These symbols can show up in lists of large symbols but, so I
understand, these lists might not include the filename path. Thus |base|
as a symbol name is rather unhelpful.
This change renames the two precomputated tables to have slightly more
greppable names.
Change-Id: I77059250cfce4fa9eceb64e260b45db552b63255
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6813
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
rsa_default_encrypt allowed an RSA modulus 8 times larger than the
intended maximum size due to bits vs. bytes confusion.
Further, as |rsa_default_encrypt| got this wrong while
|rsa_default_verify_raw| got it right, factor out the duplicated logic
so that such inconsistencies are less likely to occur.
BUG=576856
Change-Id: Ic842fadcbb3b140d2ba4295793457af2b62d9444
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6900
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some build systems don't like two targets with the same base name and
the curve25519 code had x25519-x86_64.[Sc].
Change-Id: If8382eb84996d7e75b34b28def57829d93019cff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6878
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit 2b0180c37fa6ffc48ee40caa831ca398b828e680 attempted to do this but
only hit one of many BN_mod_exp codepaths. Fix remaining variants and
add a test for each method.
Thanks to Hanno Boeck for reporting this issue.
(Imported from upstream's 44e4f5b04b43054571e278381662cebd3f3555e6.)
Change-Id: Ic691b354101c3e9c3565300836fb6d55c6f253ba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6820
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There is some messiness around saving and restoring the CBB, but this is
still significantly clearer.
Note that the BUF_MEM_grow line is gone in favor of a fixed CBB like the
other functions ported thus far. This line was never necessary as
init_buf is initialized to 16k and none of our key exchanges get that
large. (The largest one can get is DHE_RSA. Even so, it'd take a roughly
30k-bit DH group with a 30k-bit RSA key.)
Having such limits and tight assumptions on init_buf's initial size is
poor (but on par for the old code which usually just blindly assumed the
message would not get too large) and the size of the certificate chain
is much less obviously bounded, so those BUF_MEM_grows can't easily go.
My current plan is convert everything but those which legitimately need
BUF_MEM_grow to CBB, then atomically convert the rest, remove init_buf,
and switch everything to non-fixed CBBs. This will hopefully also
simplify async resumption. In the meantime, having a story for
resumption means the future atomic change is smaller and, more
importantly, relieves some complexity budget in the ServerKeyExchange
code for adding Curve25519.
Change-Id: I1de6af9856caaed353453d92a502ba461a938fbd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6770
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This relieves some complexity budget for adding Curve25519 to this
code.
This also adds a BN_bn2cbb_padded helper function since this seems to be a
fairly common need.
Change-Id: Ied0066fdaec9d02659abd6eb1a13f33502c9e198
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6767
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This assembly is in gas syntax so is not built on Windows nor when
OPENSSL_SMALL is defined.
Change-Id: I1050cf1b16350fd4b758e4c463261b30a1b65390
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6782
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These will be needed when we start writing variable-length things to a
CBB.
Change-Id: Ie7b9b140f5f875b43adedc8203ce9d3f4068dfea
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6764
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A lot of commented-out code we haven't had to put them back, so these
can go now. Also remove the TODO about OAEP having a weird API. The API
is wrong, but upstream's shipped it with the wrong API, so that's what
it is now.
Change-Id: I7da607cf2d877cbede41ccdada31380f812f6dfa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6763
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There was a TODO to remove it once asn1_mac.h was trimmed. This has now
happened. Remove it and reset error codes for crypto/asn1.
Change-Id: Iaf2f3e75741914415372939471b135618910f95d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6761
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The function X509_verify_cert checks the value of |ctx->chain| at the
beginning, and if it is NULL then it initialises it, along with the value
of |ctx->untrusted|. The normal way to use X509_verify_cert() is to first
call X509_STORE_CTX_init(); then set up various parameters etc; then call
X509_verify_cert(); then check the results; and finally call
X509_STORE_CTX_cleanup(). The initial call to X509_STORE_CTX_init() sets
|ctx->chain| to NULL. The only place in the OpenSSL codebase where
|ctx->chain| is set to anything other than a non NULL value is in
X509_verify_cert itself. Therefore the only ways that |ctx->chain| could be
non NULL on entry to X509_verify_cert is if one of the following occurs:
1) An application calls X509_verify_cert() twice without re-initialising
in between.
2) An application reaches inside the X509_STORE_CTX structure and changes
the value of |ctx->chain| directly.
With regards to the second of these, we should discount this - it should
not be supported to allow this.
With regards to the first of these, the documentation is not exactly
crystal clear, but the implication is that you must call
X509_STORE_CTX_init() before each call to X509_verify_cert(). If you fail
to do this then, at best, the results would be undefined.
Calling X509_verify_cert() with |ctx->chain| set to a non NULL value is
likely to have unexpected results, and could be dangerous. This commit
changes the behaviour of X509_verify_cert() so that it causes an error if
|ctx->chain| is anything other than NULL (because this indicates that we
have not been initialised properly). It also clarifies the associated
documentation.
(Imported from upstream's 692f07c3e0c04180b56febc2feb57cd94395a7a2.)
Change-Id: I971f1a305f12bbf9f4ae955313d5557368f0d374
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6760
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This check was fixed a while ago, but it could have been much simpler.
In the RSA key exchange, the expected size of the output is known, making the
padding check much simpler. There isn't any use in exporting the more general
RSA_message_index_PKCS1_type_2. (Without knowing the expected size, any
integrity check or swap to randomness or other mitigation is basically doomed
to fail.)
Verified with the valgrind uninitialized memory trick that we're still
constant-time.
Also update rsa.h to recommend against using the PKCS#1 v1.5 schemes.
Thanks to Ryan Sleevi for the suggestion.
Change-Id: I4328076b1d2e5e06617dd8907cdaa702635c2651
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6613
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We should reject RSA public keys with exponents of less than 3.
This change also rejects even exponents, although the usefulness
of such a public key is somewhat questionable.
BUG=chromium:541257
Change-Id: I1499e9762ba40a7cf69155d21d55bc210cd6d273
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6710
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OPENSSL_SMALL will still cause the smaller base-point table to be used
and so won't be as fast at signing as the full version, but Ed25519 will
now work in those builds.
Without OPENSSL_SMALL:
Did 20000 Ed25519 key generation operations in 1008347us (19834.4 ops/sec)
Did 20000 Ed25519 signing operations in 1025594us (19500.9 ops/sec)
Did 6138 Ed25519 verify operations in 1001712us (6127.5 ops/sec)
Did 21000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 1019237us (20603.6 ops/sec)
Did 7095 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 1065986us (6655.8 ops/sec)
With (on the same machine):
Did 8415 Ed25519 key generation operations in 1020958us (8242.3 ops/sec)
Did 8952 Ed25519 signing operations in 1077635us (8307.1 ops/sec)
Did 6358 Ed25519 verify operations in 1047533us (6069.5 ops/sec)
Did 6620 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 1008922us (6561.5 ops/sec)
Did 7183 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 1096285us (6552.1 ops/sec)
Change-Id: Ib443c0e2bdfd11e044087e66efd55b651a5667e7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6772
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This removes 16k from a release-mode build of the bssl tool. Now that we've
finished the AEAD refactor, there's no use in keeping this around as a
prototype for "stateful AEADs".
Before:
Did 2264000 RC4-MD5 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000430us (2263026.9 ops/sec): 36.2 MB/s
Did 266000 RC4-MD5 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000984us (265738.5 ops/sec): 358.7 MB/s
Did 50000 RC4-MD5 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1014209us (49299.5 ops/sec): 403.9 MB/s
After:
Did 1895000 RC4-MD5 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000239us (1894547.2 ops/sec): 30.3 MB/s
Did 199000 RC4-MD5 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001361us (198729.5 ops/sec): 268.3 MB/s
Did 39000 RC4-MD5 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1014832us (38430.0 ops/sec): 314.8 MB/s
There is a non-trivial performance hit, but this cipher doesn't matter much and
the stitched mode code reaches into MD5_CTX and RC4_KEY in somewhat unfortunate
ways.
Change-Id: I9ecd28d6afb54e90ce61baecc641742af2ae6269
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6752
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We can reuse the HMAC_CTX that stores the key. The API is kind of unfortunate
as, in principle, it should be possible to do an allocation-averse HMAC with a
shared key on multiple threads at once (EVP_AEAD_CTX is normally logically
const). At some point it may be worth rethinking those APIs somewhat. But
these "stateful AEADs" are already stateful in their EVP_CIPHER_CTX, so this is
fine.
Each cipher was run individually to minimize the effect of other ciphers doing
their mallocs. (Although the cost of a malloc is presumably going to depend a
lot on the malloc implementation and what's happened before in the process, so
take these numbers with a bucket of salt. They vary widely even with the same
arguments.)
Taking malloc out of seal/open also helps with the malloc tests. DTLS currently
cannot distinguish a malloc failure (should be fatal) from a decryption failure
(not fatal), so the malloc tests get stuck. But this doesn't completely get us
there since tls_cbc.c mallocs. This also assumes EVP_CIPHER_CTX, EVP_MD_CTX,
and HMAC_CTX are all clever about reusing their allocations when reset (which
they are).
Before:
Did 1315000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000087us (1314885.6 ops/sec): 21.0 MB/s
Did 181000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1004918us (180114.2 ops/sec): 243.2 MB/s
Did 34000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1024250us (33195.0 ops/sec): 271.9 MB/s
After:
Did 1766000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000319us (1765436.8 ops/sec): 28.2 MB/s
Did 187000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1004002us (186254.6 ops/sec): 251.4 MB/s
Did 35000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1014885us (34486.7 ops/sec): 282.5 MB/s
Before:
Did 391000 DES-EDE3-CBC-SHA1 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000038us (390985.1 ops/sec): 6.3 MB/s
Did 16000 DES-EDE3-CBC-SHA1 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1060226us (15091.1 ops/sec): 20.4 MB/s
Did 2827 DES-EDE3-CBC-SHA1 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1035971us (2728.8 ops/sec): 22.4 MB/s
After:
Did 444000 DES-EDE3-CBC-SHA1 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1001814us (443196.0 ops/sec): 7.1 MB/s
Did 17000 DES-EDE3-CBC-SHA1 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1042535us (16306.4 ops/sec): 22.0 MB/s
Did 2590 DES-EDE3-CBC-SHA1 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1012378us (2558.3 ops/sec): 21.0 MB/s
Before:
Did 1316000 AES-256-CBC-SHA1 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000510us (1315329.2 ops/sec): 21.0 MB/s
Did 157000 AES-256-CBC-SHA1 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1002944us (156539.1 ops/sec): 211.3 MB/s
Did 29000 AES-256-CBC-SHA1 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1030284us (28147.6 ops/sec): 230.6 MB/s
After:
Did 1645000 AES-256-CBC-SHA1 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000313us (1644485.3 ops/sec): 26.3 MB/s
Did 162000 AES-256-CBC-SHA1 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003060us (161505.8 ops/sec): 218.0 MB/s
Did 36000 AES-256-CBC-SHA1 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1014819us (35474.3 ops/sec): 290.6 MB/s
Before:
Did 1435000 RC4-SHA1 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000245us (1434648.5 ops/sec): 23.0 MB/s
Did 207000 RC4-SHA1 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1004675us (206036.8 ops/sec): 278.1 MB/s
Did 38000 RC4-SHA1 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1022712us (37156.1 ops/sec): 304.4 MB/s
After:
Did 1853000 RC4-SHA1 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000433us (1852198.0 ops/sec): 29.6 MB/s
Did 206000 RC4-SHA1 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1002370us (205512.9 ops/sec): 277.4 MB/s
Did 42000 RC4-SHA1 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1024209us (41007.3 ops/sec): 335.9 MB/s
Change-Id: I0edb89bddf146cf91a8e7a99c56b2278c8f38094
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6751
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There were a couple more asm lines to turn into __asm__ when the patches got
reordered slightly.
Change-Id: I44be5caee6d09bb3db5dea4791592b12d175822c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6741
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The consumers have all been updated, so we can move EVP_aead_chacha20_poly1305
to its final state. Unfortunately, the _rfc7539-suffixed version will need to
stick around for just a hair longer. Also the tls1.h macros, but the remaining
consumers are okay with that changing underneath them.
Change-Id: Ibbb70ec1860d6ac6a7e1d7b45e70fe692bf5ebe5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6600
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6101 was mismerged from *ring* and
lost some tests. Also add the corresponding tag truncation tests for the new
construction. So long as we have that feature, we should have tests for it.
(Although, do we actually need to support it?)
Change-Id: I70784cbac345e0ad11b496102856c53932b7362e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6682
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
clang scan-build is annoyed it's not obvious the sizeof line matches the
pointer type. This is easy to fix and makes it be quiet.
Change-Id: Iec80d2a087f81179c88cae300f56d3f76b32b347
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6701
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than the length of the top-level CBB, which is kind of odd when ASN.1
length prefixes are not yet determined, return the number of bytes written to
the CBB so far. This can be computed without increasing the size of CBB at all.
Have offset and pending_*.
This means functions which take in a CBB as argument will not be sensitive to
whether the CBB is a top-level or child CBB. The extensions logic had to be
careful to only ever compare differences of lengths, which was awkward.
The reversal will also allow for the following pattern in the future, once
CBB_add_space is split into, say, CBB_reserve and CBB_did_write and we add a
CBB_data:
uint8_t *signature;
size_t signature_len = 0;
if (!CBB_add_asn1(out, &cert, CBB_ASN1_SEQUENCE) ||
/* Emit the TBSCertificate. */
!CBB_add_asn1(&cert, &tbs_cert, CBS_ASN1_SEQUENCE) ||
!CBB_add_tbs_cert_stuff(&tbs_cert, stuff) ||
!CBB_flush(&cert) ||
/* Feed it into md_ctx. */
!EVP_DigestSignInit(&md_ctx, NULL, EVP_sha256(), NULL, pkey) ||
!EVP_DigestSignUpdate(&md_ctx, CBB_data(&cert), CBB_len(&cert)) ||
/* Emit the signature algorithm. */
!CBB_add_asn1(&cert, &sig_alg, CBS_ASN1_SEQUENCE) ||
!CBB_add_sigalg_stuff(&sig_alg, other_stuff) ||
/* Emit the signature. */
!EVP_DigestSignFinal(&md_ctx, NULL, &signature_len) ||
!CBB_reserve(&cert, &signature, signature_len) ||
!EVP_DigestSignFinal(&md_ctx, signature, &signature_len) ||
!CBB_did_write(&cert, signature_len)) {
goto err;
}
(Were TBSCertificate not the first field, we'd still have to sample
CBB_len(&cert), but at least that's reasonable straight-forward. The
alternative would be if CBB_data and CBB_len somehow worked on
recently-invalidated CBBs, but that would go wrong once the invalidated CBB's
parent flushed and possibly shifts everything.)
And similar for signing ServerKeyExchange.
Change-Id: I7761e492ae472d7632875b5666b6088970261b14
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6681
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I skipped a patch when landing and so 793c21e2 caused a build failure
when platform-specific versions of these macros were used.
Change-Id: I8ed6dbb92a511ef306d45087c3eb87781fdfed31
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6740
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is a remnant from when the headers in include/ where still
symlinks.
Change-Id: Ice27c412c0cdcc43312f5297119678091dcd5d38
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6670
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's only used in one file. No sense in polluting the namespace here.
Change-Id: Iaf3870a4be2d2cad950f4d080e25fe7f0d3929c7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6660
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Nothing ever uses the return value. It'd be better off discarding it rather
than make callers stick (void) everywhere.
Change-Id: Ia28c970a1e5a27db441e4511249589d74408849b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6653
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The uint32_t likely dates to them using HASH_LONG everywhere. Nothing ever
touches c->data as a uint32_t, only bytes. (Which makes sense seeing as it
stores the partial block.)
Change-Id: I634cb7f2b6306523aa663f8697b7dc92aa491320
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6651
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I would hope any sensible compiler would recognize the rotation. (If
not, we should at least pull this into crypto/internal.h.) Confirmed
that clang at least produces the exact same instructions for
sha256_block_data_order for release + NO_ASM. This is also mostly moot
as SHA-1 and SHA-256 both have assembly versions on x86 that sidestep
most of this.
For the digests, take it out of md32_common.h since it doesn't use the
macro. md32_common.h isn't sure whether it's a multiply-included header
or not. It should be, but it has an #include guard (doesn't quite do
what you'd want) and will get HOST_c2l, etc., confused if one tries to
include it twice.
Change-Id: I1632801de6473ffd2c6557f3412521ec5d6b305c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6650
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Manual tweaks and then clang-formatted again.
Change-Id: I809fdb71b2135343e5c1264dd659b464780fc54a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6649
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We've tweaked it already and upstream's using a different indentation
style now anyway. This is the first of two commits. For verifiability,
this is the output of clang-format with no modifications.
Change-Id: Ia30f20bee0cc8046aedf9ac7106cc4630e8d93e6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6648
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
38 error codes have fallen off the list since the last time we did this.
Change-Id: Id7ee30889a5da2f6ab66957fd8e49e97640c8489
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6643
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See also upstream's 06cf881a3a10d5af3c1255c08cfd0c6ddb5f1cc3,
9f040d6decca7930e978784c917f731e5c45e8f0, and
9f6795e7d2d1e35668ad70ba0afc480062be4e2e.
Change-Id: I27d90e382867a5fe988d152b31f8494e001a6a9f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6628
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Avoids bouncing on the lock, but it doesn't really matter since it's all
taking read locks. If we're declaring that callbacks don't get to see
every object being created, they shouldn't see every object being
destroyed.
CRYPTO_dup_ex_data also already had this optimization, though it wasn't
documented.
BUG=391192
Change-Id: I5b8282335112bca3850a7c0168f8bd7f7d4a2d57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6626
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This callback is never used. The one caller I've ever seen is in Android
code which isn't built with BoringSSL and it was a no-op.
It also doesn't actually make much sense. A callback cannot reasonably
assume that it sees every, say, SSL_CTX created because the index may be
registered after the first SSL_CTX is created. Nor is there any point in
an EX_DATA consumer in one file knowing about an SSL_CTX created in
completely unrelated code.
Replace all the pointers with a typedef to int*. This will ensure code
which passes NULL or 0 continues to compile while breaking code which
passes an actual function.
This simplifies some object creation functions which now needn't worry
about CRYPTO_new_ex_data failing. (Also avoids bouncing on the lock, but
it's taking a read lock, so this doesn't really matter.)
BUG=391192
Change-Id: I02893883c6fa8693682075b7b130aa538a0a1437
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6625
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Remove the custom copy of those helpers.
Change-Id: I810c3ae8dbf7bc0654d3e9fb9900c425d36f64aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6611
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's d88ef40a1e5c81d0d32b4a431e55f5456e678dd2 and
943c4ca62b3f5a160340d57aecb9413407a06e15.)
Change-Id: Idd52aebae6839695be0f3a8a7659adeec6650b98
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6556
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In some cases it would be good to restrict the input range of scalars
given to |EC_METHOD::mul| to be [0, order-1]. This is a first step
towards that goal.
Change-Id: I58a25db06f6c7a68a0ac1fe79794b04f7a173b23
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6562
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
|EC_GROUP_get0_order| doesn't require any heap allocations and never
fails, so it is much more convenient and more efficient for callers to
call.
Change-Id: Ic60f768875e7bc8e74362dacdb5cbbc6957b05a6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6532
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Native Client doesn't support fcntl natively and its default
implemention just returns ENOSYS.
Change-Id: Id8615e2f6f0a75a1140f8efd75afde471ccdf466
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6721
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I messed up and missed that we were carrying a diff on x86_64-mont5.pl. This
was accidentally dropped in https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6616.
To confirm the merge is good now, check out at this revision and run:
git diff e701f16bd69b6f251ed537e40364c281e85a63b2^ crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-mont5.pl > /tmp/A
Then in OpenSSL's repository:
git diff d73cc256c8e256c32ed959456101b73ba9842f72^ d73cc256c8e256c32ed959456101b73ba9842f72 crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-mont5.pl > /tmp/B
And confirm the diffs vary in only metadata:
diff -u /tmp/A /tmp/B
--- /tmp/A 2015-12-03 11:53:23.127034998 -0500
+++ /tmp/B 2015-12-03 11:53:53.099314287 -0500
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
diff --git a/crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-mont5.pl b/crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-mont5.pl
-index 38def07..3c5a8fc 100644
+index 388e3c6..64e668f 100755
--- a/crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-mont5.pl
+++ b/crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-mont5.pl
-@@ -1770,6 +1770,15 @@ sqr8x_reduction:
+@@ -1784,6 +1784,15 @@ sqr8x_reduction:
.align 32
.L8x_tail_done:
add (%rdx),%r8 # can this overflow?
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
xor %rax,%rax
neg $carry
-@@ -3116,6 +3125,15 @@ sqrx8x_reduction:
+@@ -3130,6 +3139,15 @@ sqrx8x_reduction:
.align 32
.Lsqrx8x_tail_done:
add 24+8(%rsp),%r8 # can this overflow?
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
mov $carry,%rax # xor %rax,%rax
sub 16+8(%rsp),$carry # mov 16(%rsp),%cf
-@@ -3159,13 +3177,11 @@ my ($rptr,$nptr)=("%rdx","%rbp");
+@@ -3173,13 +3191,11 @@ my ($rptr,$nptr)=("%rdx","%rbp");
my @ri=map("%r$_",(10..13));
my @ni=map("%r$_",(14..15));
$code.=<<___;
Change-Id: I3fb5253783ed82e4831f5bffde75273bd9609c23
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6618
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Avoid seg fault by checking mgf1 parameter is not NULL. This can be
triggered during certificate verification so could be a DoS attack
against a client or a server enabling client authentication.
Thanks to Loïc Jonas Etienne (Qnective AG) for discovering this bug.
CVE-2015-3194
(Imported from upstream's c394a488942387246653833359a5c94b5832674e and test
data from 00456fded43eadd4bb94bf675ae4ea5d158a764f.)
Change-Id: Ic97059d42722fd810973ccb0c26c415c4eaae79a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6617
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
When parsing a combined structure pass a flag to the decode routine
so on error a pointer to the parent structure is not zeroed as
this will leak any additional components in the parent.
This can leak memory in any application parsing PKCS#7 or CMS structures.
CVE-2015-3195.
Thanks to Adam Langley (Google/BoringSSL) for discovering this bug using
libFuzzer.
PR#4131
(Imported from upstream's cc598f321fbac9c04da5766243ed55d55948637d, with test
from our original report. Verified ASan trips up on the test without the fix.)
Change-Id: I007d93f172b2f16bf6845d685d72717ed840276c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6615
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
