boringssl/crypto/fipsmodule/modes/cfb.c

236 lines
7.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* ====================================================================
* Copyright (c) 2008 The OpenSSL Project. All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
*
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
*
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
* the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
* distribution.
*
* 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
* software must display the following acknowledgment:
* "This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project
* for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/)"
*
* 4. The names "OpenSSL Toolkit" and "OpenSSL Project" must not be used to
* endorse or promote products derived from this software without
* prior written permission. For written permission, please contact
* openssl-core@openssl.org.
*
* 5. Products derived from this software may not be called "OpenSSL"
* nor may "OpenSSL" appear in their names without prior written
* permission of the OpenSSL Project.
*
* 6. Redistributions of any form whatsoever must retain the following
* acknowledgment:
* "This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project
* for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit (http://www.openssl.org/)"
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE OpenSSL PROJECT ``AS IS'' AND ANY
* EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
* PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE OpenSSL PROJECT OR
* ITS CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
* SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT
* NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
* LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
* STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
* ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED
* OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
* ==================================================================== */
#include <openssl/type_check.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "internal.h"
OPENSSL_STATIC_ASSERT(16 % sizeof(size_t) == 0,
"block cannot be divided into size_t");
void CRYPTO_cfb128_encrypt(const uint8_t *in, uint8_t *out, size_t len,
const AES_KEY *key, uint8_t ivec[16], unsigned *num,
int enc, block128_f block) {
size_t l = 0;
assert(in && out && key && ivec && num);
unsigned n = *num;
if (enc) {
while (n && len) {
*(out++) = ivec[n] ^= *(in++);
--len;
n = (n + 1) % 16;
}
#if STRICT_ALIGNMENT
Appease UBSan on pointer alignment. Even without strict-aliasing, C does not allow casting pointers to types that don't match their alignment. After this change, UBSan is happy with our code at default settings but for the negative left shift language bug. Note: architectures without unaligned loads do not generate the same code for memcpy and pointer casts. But even ARMv6 can perform unaligned loads and stores (ARMv5 couldn't), so we should be okay here. Before: Did 11086000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000391us (2217026.6 ops/sec): 35.5 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005208us (73923.0 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5029958us (12525.0 ops/sec): 102.6 MB/s Did 9894000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000017us (1978793.3 ops/sec): 31.7 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005564us (63129.7 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5054156us (10684.3 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s After: Did 11026000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000197us (2205113.1 ops/sec): 35.3 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005781us (73914.5 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5032695us (12518.1 ops/sec): 102.5 MB/s Did 9831750 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000010us (1966346.1 ops/sec): 31.5 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005702us (63128.0 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5053642us (10685.4 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s (Tested with the no-asm builds; most of this code isn't reachable otherwise.) Change-Id: I025c365d26491abed0116b0de3b7612159e52297 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22804 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2017-11-07 22:24:10 +00:00
if (((uintptr_t)in | (uintptr_t)out | (uintptr_t)ivec) % sizeof(size_t) !=
0) {
while (l < len) {
if (n == 0) {
(*block)(ivec, ivec, key);
}
out[l] = ivec[n] ^= in[l];
++l;
n = (n + 1) % 16;
}
*num = n;
return;
}
#endif
while (len >= 16) {
(*block)(ivec, ivec, key);
for (; n < 16; n += sizeof(size_t)) {
Appease UBSan on pointer alignment. Even without strict-aliasing, C does not allow casting pointers to types that don't match their alignment. After this change, UBSan is happy with our code at default settings but for the negative left shift language bug. Note: architectures without unaligned loads do not generate the same code for memcpy and pointer casts. But even ARMv6 can perform unaligned loads and stores (ARMv5 couldn't), so we should be okay here. Before: Did 11086000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000391us (2217026.6 ops/sec): 35.5 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005208us (73923.0 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5029958us (12525.0 ops/sec): 102.6 MB/s Did 9894000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000017us (1978793.3 ops/sec): 31.7 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005564us (63129.7 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5054156us (10684.3 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s After: Did 11026000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000197us (2205113.1 ops/sec): 35.3 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005781us (73914.5 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5032695us (12518.1 ops/sec): 102.5 MB/s Did 9831750 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000010us (1966346.1 ops/sec): 31.5 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005702us (63128.0 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5053642us (10685.4 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s (Tested with the no-asm builds; most of this code isn't reachable otherwise.) Change-Id: I025c365d26491abed0116b0de3b7612159e52297 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22804 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2017-11-07 22:24:10 +00:00
size_t tmp = load_word_le(ivec + n) ^ load_word_le(in + n);
store_word_le(ivec + n, tmp);
store_word_le(out + n, tmp);
}
len -= 16;
out += 16;
in += 16;
n = 0;
}
if (len) {
(*block)(ivec, ivec, key);
while (len--) {
out[n] = ivec[n] ^= in[n];
++n;
}
}
*num = n;
return;
} else {
while (n && len) {
uint8_t c;
*(out++) = ivec[n] ^ (c = *(in++));
ivec[n] = c;
--len;
n = (n + 1) % 16;
}
Appease UBSan on pointer alignment. Even without strict-aliasing, C does not allow casting pointers to types that don't match their alignment. After this change, UBSan is happy with our code at default settings but for the negative left shift language bug. Note: architectures without unaligned loads do not generate the same code for memcpy and pointer casts. But even ARMv6 can perform unaligned loads and stores (ARMv5 couldn't), so we should be okay here. Before: Did 11086000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000391us (2217026.6 ops/sec): 35.5 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005208us (73923.0 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5029958us (12525.0 ops/sec): 102.6 MB/s Did 9894000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000017us (1978793.3 ops/sec): 31.7 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005564us (63129.7 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5054156us (10684.3 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s After: Did 11026000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000197us (2205113.1 ops/sec): 35.3 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005781us (73914.5 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5032695us (12518.1 ops/sec): 102.5 MB/s Did 9831750 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000010us (1966346.1 ops/sec): 31.5 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005702us (63128.0 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5053642us (10685.4 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s (Tested with the no-asm builds; most of this code isn't reachable otherwise.) Change-Id: I025c365d26491abed0116b0de3b7612159e52297 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22804 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2017-11-07 22:24:10 +00:00
if (STRICT_ALIGNMENT &&
((uintptr_t)in | (uintptr_t)out | (uintptr_t)ivec) % sizeof(size_t) !=
0) {
while (l < len) {
Appease UBSan on pointer alignment. Even without strict-aliasing, C does not allow casting pointers to types that don't match their alignment. After this change, UBSan is happy with our code at default settings but for the negative left shift language bug. Note: architectures without unaligned loads do not generate the same code for memcpy and pointer casts. But even ARMv6 can perform unaligned loads and stores (ARMv5 couldn't), so we should be okay here. Before: Did 11086000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000391us (2217026.6 ops/sec): 35.5 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005208us (73923.0 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5029958us (12525.0 ops/sec): 102.6 MB/s Did 9894000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000017us (1978793.3 ops/sec): 31.7 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005564us (63129.7 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5054156us (10684.3 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s After: Did 11026000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000197us (2205113.1 ops/sec): 35.3 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005781us (73914.5 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5032695us (12518.1 ops/sec): 102.5 MB/s Did 9831750 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000010us (1966346.1 ops/sec): 31.5 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005702us (63128.0 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5053642us (10685.4 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s (Tested with the no-asm builds; most of this code isn't reachable otherwise.) Change-Id: I025c365d26491abed0116b0de3b7612159e52297 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22804 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2017-11-07 22:24:10 +00:00
uint8_t c;
if (n == 0) {
(*block)(ivec, ivec, key);
}
out[l] = ivec[n] ^ (c = in[l]);
ivec[n] = c;
++l;
n = (n + 1) % 16;
}
*num = n;
return;
}
while (len >= 16) {
(*block)(ivec, ivec, key);
for (; n < 16; n += sizeof(size_t)) {
Appease UBSan on pointer alignment. Even without strict-aliasing, C does not allow casting pointers to types that don't match their alignment. After this change, UBSan is happy with our code at default settings but for the negative left shift language bug. Note: architectures without unaligned loads do not generate the same code for memcpy and pointer casts. But even ARMv6 can perform unaligned loads and stores (ARMv5 couldn't), so we should be okay here. Before: Did 11086000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000391us (2217026.6 ops/sec): 35.5 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005208us (73923.0 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5029958us (12525.0 ops/sec): 102.6 MB/s Did 9894000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000017us (1978793.3 ops/sec): 31.7 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005564us (63129.7 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5054156us (10684.3 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s After: Did 11026000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000197us (2205113.1 ops/sec): 35.3 MB/s Did 370000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005781us (73914.5 ops/sec): 99.8 MB/s Did 63000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5032695us (12518.1 ops/sec): 102.5 MB/s Did 9831750 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 5000010us (1966346.1 ops/sec): 31.5 MB/s Did 316000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 5005702us (63128.0 ops/sec): 85.2 MB/s Did 54000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 5053642us (10685.4 ops/sec): 87.5 MB/s (Tested with the no-asm builds; most of this code isn't reachable otherwise.) Change-Id: I025c365d26491abed0116b0de3b7612159e52297 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22804 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2017-11-07 22:24:10 +00:00
size_t t = load_word_le(in + n);
store_word_le(out + n, load_word_le(ivec + n) ^ t);
store_word_le(ivec + n, t);
}
len -= 16;
out += 16;
in += 16;
n = 0;
}
if (len) {
(*block)(ivec, ivec, key);
while (len--) {
uint8_t c;
out[n] = ivec[n] ^ (c = in[n]);
ivec[n] = c;
++n;
}
}
*num = n;
return;
}
}
/* This expects a single block of size nbits for both in and out. Note that
it corrupts any extra bits in the last byte of out */
static void cfbr_encrypt_block(const uint8_t *in, uint8_t *out, unsigned nbits,
const AES_KEY *key, uint8_t ivec[16], int enc,
block128_f block) {
int n, rem, num;
uint8_t ovec[16 * 2 + 1]; /* +1 because we dererefence (but don't use) one
byte off the end */
if (nbits <= 0 || nbits > 128) {
return;
}
// fill in the first half of the new IV with the current IV
OPENSSL_memcpy(ovec, ivec, 16);
// construct the new IV
(*block)(ivec, ivec, key);
num = (nbits + 7) / 8;
if (enc) {
// encrypt the input
for (n = 0; n < num; ++n) {
out[n] = (ovec[16 + n] = in[n] ^ ivec[n]);
}
} else {
// decrypt the input
for (n = 0; n < num; ++n) {
out[n] = (ovec[16 + n] = in[n]) ^ ivec[n];
}
}
// shift ovec left...
rem = nbits % 8;
num = nbits / 8;
if (rem == 0) {
OPENSSL_memcpy(ivec, ovec + num, 16);
} else {
for (n = 0; n < 16; ++n) {
ivec[n] = ovec[n + num] << rem | ovec[n + num + 1] >> (8 - rem);
}
}
// it is not necessary to cleanse ovec, since the IV is not secret
}
// N.B. This expects the input to be packed, MS bit first
void CRYPTO_cfb128_1_encrypt(const uint8_t *in, uint8_t *out, size_t bits,
const AES_KEY *key, uint8_t ivec[16],
unsigned *num, int enc, block128_f block) {
size_t n;
uint8_t c[1], d[1];
assert(in && out && key && ivec && num);
assert(*num == 0);
for (n = 0; n < bits; ++n) {
c[0] = (in[n / 8] & (1 << (7 - n % 8))) ? 0x80 : 0;
cfbr_encrypt_block(c, d, 1, key, ivec, enc, block);
out[n / 8] = (out[n / 8] & ~(1 << (unsigned int)(7 - n % 8))) |
((d[0] & 0x80) >> (unsigned int)(n % 8));
}
}
void CRYPTO_cfb128_8_encrypt(const unsigned char *in, unsigned char *out,
size_t length, const AES_KEY *key,
unsigned char ivec[16], unsigned *num, int enc,
block128_f block) {
size_t n;
assert(in && out && key && ivec && num);
assert(*num == 0);
for (n = 0; n < length; ++n) {
cfbr_encrypt_block(&in[n], &out[n], 8, key, ivec, enc, block);
}
}