Change-Id: I84abfedc30e4c34e42285f3c366c2f504a3b9cf2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34144
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Unfortunately, this requires partially reverting
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31324. This is a mess.
While clang proper includes a fuzzer driver, Chromium doesn't use it.
Chromium builds exclusively with fuzzer-no-link and links to its own
copy of the fuzzer runtime[1]. As of [2], Chromium's clang (which we use
on bots) no longer includes the driver, so we must mimic them.
However, Chromium's setup is somewhat questionable because
fuzzer-no-link pulls in libclang_rt.fuzzer_no_main which still includes
most of libclang_rt.fuzzer, just not the one main function[3]. It
appears Chromium is actually linking two copies of
libclang_rt.fuzzer_no_main. Hopefully this mostly works out as Chromium's
clang and libFuzzer should be relatively aligned, but it's not a good
assumption for our build, which can take other Clangs too.
Thus, if you pass -DFUZZ=1 as-is, we will assume you are using a
"normal" Clang with all its relevant runtimes intact. If, however, you
are using Chromium clang, you must drop the matching libFuzzer where the
bots expected it and build with -DLIBFUZZER_FROM_DEPS=1.
This involves no changes to the bots because we never actually unwound
all the LIBFUZZER_FROM_DEPS bits before.
[1] https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/testing/libfuzzer/BUILD.gn?rcl=d21c49585f262e851e2984f96f52905782706325&l=14
[2] c79bf2ea4c
[3] 8ebc3668b0/lib/fuzzer/CMakeLists.txt (L93-L107)8ebc3668b0/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerMain.cpp
Change-Id: I946b3c821c3d7e6def7e07f1381f58241611ba3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34184
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
MakeConstSpan() takes size_t as the second argument, so protos_len ought to also be size_t.
Bug: chromium:879657
Change-Id: I93089ea20ce4b9c2b9d4d954dce807feb5341482
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34164
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Whether the host has a valid certificate or private key may depend on
the handshake parameters and not just its configuration. For example,
negotiating the delegated credential extension (see
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-subcerts) requires an
alternate private key for the handshake.
Change-Id: I11cea1d11e731aa4018d980c010b8d8ebaa64c31
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33664
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Bug: 181
Change-Id: Ica9299613d7fd1b803533b7e489b9ba8fe816a24
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33968
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Since libunwind, and therefore the CFI tests, are already optional,
might as well make pkg-config optional too.
(I'm not sure whether we actually want to support people using our
development build, but gRPC appear to be trying to do so:
https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/17638)
Change-Id: I16b4c53bd8a66933bc19fba29aed0d79ce2670c2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34124
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This one is easy. For others we may wish to get in the habit of pulling
assembly declarations into headers.
Bug: 181
Change-Id: I24c774e3c9b1f983585b9828b0783ceddd08f0e7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33967
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I hadn't thought that we still had the NIDs for these, but it appears
that we do. In which case, might as well set them.
Change-Id: I0d459ecacda95298c7ef345b73639cc02c74914f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34045
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This uses the x86 trap flag and libunwind to test CFI works at each
instruction. For now, it just uses the system one out of pkg-config and
disables unwind tests if unavailable. We'll probably want to stick a
copy into //third_party and perhaps try the LLVM one later.
This tester caught two bugs in P-256 CFI annotations already:
I47b5f9798b3bcee1748e537b21c173d312a14b42 and
I9f576d868850312d6c14d1386f8fbfa85021b347
An earlier design used PTRACE_SINGLESTEP with libunwind's remote
unwinding features. ptrace is a mess around stop signals (see group-stop
discussion in ptrace(2)) and this is 10x faster, so I went with it. The
question of which is more future-proof is complex:
- There are two libunwinds with the same API,
https://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/ and LLVM's. This currently uses the
system nongnu.org for convenience. In future, LLVM's should be easier
to bundle (less complex build) and appears to even support Windows,
but I haven't tested this. Moreover, setting the trap flag keeps the
test single-process, which is less complex on Windows. That suggests
the trap flag design and switching to LLVM later. However...
- Not all architectures have a trap flag settable by userspace. As far
as I can tell, ARMv8's PSTATE.SS can only be set from the kernel. If
we stick with nongnu.org libunwind, we can use PTRACE_SINGLESTEP and
remote unwinding. Or we implement it for LLVM. Another thought is for
the ptracer to bounce SIGTRAP back into the process, to share the
local unwinding code.
- ARMv7 has no trap flag at all and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP fails. Debuggers
single-step by injecting breakpoints instead. However, ARMv8's trap
flag seems to work in both AArch32 and AArch64 modes, so we may be
able to condition it on a 64-bit kernel.
Sadly, neither strategy works with Intel SDE. Adding flags to cpucap
vectors as we do with ARM would help, but it would not emulate CPUs
newer than the host CPU. For now, I've just had SDE tests disable these.
Annoyingly, CMake does not allow object libraries to have dependencies,
so make test_support a proper static library. Rename the target to
test_support_lib to avoid
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/17785
Update-Note: This adds a new optional test dependency, but it's disabled
by default (define BORINGSSL_HAVE_LIBUNWIND), so consumers do not need
to do anything. We'll probably want to adjust this in the future.
Bug: 181
Change-Id: I817263d7907aff0904a9cee83f8b26747262cc0c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33966
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Maybe someday we'll be able to turn on that warning. (The EVP_CIPHER
hooks take size_t while the functions took long.)
Change-Id: Ic4da44efca9419a7f703e232d3f92638eb4ab37a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34084
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Postgres contains a “pqcrypto” module that showcases the worst of 90's
crypto, including Blowfish and CAST5 in CFB, CBC, and ECB modes. (Also,
64-bit keys for both of those.)
In order to minimise the patching needed to build Postgres, put these
things in decrepit.
Change-Id: I8390c5153dd7227eef07293a4363878d79df8b21
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34044
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Unwind testing will make CHECK_ABI much slower. The original
ptrace-based design is some 10,000x slower. I've found an alternate
design that's a mere 1,000x slower, but this probably warrants being
more straightforward. It also removes the weirdness where NDEBUG
controlled which tests were run.
While it does mean we need to write some extra tests for p256-x86_64.pl,
we otherwise do not directly unit test our assembly anyway. Usually we
test the public crypto APIs themselves. So, for most files, this isn't
actually extra work.
Bug: 181
Change-Id: I7cbb7f930c2ea6ae32a201da503dcd36844704f0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33965
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Windows is sufficiently different from Linux that running tests under
SDE for Windows, particularly with the new ABI tests, is worthwhile.
Change-Id: I32c4f6de06b2e732ebb2c1492eb1766cae73c0e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34064
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Prior to 82639e6f we used thread-local data for the PRNG state. That
change switched to using a mutex-protected pool instead in order to save
memory in heavily-threaded applications.
However, the pool mutex can get extremely hot in cases where the PRNG is
heavily used. 8e8f2504 was a short-term work around, but supporting both
modes is overly complex.
This change moves back to the state of the prior to 82639e6f. The best
way to review this is to diff the changed files against '82639e6f^' and
note that the only difference is a comment added in rand.c:
https://paste.googleplex.com/4997991748337664
Change-Id: I8febce089696fa6bc39f94f4a1e268127a8f78db
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34024
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I don't believe we use this anymore. People using it should upgrade to a newer
NDK (or, worst case, download android-cmake themselves).
Change-Id: Ia99d7b19d6f2ec3f4ffe90795813b00480dc2d60
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34004
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The minimum versions are largely bogus, since we do not continuously test them.
Instead, we've been using Abseil's five year guidelines to decide when to rely
on tooling improvements. Document this.
Remove the note on how to build Ninja as that'll just get out of date. For
instance, they appear to support Python 3 when building now.
Explicitly call out that CMake 3.0 will be required next year (released June
2014). 3.0 is the minimum needed to distinguish Clang from AppleClang, without
which version checks on Clang don't work.
Also document that we require a C++11 compiler for more than just tests these
days.
Change-Id: I4e5766934edc1d69f7be01f48e855d400adfb5f2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33845
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
While gdb can figure it out, libunwind requires CFI directives to
unwind a leaf function, even though the directives are trivial.
Adding them matches what GCC outputs, and likely gdb has many
heuristics that less complex tools (e.g. profilers) may not.
Bug: 181
Change-Id: I25c72152de33109a29710a828aeb99c608dd0470
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33964
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was also caught by the in-progress unwind tester. There are two
issues here. First, .cfi_endproc must come after ret to fully cover the
function. More importantly, this function is confused about whether it
has a frame pointer or not.
It looks like it does (movq %rsp, %rbp), and annotates accordingly, but
it does not actually use the frame pointer. It cannot. $y4 is rbp and
gets clobbered immediately after the preamble!
Remove this instruction and align the CFI annotations with a
frame-pointer-less function.
Bug: 181
Change-Id: I47b5f9798b3bcee1748e537b21c173d312a14b42
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33947
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This was caught by in-progress work to test unwind information. It was
incorrect at two instructions: immediately before we jump to
.Lpoint_double_shortcut$x. This is needed because
ecp_nistz256_point_add$x tries to be clever about not unwinding the
stack frame in its tail call.
It's also unlikely that the SEH handlers in this file are correct at
this point, but that will be handled separately while overhauling
everything else here. (For Win64, probably the only ABI-compliant option
is to just properly unwind the stack frame. Without a custom handler,
Win64 unwind codes are very restrictive.)
Bug: 181
Change-Id: I9f576d868850312d6c14d1386f8fbfa85021b347
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33946
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ecp_nistz256_point_add_affine does not support the doubling case and,
unlike ecp_nistz256_point_add which does a tail call, computes the wrong
answer. Note TestPointAdd in the unit tests skips this case.
This works fine because we only use ecp_nistz256_point_add_affine for
the g_scalar term, which is fully computed before the p_scalar term.
(Additionally it requires that the windowing pattern never hit the
doubling case for single multiplication.)
But this is not obvious from reading the multiplication functions, so
leave a comment at the call site to point this out.
Change-Id: I08882466d98030cdc882a5be9e702ee404e80cce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33945
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The old points weren't even on the curve. I probably had no clue what I
was doing at the time when I generated them. Refresh them with a
checked-in generate script.
Change-Id: Ib4613fe922edcf45fc4ea49fc4c2cc23a9a2a9bd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33944
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
perlasm's bizarre mix of asm and perl indentation and clever editors always
mess me up.
Change-Id: Iac906a636207867939cc327b4c21b8a982abce29
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33844
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We switched from thread-local storage to a mutex-pool in 82639e6f53
because, for highly-threaded processes, the memory used by all the
states could be quite large. I had judged that a mutex-pool should be
fine, but had underestimated the PRNG requirements of some of our jobs.
This change makes rand.c support using either thread-locals or a
mutex-pool. Thread-locals are used if fork-unsafe buffering is enabled.
While not strictly related to fork-safety, we already have the
fork-unsafe control, and it's already set by jobs that care a lot about
PRNG performance, so fits quite nicely here.
Change-Id: Iaf1e0171c70d4c8dbe1e42283ea13df5b613cb2d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/31564
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This is all manual right now. Once we've added SEH tests, we can add support
for emitting these in x86_64-xlate.pl, probably based on MASM and Yasm's unwind
directives, and unify with CFI. (Sadly, NASM does not support these
directives.) Then we can push that upstream to replace the error-prone and
non-standard custom handlers.
Change-Id: I5a734fd494b7eaafab24a00e6df624bd03b37d43
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33785
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Win64 unwind tables place distances from the start of a function in
byte-wide values.
Change-Id: Ie2aad7f6f5b702a60933bd52d872a83cba4e73a9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33784
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Dear reader, I must apologize in advance. This CL contains the following:
- A new 256-line perlasm file with non-trivial perl bits and a dual-ABI
variadic function caller.
- C preprocessor gymnastics, with variadic macros and fun facts about
__VA_ARGS__'s behavior on empty argument lists.
- C++ template gymnastics, including variadic arguments, template
specialization, std::enable_if, and machinery to control template argument
deduction.
Enjoy.
This tests that our assembly functions correctly honor platform ABI
conventions. Right now this only tests callee-saved registers, but it should be
extendable to SEH/CFI unwind testing with single-step debugging APIs.
Register-checking does not involve anything funny and should be compatible with
SDE. (The future unwind testing is unlikely to be compatible.)
This CL adds support for x86_64 SysV and Win64 ABIs. ARM, AArch64, and x86 can
be added in the future. The testing is injected in two places. First, all the
assembly tests in p256-x86_64-test.cc are now instrumented. This is the
intended workflow and should capture all registers.
However, we currently do not unit-test our assembly much directly. We should do
that as follow-up work[0] but, in the meantime, I've also wrapped all of the GTest
main function in an ABI test. This is imperfect as ABI failures may be masked
by other stack frames, but it costs nothing[1] and is pretty reliable at
catching Win64 xmm register failures.
[0] An alternate strategy would be, in debug builds, unconditionally instrument
every assembly call in libcrypto. But the CHECK_ABI macro would be difficult to
replicate in pure C, and unwind testing may be too invasive for this. Still,
something to consider when we C++ libcrypto.
[1] When single-stepped unwind testing exists, it won't cost nothing. The
gtest_main.cc call will turn unwind testing off.
Change-Id: I6643b26445891fd46abfacac52bc024024c8d7f6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33764
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: Ie9825634f0f290aa3af0e88477013f62e2e0c246
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33724
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This function allows a client to send a TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate message.
Change-Id: I69935253795a79d65a8c85b652378bf04b7058e2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33706
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
In [1], section 5.1, an optimised re-encryption process is given. In the
code, this simplifies to not needing to rebuild the ciphertext at all.
Thanks to John Schanck for pointing this out.
[1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/1174.pdf
Change-Id: I807bd509e936b7e82a43e8656444431546e9bbdf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33705
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Valgrind's checking of uninitialised memory behaves very much like a
check for constant-time code: branches and memory indexes based on
uninitialised memory trigger warnings. Therefore, if we can tell
Valgrind that some secret is “uninitialised”, it'll give us a warning if
we do something non-constant-time with it.
This was the idea behind https://github.com/agl/ctgrind. But tricks like
that are no longer needed because Valgrind now comes with support for
marking regions of memory as defined or not. Therefore we can use that
API to check constant-time code.
This CL defines |CONSTTIME_SECRET| and |CONSTTIME_DECLASSIFY|, which are
no-ops unless the code is built with
|BORINGSSL_CONSTANT_TIME_VALIDATION| defined, which it isn't by default.
So this CL is a no-op itself so far. But it does show that a couple of
bits of constant-time time are, in fact, constant-time—seemingly even
when compiled with optimisations, which is nice.
The annotations in the RSA code are a) probably not marking all the
secrets as secret, and b) triggers warnings that are a little
interesting:
The anti-glitch check calls |BN_mod_exp_mont| which checks that the
input is less than the modulus. Of course, it is because the input is
the RSA plaintext that we just decrypted, but the plaintext is supposed
to be secret and so branching based on its contents isn't allows by
Valgrind. The answer isn't totally clear, but I've run out of time on
this for now.
Change-Id: I1608ed0b22d201e97595fafe46127159e02d5b1b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33504
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
At some point after GCC 7.3, but before 8.2, GCC enabled the SSE ABI by
default. However, if it isn't enabled, the vector intrinsics in HRSS
cannot be used. (See https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/17540.)
Note that the intrinsics used are SSE2, but that should be ok because
they are guarded by a run-time check. The compile-time check for __SSE__
just ensures that GCC will build the code at all. (SDE does not simulate
anything that doesn't have SSE2, however.)
Change-Id: If092a06a441ed9d38576ea30351b3b40693a3399
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33744
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
It's excessively complex to worry about leaving these few bits for
extensions. If we need to change things, we can spin a new curve ID in
TLS. We don't need to support two versions during the transition because
a fallback to X25519 is still fine.
Change-Id: I0a4019d5693db0f0f3a5379909d99c2e2c762560
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33704
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I'm working on a test harness to check our assembly correctly restores
callee-saved registers. It caught this.
While perlasm tries to smooth over the differences between Windows and SysV
ABIs, it does not capture the difference in xmm registers. All xmm registers
are volatile in SysV, while Windows makes xmm6 through xmm15 callee-saved.
Change-Id: Ia549b0f126885768f7fb330271a590174c483a3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33685
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I73bd495cf99bbc8a993a726b009d68e74c893420
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33684
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Seeing the following errors with GCC 6 on ARM:
crypto/hrss/hrss.c:212:12: error: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Werror=strict-prototypes]
static int vec_capable() { return CRYPTO_is_NEON_capable(); }
^~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/hrss/hrss.c: In function 'vec_capable':
crypto/hrss/hrss.c:212:12: error: old-style function definition [-Werror=old-style-definition]
Change-Id: Ice540e6d436b8ada1dbc494f1feca10efff11687
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33624
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12704 pushed it just too far
to the edge. Once we have an established SSL_SESSION, any modifications
need to either be locked or done ahead of time. Do it ahead of time.
session->is_server gives a suitable place to check and X509s are
ref-counted so this should be cheap.
Add a regression test via TSan. Confirmed that TSan indeed catches this.
Change-Id: I30ce7b757d3a44465b318af3c98961ff3667483e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33606
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Since the underlying operation is deterministic the confirmation hash
isn't needed and SXY didn't use it in their proof.
Change-Id: I3a03c20ee79645cf94b10dbfe654c1b88d9aa416
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33605
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Since we build Chrome with -mfpu=neon anyway, this isn't currently
needed. Additionally, I had included poly3_invert_vec in the assembly
but hadn't gotten around to wiring it up yet. That assembly referenced a
couple of functions in the C code that had been renamed. Surprisingly,
the NDK linker didn't have a problem with the undefined symbols since it
could statically find them to be unreachable.
But that isn't true everywhere. Some builds did fail because of the
undefined symbols although we're not sure what's different about them.
(Different NDK version perhaps?)
Change-Id: Ibac4724d24df05d6f6007499e1cd884e59889101
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33604
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This allows an application to obtain the current TLS 1.3 traffic secrets
for a connection.
Change-Id: I8ad8d0559caba266f74081441dea54b22da3db20
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33590
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We don't call it, so ship less code and reduce the number of places
where we must think about the bsaes -> aes_nohw fallback.
Bug: 256
Change-Id: I10ac2d70e18ec81e679631a9532c36d9edab1c6e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33586
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Just forbid it altogether, so we don't need to worry about a mess of
equipreferences.
Change-Id: I4921ff326c6047e50c075d4311dd42219bf8318e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33585
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Even if the vector code isn't used in hrss.c, it might call external
assembly that still requires alignment.
Change-Id: I11ceb88f96deec6b20883872030ca090506ca150
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33584
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I moved the |poly3_rand| code into a function and omitted to update a
|sizeof|.
Change-Id: I861fac4fe26ee3b5e5116d5cee71e64d9af9d175
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33564
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change includes support for a variant of [HRSS], a post-quantum KEM
based on NTRU. It includes changes suggested in [SXY]. This is not yet
ready for any deployment: some breaking changes, like removing the
confirmation hash, are still planned.
(CLA for HRSS's assembly code noted in b/119426559.)
[HRSS] https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/667.pdf
[SXY] https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1005.pdf
Change-Id: I85d813733b066d5c578484bdd248de3f764194db
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33105
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
See the IETF thread here:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg27292.html
In particular, although the original publication of RFC 5246 had a
syntax error in the field (the minimum length was unspecified), there is
an errata from 2012 to fix it to be non-empty.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2864
Currently, when empty, we implicitly interpret it as SHA1/*, matching
the server behavior in missing extension in ClientHellos. However that
text does not support doing it for CertificateRequests, and there is not
much reason to. That default (which is in itself confusing and caused
problems such as older OpenSSL only signing SHA-1 given SNI) was
because, at the time, there were concerns over making any ClientHello
extensions mandatory. This isn't applicable for CertificateRequest,
which can freely advertise their true preferences.
Change-Id: I113494d8f66769fde1362795fb08ff2f471ef31d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33524
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
