boringssl

History

David Benjamin 5ecfb10d54 Modernize OPENSSL_COMPILE_ASSERT, part 2. The change seems to have stuck, so bring us closer to C/++11 static asserts. (If we later find we need to support worse toolchains, we can always use __LINE__ or __COUNTER__ to avoid duplicate typedef names and just punt on embedding the message into the type name.) Change-Id: I0e5bb1106405066f07740728e19ebe13cae3e0ee Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33145 Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>	2018-11-14 16:06:37 +00:00
..
base64_test.cc	Run the comment converter on libcrypto.	2017-08-18 21:49:04 +00:00
base64.c	Modernize OPENSSL_COMPILE_ASSERT, part 2.	2018-11-14 16:06:37 +00:00

David Benjamin 5ecfb10d54 Modernize OPENSSL_COMPILE_ASSERT, part 2.

The change seems to have stuck, so bring us closer to C/++11 static asserts.

(If we later find we need to support worse toolchains, we can always use
__LINE__ or __COUNTER__ to avoid duplicate typedef names and just punt on
embedding the message into the type name.)

Change-Id: I0e5bb1106405066f07740728e19ebe13cae3e0ee
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33145
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

2018-11-14 16:06:37 +00:00

base64_test.cc

Run the comment converter on libcrypto.

2017-08-18 21:49:04 +00:00

base64.c

Modernize OPENSSL_COMPILE_ASSERT, part 2.

2018-11-14 16:06:37 +00:00