2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
/* Copyright (C) 1995-1998 Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com)
|
|
|
|
* All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This package is an SSL implementation written
|
|
|
|
* by Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com).
|
|
|
|
* The implementation was written so as to conform with Netscapes SSL.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This library is free for commercial and non-commercial use as long as
|
|
|
|
* the following conditions are aheared to. The following conditions
|
|
|
|
* apply to all code found in this distribution, be it the RC4, RSA,
|
|
|
|
* lhash, DES, etc., code; not just the SSL code. The SSL documentation
|
|
|
|
* included with this distribution is covered by the same copyright terms
|
|
|
|
* except that the holder is Tim Hudson (tjh@cryptsoft.com).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright remains Eric Young's, and as such any Copyright notices in
|
|
|
|
* the code are not to be removed.
|
|
|
|
* If this package is used in a product, Eric Young should be given attribution
|
|
|
|
* as the author of the parts of the library used.
|
|
|
|
* This can be in the form of a textual message at program startup or
|
|
|
|
* in documentation (online or textual) provided with the package.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
* are met:
|
|
|
|
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
|
|
* 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
|
|
|
|
* must display the following acknowledgement:
|
|
|
|
* "This product includes cryptographic software written by
|
|
|
|
* Eric Young (eay@cryptsoft.com)"
|
|
|
|
* The word 'cryptographic' can be left out if the rouines from the library
|
|
|
|
* being used are not cryptographic related :-).
|
|
|
|
* 4. If you include any Windows specific code (or a derivative thereof) from
|
|
|
|
* the apps directory (application code) you must include an acknowledgement:
|
|
|
|
* "This product includes software written by Tim Hudson (tjh@cryptsoft.com)"
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY ERIC YOUNG ``AS IS'' AND
|
|
|
|
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
|
|
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
|
|
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
|
|
|
|
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
|
|
|
|
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
|
|
|
|
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
|
|
|
|
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
|
|
|
|
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
|
|
|
|
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
|
|
|
|
* SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The licence and distribution terms for any publically available version or
|
|
|
|
* derivative of this code cannot be changed. i.e. this code cannot simply be
|
|
|
|
* copied and put under another distribution licence
|
|
|
|
* [including the GNU Public Licence.] */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <openssl/bn.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <assert.h>
|
2015-01-31 01:08:37 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-12 03:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <openssl/err.h>
|
2017-11-20 18:42:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <openssl/mem.h>
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <openssl/type_check.h>
|
2017-11-12 03:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
#include "internal.h"
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "../../internal.h"
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-05 21:25:51 +00:00
|
|
|
#define BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL 16
|
|
|
|
#define BN_SQR_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
static void bn_abs_sub_words(BN_ULONG *r, const BN_ULONG *a, const BN_ULONG *b,
|
|
|
|
size_t num, BN_ULONG *tmp) {
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG borrow = bn_sub_words(tmp, a, b, num);
|
|
|
|
bn_sub_words(r, b, a, num);
|
|
|
|
bn_select_words(r, 0 - borrow, r /* tmp < 0 */, tmp /* tmp >= 0 */, num);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-12 03:12:08 +00:00
|
|
|
static void bn_mul_normal(BN_ULONG *r, const BN_ULONG *a, size_t na,
|
|
|
|
const BN_ULONG *b, size_t nb) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (na < nb) {
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
size_t itmp = na;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
na = nb;
|
|
|
|
nb = itmp;
|
2017-11-12 03:12:08 +00:00
|
|
|
const BN_ULONG *ltmp = a;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
a = b;
|
|
|
|
b = ltmp;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
BN_ULONG *rr = &(r[na]);
|
|
|
|
if (nb == 0) {
|
|
|
|
OPENSSL_memset(r, 0, na * sizeof(BN_ULONG));
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
rr[0] = bn_mul_words(r, a, na, b[0]);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (--nb == 0) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rr[1] = bn_mul_add_words(&(r[1]), a, na, b[1]);
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (--nb == 0) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rr[2] = bn_mul_add_words(&(r[2]), a, na, b[2]);
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (--nb == 0) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rr[3] = bn_mul_add_words(&(r[3]), a, na, b[3]);
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (--nb == 0) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rr[4] = bn_mul_add_words(&(r[4]), a, na, b[4]);
|
|
|
|
rr += 4;
|
|
|
|
r += 4;
|
|
|
|
b += 4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-11 01:07:14 +01:00
|
|
|
#if !defined(OPENSSL_X86) || defined(OPENSSL_NO_ASM)
|
2017-08-18 19:06:02 +01:00
|
|
|
// Here follows specialised variants of bn_add_words() and bn_sub_words(). They
|
|
|
|
// have the property performing operations on arrays of different sizes. The
|
|
|
|
// sizes of those arrays is expressed through cl, which is the common length (
|
|
|
|
// basicall, min(len(a),len(b)) ), and dl, which is the delta between the two
|
|
|
|
// lengths, calculated as len(a)-len(b). All lengths are the number of
|
|
|
|
// BN_ULONGs... For the operations that require a result array as parameter,
|
|
|
|
// it must have the length cl+abs(dl). These functions should probably end up
|
|
|
|
// in bn_asm.c as soon as there are assembler counterparts for the systems that
|
|
|
|
// use assembler files.
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static BN_ULONG bn_sub_part_words(BN_ULONG *r, const BN_ULONG *a,
|
|
|
|
const BN_ULONG *b, int cl, int dl) {
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG c, t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(cl >= 0);
|
|
|
|
c = bn_sub_words(r, a, b, cl);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-02-11 06:16:26 +00:00
|
|
|
if (dl == 0) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return c;
|
2015-02-11 06:16:26 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r += cl;
|
|
|
|
a += cl;
|
|
|
|
b += cl;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (dl < 0) {
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
|
|
t = b[0];
|
2017-10-12 04:55:18 +01:00
|
|
|
r[0] = 0 - t - c;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (t != 0) {
|
|
|
|
c = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (++dl >= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t = b[1];
|
2017-10-12 04:55:18 +01:00
|
|
|
r[1] = 0 - t - c;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (t != 0) {
|
|
|
|
c = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (++dl >= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t = b[2];
|
2017-10-12 04:55:18 +01:00
|
|
|
r[2] = 0 - t - c;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (t != 0) {
|
|
|
|
c = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (++dl >= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t = b[3];
|
2017-10-12 04:55:18 +01:00
|
|
|
r[3] = 0 - t - c;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (t != 0) {
|
|
|
|
c = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (++dl >= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b += 4;
|
|
|
|
r += 4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
int save_dl = dl;
|
|
|
|
while (c) {
|
|
|
|
t = a[0];
|
2017-10-12 04:55:18 +01:00
|
|
|
r[0] = t - c;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (t != 0) {
|
|
|
|
c = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t = a[1];
|
2017-10-12 04:55:18 +01:00
|
|
|
r[1] = t - c;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (t != 0) {
|
|
|
|
c = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t = a[2];
|
2017-10-12 04:55:18 +01:00
|
|
|
r[2] = t - c;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (t != 0) {
|
|
|
|
c = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t = a[3];
|
2017-10-12 04:55:18 +01:00
|
|
|
r[3] = t - c;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (t != 0) {
|
|
|
|
c = 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
save_dl = dl;
|
|
|
|
a += 4;
|
|
|
|
r += 4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (dl > 0) {
|
|
|
|
if (save_dl > dl) {
|
|
|
|
switch (save_dl - dl) {
|
|
|
|
case 1:
|
|
|
|
r[1] = a[1];
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-20 16:51:54 +01:00
|
|
|
OPENSSL_FALLTHROUGH;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
case 2:
|
|
|
|
r[2] = a[2];
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-09-20 16:51:54 +01:00
|
|
|
OPENSSL_FALLTHROUGH;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
case 3:
|
|
|
|
r[3] = a[3];
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
a += 4;
|
|
|
|
r += 4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (dl > 0) {
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
|
|
r[0] = a[0];
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r[1] = a[1];
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r[2] = a[2];
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
r[3] = a[3];
|
|
|
|
if (--dl <= 0) {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a += 4;
|
|
|
|
r += 4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return c;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2017-08-18 19:06:02 +01:00
|
|
|
// On other platforms the function is defined in asm.
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
BN_ULONG bn_sub_part_words(BN_ULONG *r, const BN_ULONG *a, const BN_ULONG *b,
|
|
|
|
int cl, int dl);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
// bn_abs_sub_part_words computes |r| = |a| - |b|, storing the absolute value
|
|
|
|
// and returning a mask of all ones if the result was negative and all zeros if
|
|
|
|
// the result was positive. |cl| and |dl| follow the |bn_sub_part_words| calling
|
|
|
|
// convention.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// TODO(davidben): Make this take |size_t|. The |cl| + |dl| calling convention
|
|
|
|
// is confusing. The trouble is 32-bit x86 implements |bn_sub_part_words| in
|
|
|
|
// assembly, but we can probably just delete it?
|
|
|
|
static BN_ULONG bn_abs_sub_part_words(BN_ULONG *r, const BN_ULONG *a,
|
|
|
|
const BN_ULONG *b, int cl, int dl,
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG *tmp) {
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG borrow = bn_sub_part_words(tmp, a, b, cl, dl);
|
|
|
|
bn_sub_part_words(r, b, a, cl, -dl);
|
|
|
|
int r_len = cl + (dl < 0 ? -dl : dl);
|
|
|
|
borrow = 0 - borrow;
|
|
|
|
bn_select_words(r, borrow, r /* tmp < 0 */, tmp /* tmp >= 0 */, r_len);
|
|
|
|
return borrow;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-18 19:06:02 +01:00
|
|
|
// Karatsuba recursive multiplication algorithm
|
|
|
|
// (cf. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 2)
|
|
|
|
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
// bn_mul_recursive sets |r| to |a| * |b|, using |t| as scratch space. |r| has
|
|
|
|
// length 2*|n2|, |a| has length |n2| + |dna|, |b| has length |n2| + |dnb|, and
|
|
|
|
// |t| has length 4*|n2|. |n2| must be a power of two. Finally, we must have
|
|
|
|
// -|BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL|/2 <= |dna| <= 0 and
|
|
|
|
// -|BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL|/2 <= |dnb| <= 0.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// TODO(davidben): Simplify and |size_t| the calling convention around lengths
|
|
|
|
// here.
|
2017-11-12 03:12:08 +00:00
|
|
|
static void bn_mul_recursive(BN_ULONG *r, const BN_ULONG *a, const BN_ULONG *b,
|
|
|
|
int n2, int dna, int dnb, BN_ULONG *t) {
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
// |n2| is a power of two.
|
|
|
|
assert(n2 != 0 && (n2 & (n2 - 1)) == 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check |dna| and |dnb| are in range.
|
|
|
|
assert(-BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL/2 <= dna && dna <= 0);
|
|
|
|
assert(-BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL/2 <= dnb && dnb <= 0);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-18 19:06:02 +01:00
|
|
|
// Only call bn_mul_comba 8 if n2 == 8 and the
|
|
|
|
// two arrays are complete [steve]
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (n2 == 8 && dna == 0 && dnb == 0) {
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba8(r, a, b);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-18 19:06:02 +01:00
|
|
|
// Else do normal multiply
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (n2 < BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL) {
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_normal(r, a, n2 + dna, b, n2 + dnb);
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
if (dna + dnb < 0) {
|
2016-12-13 06:07:13 +00:00
|
|
|
OPENSSL_memset(&r[2 * n2 + dna + dnb], 0,
|
|
|
|
sizeof(BN_ULONG) * -(dna + dnb));
|
2015-02-11 06:16:26 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
// Split |a| and |b| into a0,a1 and b0,b1, where a0 and b0 have size |n|.
|
|
|
|
// Split |t| into t0,t1,t2,t3, each of size |n|, with the remaining 4*|n| used
|
|
|
|
// for recursive calls.
|
|
|
|
// Split |r| into r0,r1,r2,r3. We must contribute a0*b0 to r0,r1, a0*a1+b0*b1
|
|
|
|
// to r1,r2, and a1*b1 to r2,r3. The middle term we will compute as:
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// a0*a1 + b0*b1 = (a0 - a1)*(b1 - b0) + a1*b1 + a0*b0
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Note that we know |n| >= |BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL|/2 above, so
|
|
|
|
// |tna| and |tnb| are non-negative.
|
|
|
|
int n = n2 / 2, tna = n + dna, tnb = n + dnb;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// t0 = a0 - a1 and t1 = b1 - b0. The result will be multiplied, so we XOR
|
|
|
|
// their sign masks, giving the sign of (a0 - a1)*(b1 - b0). t0 and t1
|
|
|
|
// themselves store the absolute value.
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG neg = bn_abs_sub_part_words(t, a, &a[n], tna, n - tna, &t[n2]);
|
|
|
|
neg ^= bn_abs_sub_part_words(&t[n], &b[n], b, tnb, tnb - n, &t[n2]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Compute:
|
|
|
|
// t2,t3 = t0 * t1 = |(a0 - a1)*(b1 - b0)|
|
|
|
|
// r0,r1 = a0 * b0
|
|
|
|
// r2,r3 = a1 * b1
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (n == 4 && dna == 0 && dnb == 0) {
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba4(&t[n2], t, &t[n]);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba4(r, a, b);
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba4(&r[n2], &a[n], &b[n]);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
} else if (n == 8 && dna == 0 && dnb == 0) {
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba8(&t[n2], t, &t[n]);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba8(r, a, b);
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba8(&r[n2], &a[n], &b[n]);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
BN_ULONG *p = &t[n2 * 2];
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_recursive(&t[n2], t, &t[n], n, 0, 0, p);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_recursive(r, a, b, n, 0, 0, p);
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_recursive(&r[n2], &a[n], &b[n], n, dna, dnb, p);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
// t0,t1,c = r0,r1 + r2,r3 = a0*b0 + a1*b1
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG c = bn_add_words(t, r, &r[n2], n2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// t2,t3,c = t0,t1,c + neg*t2,t3 = (a0 - a1)*(b1 - b0) + a1*b1 + a0*b0.
|
|
|
|
// The second term is stored as the absolute value, so we do this with a
|
|
|
|
// constant-time select.
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG c_neg = c - bn_sub_words(&t[n2 * 2], t, &t[n2], n2);
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG c_pos = c + bn_add_words(&t[n2], t, &t[n2], n2);
|
|
|
|
bn_select_words(&t[n2], neg, &t[n2 * 2], &t[n2], n2);
|
|
|
|
OPENSSL_COMPILE_ASSERT(sizeof(BN_ULONG) <= sizeof(crypto_word_t),
|
|
|
|
crypto_word_t_too_small);
|
|
|
|
c = constant_time_select_w(neg, c_neg, c_pos);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We now have our three components. Add them together.
|
|
|
|
// r1,r2,c = r1,r2 + t2,t3,c
|
|
|
|
c += bn_add_words(&r[n], &r[n], &t[n2], n2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Propagate the carry bit to the end.
|
|
|
|
for (int i = n + n2; i < n2 + n2; i++) {
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG old = r[i];
|
|
|
|
r[i] = old + c;
|
|
|
|
c = r[i] < old;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Make bn_mul_recursive constant-time.
I left the input length as int because the calling convention passes
these messy deltas around. This micro-optimization is almost certainly
pointless, but bn_sub_part_words is written in assembly, so I've left it
alone for now. The documented preconditions were also all completely
wrong, so I've fixed them. We actually only call them for even tighter
bounds (one of dna or dnb is 0 and the other is 0 or -1), at least
outside bn_mul_part_recursive which I still need to read through.
This leaves bn_mul_part_recursive, which is reachable for RSA keys which
are not a power of two in bit width.
The first iteration of this had an uncaught bug, so I added a few more
aggressive tests generated with:
A = 0x...
B = 0x...
# Chop off 0, 1 and > 1 word for both 32 and 64-bit.
for i in (0, 1, 2, 4):
for j in (0, 1, 2, 4):
a = A >> (32*i)
b = B >> (32*j)
p = a * b
print "Product = %x" % p
print "A = %x" % a
print "B = %x" % b
print
Bug: 234
Change-Id: I72848d992637c0390cdd3c4f81cb919393b59eb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-26 13:30:55 +00:00
|
|
|
// The product should fit without carries.
|
|
|
|
assert(c == 0);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// bn_mul_part_recursive sets |r| to |a| * |b|, using |t| as scratch space. |r|
|
|
|
|
// has length 4*|n|, |a| has length |n| + |tna|, |b| has length |n| + |tnb|, and
|
|
|
|
// |t| has length 8*|n|. |n| must be a power of two. Additionally, we must have
|
|
|
|
// 0 <= tna < n and 0 <= tnb < n, and |tna| and |tnb| must differ by at most
|
|
|
|
// one.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// TODO(davidben): Make this take |size_t| and perhaps the actual lengths of |a|
|
|
|
|
// and |b|.
|
2017-11-12 03:12:08 +00:00
|
|
|
static void bn_mul_part_recursive(BN_ULONG *r, const BN_ULONG *a,
|
|
|
|
const BN_ULONG *b, int n, int tna, int tnb,
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG *t) {
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// |n| is a power of two.
|
|
|
|
assert(n != 0 && (n & (n - 1)) == 0);
|
|
|
|
// Check |tna| and |tnb| are in range.
|
|
|
|
assert(0 <= tna && tna < n);
|
|
|
|
assert(0 <= tnb && tnb < n);
|
|
|
|
assert(-1 <= tna - tnb && tna - tnb <= 1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int n2 = n * 2;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (n < 8) {
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_normal(r, a, n + tna, b, n + tnb);
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
OPENSSL_memset(r + n2 + tna + tnb, 0, n2 - tna - tnb);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// Split |a| and |b| into a0,a1 and b0,b1, where a0 and b0 have size |n|. |a1|
|
|
|
|
// and |b1| have size |tna| and |tnb|, respectively.
|
|
|
|
// Split |t| into t0,t1,t2,t3, each of size |n|, with the remaining 4*|n| used
|
|
|
|
// for recursive calls.
|
|
|
|
// Split |r| into r0,r1,r2,r3. We must contribute a0*b0 to r0,r1, a0*a1+b0*b1
|
|
|
|
// to r1,r2, and a1*b1 to r2,r3. The middle term we will compute as:
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// a0*a1 + b0*b1 = (a0 - a1)*(b1 - b0) + a1*b1 + a0*b0
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// t0 = a0 - a1 and t1 = b1 - b0. The result will be multiplied, so we XOR
|
|
|
|
// their sign masks, giving the sign of (a0 - a1)*(b1 - b0). t0 and t1
|
|
|
|
// themselves store the absolute value.
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG neg = bn_abs_sub_part_words(t, a, &a[n], tna, n - tna, &t[n2]);
|
|
|
|
neg ^= bn_abs_sub_part_words(&t[n], &b[n], b, tnb, tnb - n, &t[n2]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Compute:
|
|
|
|
// t2,t3 = t0 * t1 = |(a0 - a1)*(b1 - b0)|
|
|
|
|
// r0,r1 = a0 * b0
|
|
|
|
// r2,r3 = a1 * b1
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (n == 8) {
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba8(&t[n2], t, &t[n]);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba8(r, a, b);
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_normal(&r[n2], &a[n], tna, &b[n], tnb);
|
|
|
|
// |bn_mul_normal| only writes |tna| + |tna| words. Zero the rest.
|
|
|
|
OPENSSL_memset(&r[n2 + tna + tnb], 0, sizeof(BN_ULONG) * (n2 - tna - tnb));
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
BN_ULONG *p = &t[n2 * 2];
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_recursive(&t[n2], t, &t[n], n, 0, 0, p);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_recursive(r, a, b, n, 0, 0, p);
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 19:12:18 +00:00
|
|
|
OPENSSL_memset(&r[n2], 0, sizeof(BN_ULONG) * n2);
|
|
|
|
if (tna < BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL &&
|
|
|
|
tnb < BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL) {
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_normal(&r[n2], &a[n], tna, &b[n], tnb);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2018-01-26 19:12:18 +00:00
|
|
|
int i = n;
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
|
|
i /= 2;
|
|
|
|
if (i < tna || i < tnb) {
|
|
|
|
// E.g., n == 16, i == 8 and tna == 11. |tna| and |tnb| are within one
|
|
|
|
// of each other, so if |tna| is larger and tna > i, then we know
|
|
|
|
// tnb >= i, and this call is valid.
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_part_recursive(&r[n2], &a[n], &b[n], i, tna - i, tnb - i, p);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (i == tna || i == tnb) {
|
|
|
|
// If there is only a bottom half to the number, just do it. We know
|
|
|
|
// the larger of |tna - i| and |tnb - i| is zero. The other is zero or
|
|
|
|
// -1 by because of |tna| and |tnb| differ by at most one.
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_recursive(&r[n2], &a[n], &b[n], i, tna - i, tnb - i, p);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-26 19:12:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This loop will eventually terminate when |i| falls below
|
|
|
|
// |BN_MUL_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL| because we know one of |tna| and |tnb|
|
|
|
|
// exceeds that.
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// t0,t1,c = r0,r1 + r2,r3 = a0*b0 + a1*b1
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG c = bn_add_words(t, r, &r[n2], n2);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// t2,t3,c = t0,t1,c + neg*t2,t3 = (a0 - a1)*(b1 - b0) + a1*b1 + a0*b0.
|
|
|
|
// The second term is stored as the absolute value, so we do this with a
|
|
|
|
// constant-time select.
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG c_neg = c - bn_sub_words(&t[n2 * 2], t, &t[n2], n2);
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG c_pos = c + bn_add_words(&t[n2], t, &t[n2], n2);
|
|
|
|
bn_select_words(&t[n2], neg, &t[n2 * 2], &t[n2], n2);
|
|
|
|
OPENSSL_COMPILE_ASSERT(sizeof(BN_ULONG) <= sizeof(crypto_word_t),
|
|
|
|
crypto_word_t_too_small);
|
|
|
|
c = constant_time_select_w(neg, c_neg, c_pos);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// We now have our three components. Add them together.
|
|
|
|
// r1,r2,c = r1,r2 + t2,t3,c
|
|
|
|
c += bn_add_words(&r[n], &r[n], &t[n2], n2);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// Propagate the carry bit to the end.
|
|
|
|
for (int i = n + n2; i < n2 + n2; i++) {
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG old = r[i];
|
|
|
|
r[i] = old + c;
|
|
|
|
c = r[i] < old;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The product should fit without carries.
|
|
|
|
assert(c == 0);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-06 23:56:10 +00:00
|
|
|
// bn_mul_impl implements |BN_mul| and |bn_mul_consttime|. Note this function
|
|
|
|
// breaks |BIGNUM| invariants and may return a negative zero. This is handled by
|
|
|
|
// the callers.
|
2018-01-24 17:10:56 +00:00
|
|
|
static int bn_mul_impl(BIGNUM *r, const BIGNUM *a, const BIGNUM *b,
|
|
|
|
BN_CTX *ctx) {
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
int al = a->width;
|
|
|
|
int bl = b->width;
|
|
|
|
if (al == 0 || bl == 0) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
BN_zero(r);
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
BIGNUM *rr;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
BN_CTX_start(ctx);
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
if (r == a || r == b) {
|
|
|
|
rr = BN_CTX_get(ctx);
|
|
|
|
if (r == NULL) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
rr = r;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rr->neg = a->neg ^ b->neg;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
int i = al - bl;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (i == 0) {
|
|
|
|
if (al == 8) {
|
2017-04-21 16:26:30 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!bn_wexpand(rr, 16)) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-15 10:23:24 +00:00
|
|
|
rr->width = 16;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba8(rr->d, a->d, b->d);
|
|
|
|
goto end;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
int top = al + bl;
|
2016-02-05 21:25:51 +00:00
|
|
|
static const int kMulNormalSize = 16;
|
|
|
|
if (al >= kMulNormalSize && bl >= kMulNormalSize) {
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
if (-1 <= i && i <= 1) {
|
|
|
|
// Find the larger power of two less than or equal to the larger length.
|
|
|
|
int j;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (i >= 0) {
|
|
|
|
j = BN_num_bits_word((BN_ULONG)al);
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
j = BN_num_bits_word((BN_ULONG)bl);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
j = 1 << (j - 1);
|
|
|
|
assert(j <= al || j <= bl);
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
BIGNUM *t = BN_CTX_get(ctx);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (t == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (al > j || bl > j) {
|
2018-01-26 16:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
// We know |al| and |bl| are at most one from each other, so if al > j,
|
|
|
|
// bl >= j, and vice versa. Thus we can use |bn_mul_part_recursive|.
|
|
|
|
assert(al >= j && bl >= j);
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!bn_wexpand(t, j * 8) ||
|
2018-01-26 19:03:26 +00:00
|
|
|
!bn_wexpand(rr, j * 4)) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_part_recursive(rr->d, a->d, b->d, j, al - j, bl - j, t->d);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2018-01-26 13:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
// al <= j && bl <= j. Additionally, we know j <= al or j <= bl, so one
|
|
|
|
// of al - j or bl - j is zero. The other, by the bound on |i| above, is
|
|
|
|
// zero or -1. Thus, we can use |bn_mul_recursive|.
|
|
|
|
if (!bn_wexpand(t, j * 4) ||
|
|
|
|
!bn_wexpand(rr, j * 2)) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_recursive(rr->d, a->d, b->d, j, al - j, bl - j, t->d);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-15 10:23:24 +00:00
|
|
|
rr->width = top;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
goto end;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-04-21 16:26:30 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!bn_wexpand(rr, top)) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-15 10:23:24 +00:00
|
|
|
rr->width = top;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
bn_mul_normal(rr->d, a->d, al, b->d, bl);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end:
|
2015-06-12 02:42:14 +01:00
|
|
|
if (r != rr && !BN_copy(r, rr)) {
|
|
|
|
goto err;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err:
|
|
|
|
BN_CTX_end(ctx);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-24 17:10:56 +00:00
|
|
|
int BN_mul(BIGNUM *r, const BIGNUM *a, const BIGNUM *b, BN_CTX *ctx) {
|
|
|
|
if (!bn_mul_impl(r, a, b, ctx)) {
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This additionally fixes any negative zeros created by |bn_mul_impl|.
|
|
|
|
bn_set_minimal_width(r);
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-06 23:56:10 +00:00
|
|
|
int bn_mul_consttime(BIGNUM *r, const BIGNUM *a, const BIGNUM *b, BN_CTX *ctx) {
|
2018-01-24 17:10:56 +00:00
|
|
|
// Prevent negative zeros.
|
|
|
|
if (a->neg || b->neg) {
|
|
|
|
OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(BN, BN_R_NEGATIVE_NUMBER);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return bn_mul_impl(r, a, b, ctx);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-12 03:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
int bn_mul_small(BN_ULONG *r, size_t num_r, const BN_ULONG *a, size_t num_a,
|
|
|
|
const BN_ULONG *b, size_t num_b) {
|
|
|
|
if (num_r != num_a + num_b) {
|
|
|
|
OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(BN, ERR_R_SHOULD_NOT_HAVE_BEEN_CALLED);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(davidben): Should this call |bn_mul_comba4| too? |BN_mul| does not
|
|
|
|
// hit that code.
|
|
|
|
if (num_a == 8 && num_b == 8) {
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_comba8(r, a, b);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
bn_mul_normal(r, a, num_a, b, num_b);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-18 19:06:02 +01:00
|
|
|
// tmp must have 2*n words
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
static void bn_sqr_normal(BN_ULONG *r, const BN_ULONG *a, size_t n,
|
2017-11-09 22:07:54 +00:00
|
|
|
BN_ULONG *tmp) {
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (n == 0) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
size_t max = n * 2;
|
2017-11-09 22:07:54 +00:00
|
|
|
const BN_ULONG *ap = a;
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG *rp = r;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
rp[0] = rp[max - 1] = 0;
|
|
|
|
rp++;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-09 22:07:54 +00:00
|
|
|
// Compute the contribution of a[i] * a[j] for all i < j.
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (n > 1) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
ap++;
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
rp[n - 1] = bn_mul_words(rp, ap, n - 1, ap[-1]);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
rp += 2;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-12 01:18:42 +00:00
|
|
|
if (n > 2) {
|
|
|
|
for (size_t i = n - 2; i > 0; i--) {
|
|
|
|
ap++;
|
|
|
|
rp[i] = bn_mul_add_words(rp, ap, i, ap[-1]);
|
|
|
|
rp += 2;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-09 22:07:54 +00:00
|
|
|
// The final result fits in |max| words, so none of the following operations
|
|
|
|
// will overflow.
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-09 22:07:54 +00:00
|
|
|
// Double |r|, giving the contribution of a[i] * a[j] for all i != j.
|
|
|
|
bn_add_words(r, r, r, max);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-09 22:07:54 +00:00
|
|
|
// Add in the contribution of a[i] * a[i] for all i.
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
bn_sqr_words(tmp, a, n);
|
|
|
|
bn_add_words(r, r, tmp, max);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// bn_sqr_recursive sets |r| to |a|^2, using |t| as scratch space. |r| has
|
|
|
|
// length 2*|n2|, |a| has length |n2|, and |t| has length 4*|n2|. |n2| must be
|
|
|
|
// a power of two.
|
|
|
|
static void bn_sqr_recursive(BN_ULONG *r, const BN_ULONG *a, size_t n2,
|
2017-11-09 22:07:54 +00:00
|
|
|
BN_ULONG *t) {
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// |n2| is a power of two.
|
|
|
|
assert(n2 != 0 && (n2 & (n2 - 1)) == 0);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (n2 == 4) {
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_comba4(r, a);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (n2 == 8) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
bn_sqr_comba8(r, a);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (n2 < BN_SQR_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL) {
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_normal(r, a, n2, t);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-24 17:10:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// Split |a| into a0,a1, each of size |n|.
|
|
|
|
// Split |t| into t0,t1,t2,t3, each of size |n|, with the remaining 4*|n| used
|
|
|
|
// for recursive calls.
|
|
|
|
// Split |r| into r0,r1,r2,r3. We must contribute a0^2 to r0,r1, 2*a0*a1 to
|
|
|
|
// r1,r2, and a1^2 to r2,r3.
|
|
|
|
size_t n = n2 / 2;
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG *t_recursive = &t[n2 * 2];
|
2018-01-24 17:10:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// t0 = |a0 - a1|.
|
|
|
|
bn_abs_sub_words(t, a, &a[n], n, &t[n]);
|
|
|
|
// t2,t3 = t0^2 = |a0 - a1|^2 = a0^2 - 2*a0*a1 + a1^2
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_recursive(&t[n2], t, n, t_recursive);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// r0,r1 = a0^2
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_recursive(r, a, n, t_recursive);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// r2,r3 = a1^2
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_recursive(&r[n2], &a[n], n, t_recursive);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// t0,t1,c = r0,r1 + r2,r3 = a0^2 + a1^2
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG c = bn_add_words(t, r, &r[n2], n2);
|
|
|
|
// t2,t3,c = t0,t1,c - t2,t3 = 2*a0*a1
|
|
|
|
c -= bn_sub_words(&t[n2], t, &t[n2], n2);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// We now have our three components. Add them together.
|
|
|
|
// r1,r2,c = r1,r2 + t2,t3,c
|
|
|
|
c += bn_add_words(&r[n], &r[n], &t[n2], n2);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// Propagate the carry bit to the end.
|
|
|
|
for (size_t i = n + n2; i < n2 + n2; i++) {
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG old = r[i];
|
|
|
|
r[i] = old + c;
|
|
|
|
c = r[i] < old;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The square should fit without carries.
|
|
|
|
assert(c == 0);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int BN_mul_word(BIGNUM *bn, BN_ULONG w) {
|
2018-01-15 10:23:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!bn->width) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (w == 0) {
|
|
|
|
BN_zero(bn);
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-15 10:23:24 +00:00
|
|
|
BN_ULONG ll = bn_mul_words(bn->d, bn->d, bn->width, w);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (ll) {
|
2018-01-15 10:23:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!bn_wexpand(bn, bn->width + 1)) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-15 10:23:24 +00:00
|
|
|
bn->d[bn->width++] = ll;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-06 23:56:10 +00:00
|
|
|
int bn_sqr_consttime(BIGNUM *r, const BIGNUM *a, BN_CTX *ctx) {
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
int al = a->width;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (al <= 0) {
|
2018-01-15 10:23:24 +00:00
|
|
|
r->width = 0;
|
2014-07-25 00:06:47 +01:00
|
|
|
r->neg = 0;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
BN_CTX_start(ctx);
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
BIGNUM *rr = (a != r) ? r : BN_CTX_get(ctx);
|
|
|
|
BIGNUM *tmp = BN_CTX_get(ctx);
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!rr || !tmp) {
|
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
int max = 2 * al; // Non-zero (from above)
|
2017-04-21 16:26:30 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!bn_wexpand(rr, max)) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (al == 4) {
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_comba4(rr->d, a->d);
|
|
|
|
} else if (al == 8) {
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_comba8(rr->d, a->d);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
if (al < BN_SQR_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL) {
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG t[BN_SQR_RECURSIVE_SIZE_NORMAL * 2];
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_normal(rr->d, a->d, al, t);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2018-01-26 04:56:35 +00:00
|
|
|
// If |al| is a power of two, we can use |bn_sqr_recursive|.
|
|
|
|
if (al != 0 && (al & (al - 1)) == 0) {
|
|
|
|
if (!bn_wexpand(tmp, al * 4)) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_recursive(rr->d, a->d, al, tmp->d);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2017-04-21 16:26:30 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!bn_wexpand(tmp, max)) {
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
goto err;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_normal(rr->d, a->d, al, tmp->d);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rr->neg = 0;
|
2018-01-15 10:23:24 +00:00
|
|
|
rr->width = max;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-06-12 02:42:14 +01:00
|
|
|
if (rr != r && !BN_copy(r, rr)) {
|
|
|
|
goto err;
|
2014-06-20 20:00:00 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err:
|
|
|
|
BN_CTX_end(ctx);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-12 03:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-24 17:10:56 +00:00
|
|
|
int BN_sqr(BIGNUM *r, const BIGNUM *a, BN_CTX *ctx) {
|
2018-02-06 23:56:10 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!bn_sqr_consttime(r, a, ctx)) {
|
2018-01-24 17:10:56 +00:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bn_set_minimal_width(r);
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-12 03:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
int bn_sqr_small(BN_ULONG *r, size_t num_r, const BN_ULONG *a, size_t num_a) {
|
|
|
|
if (num_r != 2 * num_a || num_a > BN_SMALL_MAX_WORDS) {
|
|
|
|
OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(BN, ERR_R_SHOULD_NOT_HAVE_BEEN_CALLED);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (num_a == 4) {
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_comba4(r, a);
|
|
|
|
} else if (num_a == 8) {
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_comba8(r, a);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
BN_ULONG tmp[2 * BN_SMALL_MAX_WORDS];
|
|
|
|
bn_sqr_normal(r, a, num_a, tmp);
|
|
|
|
OPENSSL_cleanse(tmp, 2 * num_a * sizeof(BN_ULONG));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|