5b33effa72
BoringSSL depends on the platform's locking APIs to make internal global state thread-safe, including the PRNG. On some single-threaded embedded platforms, locking APIs may not exist, so this dependency may be disabled with a build flag. Doing so means the consumer promises the library will never be used in any multi-threaded address space. It causes BoringSSL to be globally thread-unsafe. Setting it inappropriately will subtly and unpredictably corrupt memory and leak secret keys. Unfortunately, folks sometimes misinterpreted OPENSSL_NO_THREADS as skipping an internal thread pool or disabling an optionally extra-thread-safe mode. This is not and has never been the case. Rename it to OPENSSL_NO_THREADS_CORRUPT_MEMORY_AND_LEAK_SECRETS_IF_THREADED to clarify what this option does. Update-Note: As a first step, this CL makes both OPENSSL_NO_THREADS and OPENSSL_NO_THREADS_CORRUPT_MEMORY_AND_LEAK_SECRETS_IF_THREADED work. A later CL will remove the old name, so migrate callers after or at the same time as picking up this CL. Change-Id: Ibe4964ae43eb7a52f08fd966fccb330c0cc11a8c Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/32084 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.github | ||
crypto | ||
decrepit | ||
fipstools | ||
fuzz | ||
include/openssl | ||
infra/config | ||
ssl | ||
third_party | ||
tool | ||
util | ||
.clang-format | ||
.gitignore | ||
API-CONVENTIONS.md | ||
BREAKING-CHANGES.md | ||
BUILDING.md | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
codereview.settings | ||
CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
FUZZING.md | ||
go.mod | ||
INCORPORATING.md | ||
LICENSE | ||
PORTING.md | ||
README.md | ||
sources.cmake | ||
STYLE.md |
BoringSSL
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful:
- PORTING.md: how to port OpenSSL-using code to BoringSSL.
- BUILDING.md: how to build BoringSSL
- INCORPORATING.md: how to incorporate BoringSSL into a project.
- API-CONVENTIONS.md: general API conventions for BoringSSL consumers and developers.
- STYLE.md: rules and guidelines for coding style.
- include/openssl: public headers with API documentation in comments. Also available online.
- FUZZING.md: information about fuzzing BoringSSL.
- CONTRIBUTING.md: how to contribute to BoringSSL.
- BREAKING-CHANGES.md: notes on potentially-breaking changes.