boringssl/crypto/cpu-ppc64le.c

39 lines
1.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Add PPC64LE assembly for AES-GCM. This change adds AES and GHASH assembly from upstream, with the aim of speeding up AES-GCM. The PPC64LE assembly matches the interface of the ARMv8 assembly so I've changed the prefix of both sets of asm functions to be the same ("aes_hw_"). Otherwise, the new assmebly files and Perlasm match exactly those from upstream's c536b6be1a (from their master branch). Before: Did 1879000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000428us (1878196.1 ops/sec): 30.1 MB/s Did 61000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006660us (60596.4 ops/sec): 81.8 MB/s Did 11000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1072649us (10255.0 ops/sec): 84.0 MB/s Did 1665000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000591us (1664016.6 ops/sec): 26.6 MB/s Did 52000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006971us (51640.0 ops/sec): 69.7 MB/s Did 8840 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1013294us (8724.0 ops/sec): 71.5 MB/s After: Did 4994000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000017us (4993915.1 ops/sec): 79.9 MB/s Did 1389000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000073us (1388898.6 ops/sec): 1875.0 MB/s Did 319000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000101us (318967.8 ops/sec): 2613.0 MB/s Did 4668000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000149us (4667304.6 ops/sec): 74.7 MB/s Did 1202000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000646us (1201224.0 ops/sec): 1621.7 MB/s Did 269000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1002804us (268247.8 ops/sec): 2197.5 MB/s Change-Id: Id848562bd4e1aa79a4683012501dfa5e6c08cfcc Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11262 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2016-09-23 20:47:24 +01:00
/* Copyright (c) 2016, Google Inc.
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
* purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
* copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
* WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
* MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY
* SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
* WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION
* OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN
* CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. */
#include <openssl/cpu.h>
#if defined(OPENSSL_PPC64LE)
#include <sys/auxv.h>
#include "internal.h"
#if !defined(PPC_FEATURE2_HAS_VCRYPTO)
/* PPC_FEATURE2_HAS_VCRYPTO was taken from section 4.1.2.3 of the “OpenPOWER
* ABI for Linux Supplement. */
#define PPC_FEATURE2_HAS_VCRYPTO 0x02000000
#endif
void OPENSSL_cpuid_setup(void) {
Make the POWER hardware capability value a global in crypto.c. (Thanks to Sam Panzer for the patch.) At least some linkers will drop constructor functions if no symbols from that translation unit are used elsewhere in the program. On POWER, since the cached capability value isn't a global in crypto.o (like other platforms), the constructor function is getting discarded. The C++11 spec says (3.6.2, paragraph 4): It is implementation-defined whether the dynamic initialization of a non-local variable with static storage duration is done before the first statement of main. If the initialization is deferred to some point in time after the first statement of main, it shall occur before the first odr-use (3.2) of any function or variable defined in the same translation unit as the variable to be initialized. Compilers appear to interpret that to mean they are allowed to drop (i.e. indefinitely defer) constructors that occur in translation units that are never used, so they can avoid initializing some part of a library if it's dropped on the floor. This change makes the hardware capability value for POWER a global in crypto.c, which should prevent the constructor function from being ignored. Change-Id: I43ebe492d0ac1491f6f6c2097971a277f923dd3e Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14664 Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 19:08:28 +01:00
OPENSSL_ppc64le_hwcap2 = getauxval(AT_HWCAP2);
Add PPC64LE assembly for AES-GCM. This change adds AES and GHASH assembly from upstream, with the aim of speeding up AES-GCM. The PPC64LE assembly matches the interface of the ARMv8 assembly so I've changed the prefix of both sets of asm functions to be the same ("aes_hw_"). Otherwise, the new assmebly files and Perlasm match exactly those from upstream's c536b6be1a (from their master branch). Before: Did 1879000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000428us (1878196.1 ops/sec): 30.1 MB/s Did 61000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006660us (60596.4 ops/sec): 81.8 MB/s Did 11000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1072649us (10255.0 ops/sec): 84.0 MB/s Did 1665000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000591us (1664016.6 ops/sec): 26.6 MB/s Did 52000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006971us (51640.0 ops/sec): 69.7 MB/s Did 8840 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1013294us (8724.0 ops/sec): 71.5 MB/s After: Did 4994000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000017us (4993915.1 ops/sec): 79.9 MB/s Did 1389000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000073us (1388898.6 ops/sec): 1875.0 MB/s Did 319000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000101us (318967.8 ops/sec): 2613.0 MB/s Did 4668000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000149us (4667304.6 ops/sec): 74.7 MB/s Did 1202000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000646us (1201224.0 ops/sec): 1621.7 MB/s Did 269000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1002804us (268247.8 ops/sec): 2197.5 MB/s Change-Id: Id848562bd4e1aa79a4683012501dfa5e6c08cfcc Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11262 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2016-09-23 20:47:24 +01:00
}
int CRYPTO_is_PPC64LE_vcrypto_capable(void) {
Make the POWER hardware capability value a global in crypto.c. (Thanks to Sam Panzer for the patch.) At least some linkers will drop constructor functions if no symbols from that translation unit are used elsewhere in the program. On POWER, since the cached capability value isn't a global in crypto.o (like other platforms), the constructor function is getting discarded. The C++11 spec says (3.6.2, paragraph 4): It is implementation-defined whether the dynamic initialization of a non-local variable with static storage duration is done before the first statement of main. If the initialization is deferred to some point in time after the first statement of main, it shall occur before the first odr-use (3.2) of any function or variable defined in the same translation unit as the variable to be initialized. Compilers appear to interpret that to mean they are allowed to drop (i.e. indefinitely defer) constructors that occur in translation units that are never used, so they can avoid initializing some part of a library if it's dropped on the floor. This change makes the hardware capability value for POWER a global in crypto.c, which should prevent the constructor function from being ignored. Change-Id: I43ebe492d0ac1491f6f6c2097971a277f923dd3e Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14664 Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2017-04-04 19:08:28 +01:00
return (OPENSSL_ppc64le_hwcap2 & PPC_FEATURE2_HAS_VCRYPTO) != 0;
Add PPC64LE assembly for AES-GCM. This change adds AES and GHASH assembly from upstream, with the aim of speeding up AES-GCM. The PPC64LE assembly matches the interface of the ARMv8 assembly so I've changed the prefix of both sets of asm functions to be the same ("aes_hw_"). Otherwise, the new assmebly files and Perlasm match exactly those from upstream's c536b6be1a (from their master branch). Before: Did 1879000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000428us (1878196.1 ops/sec): 30.1 MB/s Did 61000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006660us (60596.4 ops/sec): 81.8 MB/s Did 11000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1072649us (10255.0 ops/sec): 84.0 MB/s Did 1665000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000591us (1664016.6 ops/sec): 26.6 MB/s Did 52000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006971us (51640.0 ops/sec): 69.7 MB/s Did 8840 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1013294us (8724.0 ops/sec): 71.5 MB/s After: Did 4994000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000017us (4993915.1 ops/sec): 79.9 MB/s Did 1389000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000073us (1388898.6 ops/sec): 1875.0 MB/s Did 319000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000101us (318967.8 ops/sec): 2613.0 MB/s Did 4668000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000149us (4667304.6 ops/sec): 74.7 MB/s Did 1202000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000646us (1201224.0 ops/sec): 1621.7 MB/s Did 269000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1002804us (268247.8 ops/sec): 2197.5 MB/s Change-Id: Id848562bd4e1aa79a4683012501dfa5e6c08cfcc Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11262 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2016-09-23 20:47:24 +01:00
}
#endif /* OPENSSL_PPC64LE */