_siv, "aes_128_gcm_siv_tests.txt",
|
{"AES_128_GCM_SIV", EVP_aead_aes_128_gcm_siv, "aes_128_gcm_siv_tests.txt",
|
||||||
false, false, 0},
|
false, false, 0},
|
||||||
{"AES_256_GCM_SIV", EVP_aead_aes_256_gcm_siv, "aes_256_gcm_siv_tests.txt",
|
{"AES_256_GCM_SIV", EVP_aead_aes_256_gcm_siv, "aes_256_gcm_siv_tests.txt",
|
||||||
false, false, 0},
|
false, false, 0},
|
||||||
#endif
|
|
||||||
{"ChaCha20Poly1305", EVP_aead_chacha20_poly1305,
|
{"ChaCha20Poly1305", EVP_aead_chacha20_poly1305,
|
||||||
"chacha20_poly1305_tests.txt", false, true, 0},
|
"chacha20_poly1305_tests.txt", false, true, 0},
|
||||||
{"XChaCha20Poly1305", EVP_aead_xchacha20_poly1305,
|
{"XChaCha20Poly1305", EVP_aead_xchacha20_poly1305,
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user