ssl3_send_client_key_exchange were wrongly reported
by ssl3_send_client_certificate() and
ssl3_check_cert_and_algorithm()
Change-Id: I244d3d871b6b4f75a188fd386d52ffc4335d1f9b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1460
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's a different handshake flow with more state machine coverage. We should
make sure to test the asynchronous version.
Change-Id: I0bb79ca7e6a86bd3cac66bac1f795a885d474909
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1454
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Didn't have coverage for abbreviated handshakes with NewSessionTicket. Also add
some missing resumeSession flags so the tests match the comments.
Change-Id: Ie4d76e8764561f3f1f31e1aa9595324affce0db8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1453
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also change MaxHandshakeRecordLength to 1 in the handshake coverage tests to
better stress the state machine.
Change-Id: I27fce2c000b3d4818fd2e9a47fb09d3f646dd1bd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1452
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Test all pairs of client and server version, except for the ones that require
SSLv3 client support in runner.go. That is, as yet, still missing.
Change-Id: I601ab49c5526cd2eb4f85d5d535570e32f218d5b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1450
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's not part of SSL_OP_ALL and is unused, so remove it. Add a test that
asserts the version check works.
Change-Id: I917516594ec5a4998a8316782f035697c33d99b0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1418
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(This change originally applied to 1.0.1. In the switch to 1.0.2, the
DTLS specific client processing was removed and now the s3_clnt.c
functions are used. This caused most of the patch to be moot. What
remains is still useful however. For the original patch, see the change
against 1.0.1: 88ae012c8092852f03c50f6461175271104b4c8a)
CVE-2014-3510
Reviewed-by: Dr. Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 1d7d0ed9c21403d79d602b6c7d76fdecf5e737da)
Change-Id: I666f9c48d603f2366cab821ae446a57360c3026b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1439
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CVE-2014-3509
(Imported from upstream's 92aa73bcbfad44f9dd7997ae51537ac5d7dc201e)
Change-Id: Ibc681897251081ae5ebfea0ff6ca9defd73fe0f5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1441
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In a couple of functions, a sequence number would be calculated twice.
Additionally, in |dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message|, we know that
|frag_len| <= |msg_hdr->msg_len| so the later tests for |frag_len <
msg_hdr->msg_len| can be more clearly written as |frag_len !=
msg_hdr->msg_len|, since that's the only remaining case.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's d345a24569edf0a966b3d6eaae525f0ca4c5e570)
Change-Id: I038f9f01a1d9379f1ee058b231d80e8b9ce6c2d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1438
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Applying same fix as in dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message. A truncated
DTLS fragment would cause *ok to be clear, but the return value would
still be the number of bytes read.
Problem identified by Emilia Käsper, based on previous issue/patch by Adam
Langley.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 3d5dceac430d7b9b273331931d4d2303f5a2256f)
Change-Id: Ibe30716266e2ee1489c98b922cf53edda096c23c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1437
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, a truncated DTLS fragment in
|dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message| would cause *ok to be cleared, but
the return value would still be the number of bytes read. This would
cause |dtls1_get_message| not to consider it an error and it would
continue processing as normal until the calling function noticed that
*ok was zero.
I can't see an exploit here because |dtls1_get_message| uses
|s->init_num| as the length, which will always be zero from what I can
see.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's aad61c0a57a3b6371496034db61675abcdb81811.)
Change-Id: I2fb0ea93b6e812e19723ada3351f842cc7b2fa91
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1436
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The |pqueue_insert| function can fail if one attempts to insert a
duplicate sequence number. When handling a fragment of an out of
sequence message, |dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message| would not call
|dtls1_reassemble_fragment| if the fragment's length was zero. It would
then allocate a fresh fragment and attempt to insert it, but ignore the
return value, leaking the fragment.
This allows an attacker to exhaust the memory of a DTLS peer.
Fixes CVE-2014-3507
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 8ca4c4b25e050b881f3aad7017052842b888722d.)
Change-Id: I387e3f6467a0041f6367965ed3c1ad4377b9ac08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1435
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In |dtls1_reassemble_fragment|, the value of
|msg_hdr->frag_off+frag_len| was being checked against the maximum
handshake message size, but then |msg_len| bytes were allocated for the
fragment buffer. This means that so long as the fragment was within the
allowed size, the pending handshake message could consume 16MB + 2MB
(for the reassembly bitmap). Approx 10 outstanding handshake messages
are allowed, meaning that an attacker could consume ~180MB per DTLS
connection.
In the non-fragmented path (in |dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message|), no
check was applied.
Fixes CVE-2014-3506
Wholly based on patch by Adam Langley with one minor amendment.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 0598468fc04fb0cf2438c4ee635b587aac1bcce6)
Change-Id: I4849498eabb45ec973fcb988d639b23145891e25
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1434
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The |item| variable, in both of these cases, may contain a pointer to a
|pitem| structure within |s->d1->buffered_messages|. It was being freed
in the error case while still being in |buffered_messages|. When the
error later caused the |SSL*| to be destroyed, the item would be double
freed.
Thanks to Wah-Teh Chang for spotting that the fix in 1632ef74 was
inconsistent with the other error paths (but correct).
Fixes CVE-2014-3505
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 49850075555893c9c60d5b981deb697f3b9515ea)
Change-Id: Ie40007184f6194ba032b4213c18d36254e80aaa6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1432
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
When the write size was exactly SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH+1 and record
splitting is needed, an extra byte would be added to the max size of the
message to be written. This would cause the requested size to not exceed
the max. If the SSL_WANT_WRITE error were returned, the next packet
would not get the extra byte added to the max packet size since
record_split_done is set. Since a different set of arguments
(SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH+1 vs SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH) would be passed
to do_ssl3_write, it would return an "SSL3_WRITE_PENDING:bad write
retry" error.
To avoid a failure in the opposite direction, the max variable increment
is removed as well. This can happen when SSL_MODE_ENABLE_PARTIAL_WRITE
is not enabled and the call to ssl3_write_bytes contains, e.g., a buffer
of 2*SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH, where the first call into do_ssl3_write
succeeds writing the first SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH bytes, but writing
the second SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH bytes fails. This means the first
time the the second section of SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH bytes has called
do_ssl3_write with "max" bytes, but next call to ssl3_write_bytes in
turn calls into do_ssl3_write with "max+1" bytes.
Change-Id: Icf8453195c1145a54d31b8e8146801118207df03
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1420
Reviewed-by: Kenny Root <kroot@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Avoid needing to manually increment the reference count and using the right
lock, both here and in Chromium.
Change-Id: If116ebc224cfb1c4711f7e2c06f1fd2c97af21dd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1415
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reference counting should be internal to the type, otherwise callers need to
know which lock to use.
Change-Id: If4d805876a321ef6dece115c805e605584ff311e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1414
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Add a framework for testing the asynchronous codepath. Move some handshake
state machine coverage tests to cover a range of record-layer and
handshake-layer asynchronicity.
This adds tests for the previous two async bugs fixed.
Change-Id: I422ef33ba3eeb0ad04766871ed8bc59b677b169e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1410
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Any ssl3_get_* function that takes ownership of something before the
ssl_get_message call can't early-return without cleanup work.
This fixes valgrind on ClientAuth-Server-Async.
Change-Id: Ie7f0b37cac4d4bb7e06c00bae091fee0386c22da
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1413
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
- DTLS server code didn't account for the new ClientHello state. This looks
like it only matters if a DTLS server uses select_certificate_cb and returns
asynchronously.
- State A transitions immediately to B and is redundant. No code distinguishes
A and B.
- The ssl_get_message call transitions to the second state (originally C). This
makes the explicit transition to C a no-op. More of a problem,
ssl_get_message may return asynchronously and remain in its second state if the
handshake body had not completed yet. Fix this by splitting state C in two.
Combined with the above change, this results in only the top few states getting
reshuffled.
This fixes the server async tests.
Change-Id: I46703bcd205988b118217b6424ba4f88e731be5a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1412
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
With the removal of the freelist itself, these macros are
superfluous. Remove them in favore of OPENSSL_malloc and OPENSSL_free.
Change-Id: I4bfeff8ea087b9e16c7c32d7c1bdb7a07e7dd03e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1389
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The memory freelist maintained by OpenSSL claims to be a performance
optimization for platforms that have a slow malloc/free
implementation. This should not be the case on modern
linux/glibc. Remove the freelist as it poses a potential security
hazard of buffer-reuse that is of "initialized" memory that will not
be caught be tools such as valgrind.
Change-Id: I3cfa6a05f9bdfbbba7820060bae5a673dee43014
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1385
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The code guarded by PKCS1_CHECK appears to be unhelpful, and the guard
is explicitly undefined in ssl_locl.h Remove both.
Change-Id: I3cd45a744a8f35b02181b1e48fd1ef11af5e6f4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1383
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Use it to test DHE-RSA in BoringSSL.
Change-Id: I88f7bfa76507a6f60234d61d494c9f94b7df4e0a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1377
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Default to the number of CPUs. Avoids the tests launching 64 valgrinds in
parallel on machines without gobs of memory.
Change-Id: I9eeb365b48aa7407e303d161f90ce69a591a884c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1375
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Assert that inappropriate fallbacks are detected, but if the client_version
matches the server's highest version, do not abort the handshake.
Change-Id: I9d72570bce45e1eb23fc2b74a3c5fca10562e573
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1373
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Should have test coverage there as long as we care about supporting it.
Change-Id: Ic67539228b550f2ebd0b543d5a58640913b0474b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1371
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A modern TLS library without full support for TLS does not make sense.
Change-Id: I032537d1412f6e4effc9a2dd47123baf0084b4c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1382
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OPENSSL_NO_CAMELLIA has already been effectively defined, including in
opensslfeatures.h. This commit removes the last ifdef-protected code
guarded by OPENSSL_NO_CAMELLIA.
Change-Id: I58dc79dbe7a77843a641d9216f40f1d7d63fcc40
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1380
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's not built. The problem is worked around by the padding extension now.
Change-Id: If577efdae57d1bca4e0a626486fc0502c3567ebb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1374
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change marks public symbols as dynamically exported. This means
that it becomes viable to build a shared library of libcrypto and libssl
with -fvisibility=hidden.
On Windows, one not only needs to mark functions for export in a
component, but also for import when using them from a different
component. Because of this we have to build with
|BORINGSSL_IMPLEMENTATION| defined when building the code. Other
components, when including our headers, won't have that defined and then
the |OPENSSL_EXPORT| tag becomes an import tag instead. See the #defines
in base.h
In the asm code, symbols are now hidden by default and those that need
to be exported are wrapped by a C function.
In order to support Chromium, a couple of libssl functions were moved to
ssl.h from ssl_locl.h: ssl_get_new_session and ssl_update_cache.
Change-Id: Ib4b76e2f1983ee066e7806c24721e8626d08a261
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1350
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium is no longer using it.
Change-Id: If56340627d2024ff3fb8561405dd0cfc6f4787cb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1346
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Use same logic when determining when to expect a client certificate for
both TLS and DTLS.
PR#3452
(Imported from upstream's 666a597ffb9bcf3ba2d49e711fcca28df91eff9d)
Change-Id: Ia267255a32c0b3b9a7da1c53f13ef6f620ff5ec1
One of the state transitions wasn't rewritten to CR_CHANGE. Add a test to
exercise this codepath. Also SSL_cutthrough_complete references the state.
Change-Id: Ib2f7ac5ac3f0348864efa93cf13cfd87454572f0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1337
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
