02edcd0098
This is in preparation for switching finish_handshake to a release_current_message hook. finish_handshake in DTLS is also responsible for releasing any memory associated with extra messages in the handshake. Except that's not right and we need to make it an error anyway. Given that the rest of the DTLS dispatch layer already strongly assumes there is only one message in epoch one, putting the check in the fragment processing works fine enough. Add tests for this. This will certainly need revising when DTLS 1.3 happens (perhaps just a version check, perhaps bringing finish_handshake back as a function that can fail... which means we need a state just before SSL_ST_OK), but DTLS 1.3 post-handshake messages haven't really been written down, so let's do the easy thing for now and add a test for when it gets more interesting. This removes the sequence number reset in the DTLS code. That reset never did anything becase we don't and never will renego. We should make sure DTLS 1.3 does not bring the reset back for post-handshake stuff. (It was wrong in 1.2 too. Penultimate-flight retransmits and renego requests are ambiguous in DTLS.) BUG=83 Change-Id: I33d645a8550f73e74606030b9815fdac0c9fb682 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8988 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.github | ||
crypto | ||
decrepit | ||
fuzz | ||
include/openssl | ||
infra/config | ||
ssl | ||
third_party/android-cmake | ||
tool | ||
util | ||
.clang-format | ||
.gitignore | ||
BUILDING.md | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
codereview.settings | ||
CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
FUZZING.md | ||
INCORPORATING.md | ||
LICENSE | ||
PORTING.md | ||
README.md | ||
STYLE.md |
BoringSSL
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful:
- PORTING.md: how to port OpenSSL-using code to BoringSSL.
- BUILDING.md: how to build BoringSSL
- INCORPORATING.md: how to incorporate BoringSSL into a project.
- STYLE.md: rules and guidelines for coding style.
- include/openssl: public headers with API documentation in comments. Also available online.
- FUZZING.md: information about fuzzing BoringSSL.
- CONTRIBUTING.md: how to contribute to BoringSSL.