That we're half and half is really confusing.
Change-Id: I1c2632682e8a3e63d01dada8e0eb3b735ff709ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6785
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This callback is never used. The one caller I've ever seen is in Android
code which isn't built with BoringSSL and it was a no-op.
It also doesn't actually make much sense. A callback cannot reasonably
assume that it sees every, say, SSL_CTX created because the index may be
registered after the first SSL_CTX is created. Nor is there any point in
an EX_DATA consumer in one file knowing about an SSL_CTX created in
completely unrelated code.
Replace all the pointers with a typedef to int*. This will ensure code
which passes NULL or 0 continues to compile while breaking code which
passes an actual function.
This simplifies some object creation functions which now needn't worry
about CRYPTO_new_ex_data failing. (Also avoids bouncing on the lock, but
it's taking a read lock, so this doesn't really matter.)
BUG=391192
Change-Id: I02893883c6fa8693682075b7b130aa538a0a1437
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6625
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The original logic was rather confusing.
Change-Id: I097e57817ea8ec2dd65a413c8751fba1682e928b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6320
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
In doing so, fix the documentation for SSL_CTX_add_session and
SSL_CTX_remove_session. I misread the code and documented the behavior
on session ID collision wrong.
Change-Id: I6f364305e1f092b9eb0b1402962fd04577269d30
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6319
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
A random 32-byte (so 256-bit) session ID is never going to collide with
an existing one. (And, if it does, SSL_CTX_add_session does account for
this, so the server won't explode. Just attempting to resume some
session will fail.)
That logic didn't completely work anyway as it didn't account for
external session caches or multiple connections picking the same ID in
parallel (generation and insertion happen at different times) or
multiple servers sharing one cache. In theory one could fix this by
passing in a sufficiently clever generate_session_id, but no one does
that.
I found no callers of these functions, so just remove them altogether.
Change-Id: I8500c592cf4676de6d7194d611b99e9e76f150a7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6318
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
This callback is some combination of arguably useful stuff (bracket
handshakes, alerts) and completely insane things (find out when the
state machine advances). Deprecate the latter.
Change-Id: Ibea5b32cb360b767b0f45b302fd5f1fe17850593
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6305
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Deprecate the client_cert_cb variant since you can't really configure
intermediates with it. (You might be able to by configuring the
intermediates without the leaf or key and leaving the SSL stack to
configure those, but that's really weird. cert_cb is simpler.)
Also document the two functions the callbacks may use to query the
CertificateRequest on the client.
Change-Id: Iad6076266fd798cd74ea4e09978e7f5df5c8a670
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6092
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL 3.0 used to have a nice and simple rule around extensions. They don't
exist. And then RFC 5746 came along and made this all extremely confusing.
In an SSL 3.0 server, rather than blocking ServerHello extension
emission when renegotiation_info is missing, ignore all ClientHello
extensions but renegotiation_info. This avoids a mismatch between local
state and the extensions with emit.
Notably if, for some reason, a ClientHello includes the session_ticket
extension, does NOT include renegotiation_info or the SCSV, and yet the
client or server are decrepit enough to negotiate SSL 3.0, the
connection will fail due to unexpected NewSessionTicket message.
See https://crbug.com/425979#c9 for a discussion of something similar
that came up in diagnosing https://poodle.io/'s buggy POODLE check.
This is analogous to upstream's
5a3d8eebb7667b32af0ccc3f12f314df6809d32d.
(Not supporting renego as a server in any form anyway, we may as well
completely ignore extensions, but then our extensions callbacks can't
assume the parse hooks are always called. This way the various NULL
handlers still function.)
Change-Id: Ie689a0e9ffb0369ef7a20ab4231005e87f32d5f8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6180
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some code relies on OpenSSL's behavior where it allowed for NULL. But this time
add a comment so people don't think this is the convention for new functions.
BUG=538292
Change-Id: I66566e0e24566fafe17e05369276248be3b05591
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6070
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ssl.h should be first. Also two lines after includes and the rest of the
file.
Change-Id: Icb7586e00a3e64170082c96cf3f8bfbb2b7e1611
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5892
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also switch to the new variable names (SSL_CTX *ctx, SSL *ssl,
SSL_SESSION *session) for all documented functions.
Change-Id: I15e15a703b96af1727601108223c7ce3b0691f1d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5882
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
