This stub returns an empty string rather than NULL (since some callers
might assume that NULL means there are no shared ciphers).
Change-Id: I9537fa0a80c76559b293d8518599b68fd9977dd8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7196
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The C implementation is still our existing C implementation, but slightly
tweaked to fit with upstream's init/block/emits convention.
I've tested this by looking at code coverage in kcachegrind and
valgrind --tool=callgrind --dump-instr=yes --collect-jumps=yes
(NB: valgrind 3.11.0 is needed for AVX2. And even that only does 64-bit AVX2,
so we can't get coverage for the 32-bit code yet. But I had to disable that
anyway.)
This was paired with a hacked up version of poly1305_test that would repeat
tests with different ia32cap and armcap values. This isn't checked in, but we
badly need a story for testing all the different variants.
I'm not happy with upstream's code in either the C/asm boundary or how it
dispatches between different versions, but just debugging the code has been a
significant time investment. I'd hoped to extract the SIMD parts and do the
rest in C, but I think we need to focus on testing first (and use that to
guide what modifications would help). For now, this version seems to work at
least.
The x86 (not x86_64) AVX2 code needs to be disabled because it's broken. It
also seems pretty unnecessary.
https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4346
Otherwise it seems to work and buys us a decent performance improvement.
Notably, my Nexus 6P is finally faster at ChaCha20-Poly1305 than my Nexus 4!
bssl speed numbers follow:
x86
---
Old:
Did 1554000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000536us (1553167.5 ops/sec): 24.9 MB/s
Did 136000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003947us (135465.3 ops/sec): 182.9 MB/s
Did 30000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1022990us (29325.8 ops/sec): 240.2 MB/s
Did 1888000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000206us (1887611.2 ops/sec): 30.2 MB/s
Did 173000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003036us (172476.4 ops/sec): 232.8 MB/s
Did 30000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1027759us (29189.7 ops/sec): 239.1 MB/s
New:
Did 2030000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000507us (2028971.3 ops/sec): 32.5 MB/s
Did 404000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000287us (403884.1 ops/sec): 545.2 MB/s
Did 83000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1001258us (82895.7 ops/sec): 679.1 MB/s
Did 2018000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000006us (2017987.9 ops/sec): 32.3 MB/s
Did 360000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001962us (359295.1 ops/sec): 485.0 MB/s
Did 85000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1002479us (84789.8 ops/sec): 694.6 MB/s
x86_64, no AVX2
---
Old:
Did 2023000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000258us (2022478.2 ops/sec): 32.4 MB/s
Did 466000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1002619us (464782.7 ops/sec): 627.5 MB/s
Did 90000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1001133us (89898.1 ops/sec): 736.4 MB/s
Did 2238000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000175us (2237608.4 ops/sec): 35.8 MB/s
Did 483000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001348us (482349.8 ops/sec): 651.2 MB/s
Did 90000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1003141us (89718.2 ops/sec): 735.0 MB/s
New:
Did 2558000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000275us (2557296.7 ops/sec): 40.9 MB/s
Did 510000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001810us (509078.6 ops/sec): 687.3 MB/s
Did 115000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1006457us (114262.2 ops/sec): 936.0 MB/s
Did 2818000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000187us (2817473.1 ops/sec): 45.1 MB/s
Did 418000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001140us (417524.0 ops/sec): 563.7 MB/s
Did 91000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1002539us (90769.5 ops/sec): 743.6 MB/s
x86_64, AVX2
---
Old:
Did 2516000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000115us (2515710.7 ops/sec): 40.3 MB/s
Did 774000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000300us (773767.9 ops/sec): 1044.6 MB/s
Did 171000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1004373us (170255.5 ops/sec): 1394.7 MB/s
Did 2580000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000144us (2579628.5 ops/sec): 41.3 MB/s
Did 769000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000472us (768637.2 ops/sec): 1037.7 MB/s
Did 169000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000320us (168945.9 ops/sec): 1384.0 MB/s
New:
Did 3240000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000114us (3239630.7 ops/sec): 51.8 MB/s
Did 932000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000059us (931945.0 ops/sec): 1258.1 MB/s
Did 217000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1003282us (216290.1 ops/sec): 1771.8 MB/s
Did 3187000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000100us (3186681.3 ops/sec): 51.0 MB/s
Did 926000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000071us (925934.3 ops/sec): 1250.0 MB/s
Did 215000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000479us (214897.1 ops/sec): 1760.4 MB/s
arm, Nexus 4
---
Old:
Did 430248 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000153us (430182.2 ops/sec): 6.9 MB/s
Did 115250 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000549us (115186.8 ops/sec): 155.5 MB/s
Did 27000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1030124us (26210.4 ops/sec): 214.7 MB/s
Did 451750 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000549us (451502.1 ops/sec): 7.2 MB/s
Did 118000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001557us (117816.6 ops/sec): 159.1 MB/s
Did 27000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1024263us (26360.4 ops/sec): 215.9 MB/s
New:
Did 553644 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000183us (553542.7 ops/sec): 8.9 MB/s
Did 126000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000396us (125950.1 ops/sec): 170.0 MB/s
Did 27000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000336us (26990.9 ops/sec): 221.1 MB/s
Did 559000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1001465us (558182.3 ops/sec): 8.9 MB/s
Did 124000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000824us (123897.9 ops/sec): 167.3 MB/s
Did 28000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1034854us (27057.0 ops/sec): 221.7 MB/s
aarch64, Nexus 6P
---
Old:
Did 358000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000358us (357871.9 ops/sec): 5.7 MB/s
Did 45000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1022386us (44014.7 ops/sec): 59.4 MB/s
Did 8657 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1063722us (8138.4 ops/sec): 66.7 MB/s
Did 350000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000074us (349974.1 ops/sec): 5.6 MB/s
Did 44000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1007907us (43654.8 ops/sec): 58.9 MB/s
Did 8525 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1042644us (8176.3 ops/sec): 67.0 MB/s
New:
Did 713000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000190us (712864.6 ops/sec): 11.4 MB/s
Did 180000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1004249us (179238.4 ops/sec): 242.0 MB/s
Did 41000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1005811us (40763.1 ops/sec): 333.9 MB/s
Did 775000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000719us (774443.2 ops/sec): 12.4 MB/s
Did 182000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003529us (181360.0 ops/sec): 244.8 MB/s
Did 41000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1010576us (40570.9 ops/sec): 332.4 MB/s
Change-Id: Iaa4ab86ac1174b79833077963cc3616cfb08e686
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7226
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some software #includes opensslconf.h which typically contains settings that we
put in opensslfeatures.h (a header name not in OpenSSL). Rename it to
opensslconf.h.
Change-Id: Icd21dde172e5e489ce90dd5c16ae4d2696909fb6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7216
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some consumers of connect BIOs connect them explicitly, and we already have the
BIO_ctrl hooked up.
Change-Id: Ie6b14f8ceb272b560e2b534e0b6c32fae050475b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7217
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit a3d9528e9e has a bug that could
cause counters to be reused if |$avx=2| were set in the AES-NI AES-GCM
assembly code, if the EVP interface were used with certain coding
patterns, as demonstrated by the test cases added in
a5ee83f67e.
This changes the encryption code in the same way the decryption code
was changed in a3d9528e9e.
This doesn't have any effect currently since the AES-NI AES-GCM code
has |$avx=0| now, so |aesni_gcm_encrypt| doesn't change the counter.
Change-Id: Iba69cb4d2043d1ea57c6538b398246af28cba006
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7193
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Taken from 6b2ebe4332e22b4eb7dd6fadf418e3da7b926ca4. These don't do anything
right now but are checked in unmodified to make diffs easier to see.
Change-Id: I4f5bdb7b16f4ac27e7ef175f475540c481b8d593
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7224
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OpenSSL upstream's SIMD assembly is rather complex. This pattern of update
calls should be sufficient to stress all the codepaths.
Change-Id: I50dea8351e4203b6b2cd9b23456eb4a592d31b5e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7223
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also avoid using "i" in X509_cert_verify as a loop counter, trust
outcome and as an error ordinal.
(Imported from upstream's a3baa171053547488475709c7197592c66e427cf)
Change-Id: I4b0b542ffacf7fa861c93c8124b334c0aacc3c17
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7222
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 402fb1896b2aab5cf887127bbce964554b9c8113)
Change-Id: I80c1f952085c8fc9062d3395f211a525151c404d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7219
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Also avoid using "i" in X509_cert_verify as a loop counter, trust
outcome and as an error ordinal.
(Imported from upstream's a3baa171053547488475709c7197592c66e427cf)
Change-Id: I492afdbaa5017bcf00a0412033cf99fca3fe9401
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7218
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
It is only used by |bn_div_rem_words|.
Change-Id: I57627091d8db5890d7fea34d8560897717008646
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7128
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Create a |bn_div_rem_words| that is used for double-word/single-word
divisions and division-with-remainder. Remove all implementations of
|bn_div_words| except for the implementation needed for 64-bit MSVC.
This allows more code to be shared across platforms and also removes
an instance of the dangerous pattern wherein the |div_asm| macro
modified a variable that wasn't passed as a parameter.
Also, document the limitations of the compiler-generated code for the
non-asm code paths more fully. Compilers indeed have not improved in
this respect.
Change-Id: I5a36a2edd7465de406d47d72dcd6bf3e63e5c232
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7127
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Callers of this function are not checking for the -1 result. Change
the semantics to match their expectations and to match the common
semantics of most other parts of BoringSSL.
Change-Id: I4ec537d7619e20e8ddfee80c72125e4c02cfaac1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7125
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Note that this structure has a weak pointer to the key, which was a
problem corrected in the AES-GCM code in
0f8bfdeb33. Also, it uses |void *|
instead of |const AES_KEY *| to refer to that key.
Change-Id: I70e632e3370ab27eb800bc1c0c64d2bd36b7cafb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7123
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BIO_FLAGS_MEM_RDONLY keeps the invariant.
(Imported from upstream's a38a159bfcbc94214dda00e0e6b1fc6454a23b78)
Change-Id: I4cb35615d76b77929915e370dbb7fec1455da069
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7214
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This change causes cipher_test to test the EVP cipher interfaces with
various chunk sizes and adds a couple of large tests of GCM. This is
sufficient to uncover the issue that would have been caused by a3d9528e,
had the AVX code been enabled.
Change-Id: I58d4924c0bcd11a0999c24a0fb77fc5eee71130f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7192
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(imported from upstream's 2b80d00e3ac652377ace84c51b53f51a1b7e1ba2)
Change-Id: Iee5a8d85d276033b6ac8bc9ac87e157916a1a29a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7212
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Calling SSL_shutdown while in init previously gave a "1" response,
meaning everything was successfully closed down (even though it
wasn't). Better is to send our close_notify, but fail when trying to
receive one.
The problem with doing a shutdown while in the middle of a handshake
is that once our close_notify is sent we shouldn't really do anything
else (including process handshake/CCS messages) until we've received a
close_notify back from the peer. However the peer might send a CCS
before acting on our close_notify - so we won't be able to read it
because we're not acting on CCS messages!
(Imported from upstream's f73c737c7ac908c5d6407c419769123392a3b0a9)
Change-Id: Iaad5c5e38983456d3697c955522a89919628024b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7207
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 4d6fe78f65be650c84e14777c90e7a088f7a44ce)
Change-Id: Id28e0d49da2490e454dcb8603ccb93a506dfafaf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7206
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
- bugfix: should not treat '--' as invalid domain substring.
- '-' should not be the first letter of a domain
(Imported from upstream's 15debc128ac13420a4eec9b4a66d72f1dfd69126)
Change-Id: Ifd8ff7cef1aab69da5cade8ff8c76c3a723f3838
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7205
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This depends on https://codereview.chromium.org/1730823002/. The bit was only
ever targetted to one (rather old) CPU. Disable NEON on it uniformly, so we
don't have to worry about whether any new NEON code breaks it.
BUG=589200
Change-Id: Icc7d17d634735aca5425fe0a765ec2fba3329326
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7211
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This imports a fix to x86gas.pl from upstream's
a98c648e40ea5158c8ba29b5a70ccc239d426a20. It's needed to get poly1305-x86.pl
working.
Confirmed that this is a no-op for our current assembly files.
Change-Id: I28de1dbf421b29a06147d1aea3ff3659372a78b3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7210
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change makes the AEAD and EVP code paths use the same code for
AES-GCM. When AVX instructions are enabled in the assembly this will
allow them to use the stitched AES-GCM implementation.
Note that the stitched implementations are no-ops for small inputs
(smaller than 288 bytes for encryption; smaller than 96 bytes for
decryption). This means that only a handful of test cases with longish
inputs actually test the stitched code.
Change-Id: Iece8003d90448dcac9e0bde1f42ff102ebe1a1c9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7173
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Otherwise we clobber things like -m32.
Change-Id: I9457e4b50dc3063643c31d19c7935276b8a312a1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7209
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See also upstream's 2966c2ec31e81187da3fbbe1499a6aa3acfd355f.
Change-Id: Iad0a0f11accb4fa2bd93667239dd7462f9fdbd7f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7180
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This removes chacha_vec_arm.S and chacha_vec.c in favor of unifying on
upstream's code. Upstream's is faster and this cuts down on the number of
distinct codepaths. Our old scheme also didn't give vectorized code on
Windows or aarch64.
BoringSSL-specific modifications made to the assembly:
- As usual, the shelling out to $CC is replaced with hardcoding $avx. I've
tested up to the AVX2 codepath, so enable it all.
- I've removed the AMD XOP code as I have not tested it.
- As usual, the ARM file need the arm_arch.h include tweaked.
Speed numbers follow. We can hope for further wins on these benchmarks after
importing the Poly1305 assembly.
x86
---
Old:
Did 1422000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000433us (1421384.5 ops/sec): 22.7 MB/s
Did 123000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003803us (122534.0 ops/sec): 165.4 MB/s
Did 22000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000282us (21993.8 ops/sec): 180.2 MB/s
Did 1428000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000214us (1427694.5 ops/sec): 22.8 MB/s
Did 124000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006332us (123219.8 ops/sec): 166.3 MB/s
Did 22000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1020771us (21552.3 ops/sec): 176.6 MB/s
New:
Did 1520000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000567us (1519138.6 ops/sec): 24.3 MB/s
Did 152000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1004216us (151361.9 ops/sec): 204.3 MB/s
Did 31000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1009085us (30720.9 ops/sec): 251.7 MB/s
Did 1797000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000141us (1796746.7 ops/sec): 28.7 MB/s
Did 171000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003204us (170453.9 ops/sec): 230.1 MB/s
Did 31000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1005349us (30835.1 ops/sec): 252.6 MB/s
x86_64, no AVX2
---
Old:
Did 1782000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000204us (1781636.5 ops/sec): 28.5 MB/s
Did 317000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001579us (316500.2 ops/sec): 427.3 MB/s
Did 62000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1012146us (61256.0 ops/sec): 501.8 MB/s
Did 1778000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000220us (1777608.9 ops/sec): 28.4 MB/s
Did 315000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1002886us (314093.5 ops/sec): 424.0 MB/s
Did 71000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1014606us (69977.9 ops/sec): 573.3 MB/s
New:
Did 1866000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000019us (1865964.5 ops/sec): 29.9 MB/s
Did 399000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001017us (398594.6 ops/sec): 538.1 MB/s
Did 84000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1005645us (83528.5 ops/sec): 684.3 MB/s
Did 1881000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000325us (1880388.9 ops/sec): 30.1 MB/s
Did 404000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000004us (403998.4 ops/sec): 545.4 MB/s
Did 85000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1010048us (84154.4 ops/sec): 689.4 MB/s
x86_64, AVX2
---
Old:
Did 2375000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000282us (2374330.4 ops/sec): 38.0 MB/s
Did 448000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001865us (447166.0 ops/sec): 603.7 MB/s
Did 88000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1005217us (87543.3 ops/sec): 717.2 MB/s
Did 2409000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000188us (2408547.2 ops/sec): 38.5 MB/s
Did 446000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001003us (445553.1 ops/sec): 601.5 MB/s
Did 90000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1006722us (89399.1 ops/sec): 732.4 MB/s
New:
Did 2622000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000266us (2621302.7 ops/sec): 41.9 MB/s
Did 794000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000783us (793378.8 ops/sec): 1071.1 MB/s
Did 173000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000176us (172969.6 ops/sec): 1417.0 MB/s
Did 2623000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000330us (2622134.7 ops/sec): 42.0 MB/s
Did 783000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000531us (782584.4 ops/sec): 1056.5 MB/s
Did 174000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000840us (173854.0 ops/sec): 1424.2 MB/s
arm, Nexus 4
---
Old:
Did 388550 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000580us (388324.8 ops/sec): 6.2 MB/s
Did 90000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003816us (89657.9 ops/sec): 121.0 MB/s
Did 19000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1045750us (18168.8 ops/sec): 148.8 MB/s
Did 398500 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000305us (398378.5 ops/sec): 6.4 MB/s
Did 90500 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000305us (90472.4 ops/sec): 122.1 MB/s
Did 19000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1043278us (18211.8 ops/sec): 149.2 MB/s
New:
Did 424788 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000641us (424515.9 ops/sec): 6.8 MB/s
Did 115000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001526us (114824.8 ops/sec): 155.0 MB/s
Did 27000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1033023us (26136.9 ops/sec): 214.1 MB/s
Did 447750 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000549us (447504.3 ops/sec): 7.2 MB/s
Did 117500 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001923us (117274.5 ops/sec): 158.3 MB/s
Did 27000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1025118us (26338.4 ops/sec): 215.8 MB/s
aarch64, Nexus 6p
(Note we didn't have aarch64 assembly before at all, and still don't have it
for Poly1305. Hopefully once that's added this will be faster than the arm
numbers...)
---
Old:
Did 145040 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1003065us (144596.8 ops/sec): 2.3 MB/s
Did 14000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1042605us (13427.9 ops/sec): 18.1 MB/s
Did 2618 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1093241us (2394.7 ops/sec): 19.6 MB/s
Did 148000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000709us (147895.1 ops/sec): 2.4 MB/s
Did 14000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1047294us (13367.8 ops/sec): 18.0 MB/s
Did 2607 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1090745us (2390.1 ops/sec): 19.6 MB/s
New:
Did 358000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000769us (357724.9 ops/sec): 5.7 MB/s
Did 45000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1021267us (44062.9 ops/sec): 59.5 MB/s
Did 8591 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1047136us (8204.3 ops/sec): 67.2 MB/s
Did 343000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000489us (342832.4 ops/sec): 5.5 MB/s
Did 44000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1008326us (43636.7 ops/sec): 58.9 MB/s
Did 8866 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1083341us (8183.9 ops/sec): 67.0 MB/s
Change-Id: I629fe195d072f2c99e8f947578fad6d70823c4c8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7202
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Most of the OPENSSL_armcap_P accesses in assembly use named constants from
arm_arch.h, but some don't. Consistently use the constants. The dispatch really
should be in C, but in the meantime, make it easier to tell what's going on.
I'll send this patch upstream so we won't be carrying a diff here.
Change-Id: I63c68d2351ea5ce11005813314988e32b6459526
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7203
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They won't be used as-is. This is just to make the diffs easier to see. Taken
from upstream's 4f16039efe3589aa4d63a6f1fab799d0cd9338ca.
Change-Id: I34d8be409f9c8f15b8a6da4b2d98ba3e60aa2210
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7200
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Add references for some cases where we have explicit permission from
authors to use their work. This is just to make things easy for us to
find.
Change-Id: I47dacc6a80f9d0c960c5b6713a8dc25e1a4e6f0b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7191
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Thanks to Gisle Vanem for pointing out that this code was broken and
could never have compiled. Since it has never worked, and thus has never
been used, remove it.
Change-Id: Ic274eaf187928765a809690eda8d790b79f939a5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7190
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
See OpenSSL df057ea6c8a20e4babc047689507dfafde59ffd6.
Change-Id: Ife10dc13ca335cd51434d7769ff85c6929f10226
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7172
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
While it's always safe to read |SSL_MAX_SSL_SESSION_ID_LENGTH| bytes
from an |SSL_SESSION|'s |session_id| array, the hash function would do
so with without considering if all those bytes had been written to.
This change checks |session_id_length| before possibly reading
uninitialised memory. Since the result of the hash function was already
attacker controlled, and since a lookup of a short session ID will
always fail, it doesn't appear that this is anything more than a clean
up.
BUG=586800
Change-Id: I5f59f245b51477d6d4fa2cdc20d40bb6b4a3eae7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7150
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
crypto/x509 parses the SPKI on-demand, so we weren't actually exercising the
SPKI code.
Change-Id: I2e16045bd35dbe04d4b8d8b45939c8885e09a550
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7161
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I switched up the endianness. Add some tests to make sure those work right.
Also tweak the DTLS semantics. SSL_get_read_sequence should return the highest
sequence number received so far. Include the epoch number in both so we don't
need a second API for it.
Change-Id: I9901a1665b41224c46fadb7ce0b0881dcb466bcc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7141
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Currently, we correctly refuse to parse version 0 multi-prime keys, but we
still parse version 1 two-prime keys. Both should be rejected.
I missed an additional clause in the spec originally. It seems otherPrimeInfos
is marked OPTIONAL not because it is actually optional, but because they wanted
the two RSAPrivateKey forms to share one definition. The prose rules following
the definition imply that otherPrimeInfos' presence is entirely determined by
the version:
* version is the version number, for compatibility with future
revisions of this document. It shall be 0 for this version of the
document, unless multi-prime is used, in which case it shall be 1.
Version ::= INTEGER { two-prime(0), multi(1) }
(CONSTRAINED BY
{-- version must be multi if otherPrimeInfos present --})
and:
* otherPrimeInfos contains the information for the additional primes
r_3, ..., r_u, in order. It shall be omitted if version is 0 and
shall contain at least one instance of OtherPrimeInfo if version
is 1.
Change-Id: I458232a2e20ed68fddcc39c4c45333f33441f70b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7143
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
That was probably more complexity than we needed. Nothing uses it
anymore, now that getting to the PKCS#8 logic isn't especially tedious.
Change-Id: I4f0393b1bd75e71664f65e3722c14c483c13c5cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6867
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
As with SPKI parsers, the intent is make EVP_PKEY capture the key's
constraints in full fidelity, so we'd have to add new types or store the
information in the underlying key object if people introduce variant key
types with weird constraints on them.
Note that because PKCS#8 has a space for arbitrary attributes, this
parser must admit a hole. I'm assuming for now that we don't need an API
that enforces no attributes and just ignore trailing data in the
structure for simplicity.
BUG=499653
Change-Id: I6fc641355e87136c7220f5d7693566d1144a68e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6866
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, OpenSSL supported many different DSA PKCS#8 encodings. Only
support the standard format. One of the workaround formats (SEQUENCE of
private key and public key) seems to be a workaround for an old Netscape
bug. From inspection, NSS seems to have fixed this from the first open
source commit.
Change-Id: I1e097b675145954b4d7a0bed8733e5a25c25fd8e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7074
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There are all the type-specific serializations rather than something
tagged with a type. i2d_PrivateKey's PKCS#8 codepath was unreachable
because every EVP_PKEY type has an old_priv_encode function.
To prune EVP_PKEY_ASN1_METHOD further, replace i2d_PrivateKey into a
switch case so we don't need to keep old_priv_encode around. This cuts
down on a case of outside modules reaching into crypto/evp method
tables.
Change-Id: I30db2eed836d560056ba9d1425b960d0602c3cf2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6865
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They're only used by a pair of PEM functions, which are never used.
BUG=499653
Change-Id: I89731485c66ca328c634efbdb7e182a917f2a963
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6863
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Many consumers need SPKI support (X.509, TLS, QUIC, WebCrypto), each
with different ways to set signature parameters. SPKIs themselves can
get complex with id-RSASSA-PSS keys which come with various constraints
in the key parameters. This suggests we want a common in-library
representation of an SPKI.
This adds two new functions EVP_parse_public_key and
EVP_marshal_public_key which converts EVP_PKEY to and from SPKI and
implements X509_PUBKEY functions with them. EVP_PKEY seems to have been
intended to be able to express the supported SPKI types with
full-fidelity, so these APIs will continue this.
This means future support for id-RSASSA-PSS would *not* repurpose
EVP_PKEY_RSA. I'm worried about code assuming EVP_PKEY_RSA implies
acting on the RSA* is legal. Instead, it'd add an EVP_PKEY_RSA_PSS and
the data pointer would be some (exposed, so the caller may still check
key size, etc.) RSA_PSS_KEY struct. Internally, the EVP_PKEY_CTX
implementation would enforce the key constraints. If RSA_PSS_KEY would
later need its own API, that code would move there, but that seems
unlikely.
Ideally we'd have a 1:1 correspondence with key OID, although we may
have to fudge things if mistakes happen in standardization. (Whether or
not X.509 reuses id-ecPublicKey for Ed25519, we'll give it a separate
EVP_PKEY type.)
DSA parsing hooks are still implemented, missing parameters and all for
now. This isn't any worse than before.
Decoupling from the giant crypto/obj OID table will be a later task.
BUG=522228
Change-Id: I0e3964edf20cb795a18b0991d17e5ca8bce3e28c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6861
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
