c937edef3e
It seems in this context, one doesn't escape _. https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/HEAD/INCORPORATING.md#Bazel Change-Id: I7ec587de8e9d033a3cb9f108ec645e4ce5e0c4fc Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8660 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
109 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
109 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
# Incorporating BoringSSL into a project
|
|
|
|
**Note**: if your target project is not a Google project then first read the
|
|
[main README](/README.md) about the purpose of BoringSSL.
|
|
|
|
## Bazel
|
|
|
|
If you are using [Bazel](http://www.bazel.io) then you can incorporate
|
|
BoringSSL as an external repository by using a commit from the
|
|
`master-with-bazel` branch. That branch is maintained by a bot from `master`
|
|
and includes the needed generated files and a top-level BUILD file.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
git_repository(
|
|
name = "boringssl",
|
|
commit = "_some commit_",
|
|
remote = "https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl",
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
You would still need to keep the referenced commit up to date if a specific
|
|
commit is referred to.
|
|
|
|
## Directory layout
|
|
|
|
Typically projects create a `third_party/boringssl` directory to put
|
|
BoringSSL-specific files into. The source code of BoringSSL itself goes into
|
|
`third_party/boringssl/src`, either by copying or as a
|
|
[submodule](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-submodule).
|
|
|
|
It's generally a mistake to put BoringSSL's source code into
|
|
`third_party/boringssl` directly because pre-built files and custom build files
|
|
need to go somewhere and merging these with the BoringSSL source code makes
|
|
updating things more complex.
|
|
|
|
## Build support
|
|
|
|
BoringSSL is designed to work with many different build systems. Currently,
|
|
different projects use [GYP](https://gyp.gsrc.io/),
|
|
[GN](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/tools/gn/docs/quick_start.md),
|
|
[Bazel](http://bazel.io/) and [Make](https://www.gnu.org/software/make/) to
|
|
build BoringSSL, without too much pain.
|
|
|
|
The development build system is CMake and the CMake build knows how to
|
|
automatically generate the intermediate files that BoringSSL needs. However,
|
|
outside of the CMake environment, these intermediates are generated once and
|
|
checked into the incorporating project's source repository. This avoids
|
|
incorporating projects needing to support Perl and Go in their build systems.
|
|
|
|
The script [`util/generate_build_files.py`](/util/generate_build_files.py)
|
|
expects to be run from the `third_party/boringssl` directory and to find the
|
|
BoringSSL source code in `src/`. You should pass it a single argument: the name
|
|
of the build system that you're using. If you don't use any of the supported
|
|
build systems then you should augment `generate_build_files.py` with support
|
|
for it.
|
|
|
|
The script will pregenerate the intermediate files (see
|
|
[BUILDING.md](/BUILDING.md) for details about which tools will need to be
|
|
installed) and output helper files for that build system. It doesn't generate a
|
|
complete build script, just file and test lists, which change often. For
|
|
example, see the
|
|
[file](https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/boringssl/BUILD.generated.gni)
|
|
and
|
|
[test](https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/boringssl/BUILD.generated_tests.gni)
|
|
lists generated for GN in Chromium.
|
|
|
|
Generally one checks in these generated files alongside the hand-written build
|
|
files. Periodically an engineer updates the BoringSSL revision, regenerates
|
|
these files and checks in the updated result. As an example, see how this is
|
|
done [in Chromium](https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/boringssl/).
|
|
|
|
## Defines
|
|
|
|
BoringSSL does not present a lot of configurability in order to reduce the
|
|
number of configurations that need to be tested. But there are a couple of
|
|
\#defines that you may wish to set:
|
|
|
|
`OPENSSL_NO_ASM` prevents the use of assembly code (although it's up to you to
|
|
ensure that the build system doesn't link it in if you wish to reduce binary
|
|
size). This will have a significant performance impact but can be useful if you
|
|
wish to use tools like
|
|
[AddressSanitizer](http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html) that
|
|
interact poorly with assembly code.
|
|
|
|
`OPENSSL_SMALL` removes some code that is especially large at some performance
|
|
cost.
|
|
|
|
## Symbols
|
|
|
|
You cannot link multiple versions of BoringSSL or OpenSSL into a single binary
|
|
without dealing with symbol conflicts. If you are statically linking multiple
|
|
versions together, there's not a lot that can be done because C doesn't have a
|
|
module system.
|
|
|
|
If you are using multiple versions in a single binary, in different shared
|
|
objects, ensure you build BoringSSL with `-fvisibility=hidden` and do not
|
|
export any of BoringSSL's symbols. This will prevent any collisions with other
|
|
verisons that may be included in other shared objects. Note that this requires
|
|
that all callers of BoringSSL APIs live in the same shared object as BoringSSL.
|
|
|
|
If you require that BoringSSL APIs be used across shared object boundaries,
|
|
continue to build with `-fvisibility=hidden` but define
|
|
`BORINGSSL_SHARED_LIBRARY` in both BoringSSL and consumers. BoringSSL's own
|
|
source files (but *not* consumers' source files) must also build with
|
|
`BORINGSSL_IMPLEMENTATION` defined. This will export BoringSSL's public symbols
|
|
in the resulting shared object while hiding private symbols. However note that,
|
|
as with a static link, this precludes dynamically linking with another version
|
|
of BoringSSL or OpenSSL.
|