boringssl/third_party/fiat/make_curve25519_tables.py

239 lines
6.9 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python
# coding=utf-8
# The MIT License (MIT)
#
# Copyright (c) 2015-2016 the fiat-crypto authors (see the AUTHORS file).
#
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
# of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
# in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
# to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
# copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
# furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
#
# The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
# copies or substantial portions of the Software.
#
# THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
# IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
# FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
# AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
# LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
# OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
# SOFTWARE.
import StringIO
import subprocess
# Base field Z_p
p = 2**255 - 19
def modp_inv(x):
return pow(x, p-2, p)
# Square root of -1
modp_sqrt_m1 = pow(2, (p-1) // 4, p)
# Compute corresponding x-coordinate, with low bit corresponding to
# sign, or return None on failure
def recover_x(y, sign):
if y >= p:
return None
x2 = (y*y-1) * modp_inv(d*y*y+1)
if x2 == 0:
if sign:
return None
else:
return 0
# Compute square root of x2
x = pow(x2, (p+3) // 8, p)
if (x*x - x2) % p != 0:
x = x * modp_sqrt_m1 % p
if (x*x - x2) % p != 0:
return None
if (x & 1) != sign:
x = p - x
return x
# Curve constant
d = -121665 * modp_inv(121666) % p
# Base point
g_y = 4 * modp_inv(5) % p
g_x = recover_x(g_y, 0)
# Points are represented as affine tuples (x, y).
def point_add(P, Q):
x1, y1 = P
x2, y2 = Q
x3 = ((x1*y2 + y1*x2) * modp_inv(1 + d*x1*x2*y1*y2)) % p
y3 = ((y1*y2 + x1*x2) * modp_inv(1 - d*x1*x2*y1*y2)) % p
return (x3, y3)
# Computes Q = s * P
def point_mul(s, P):
Q = (0, 1) # Neutral element
while s > 0:
if s & 1:
Q = point_add(Q, P)
P = point_add(P, P)
s >>= 1
return Q
def to_bytes(x):
ret = bytearray(32)
for i in range(len(ret)):
ret[i] = x % 256
x >>= 8
assert x == 0
return ret
def to_ge_precomp(P):
# typedef struct {
# fe_loose yplusx;
# fe_loose yminusx;
# fe_loose xy2d;
# } ge_precomp;
x, y = P
return ((y + x) % p, (y - x) % p, (x * y * 2 * d) % p)
def to_base_25_5(x):
limbs = (26, 25, 26, 25, 26, 25, 26, 25, 26, 25)
ret = []
for l in limbs:
ret.append(x & ((1<<l) - 1))
x >>= l
assert x == 0
return ret
Use 51-bit limbs from fiat-crypto in 64-bit. Our 64-bit performance was much lower than it could have been, since we weren't using the 64-bit multipliers. Fortunately, fiat-crypto is awesome, so this is just a matter of synthesizing new code and integration work. Functions without the signature fiat-crypto curly braces were written by hand and warrant more review. (It's just redistributing some bits.) These use the donna variants which takes (and proves) some of the instruction scheduling from donna as that's significantly faster. Glancing over things, I suspect but have not confirmed the gap is due to this: https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto/pull/295#issuecomment-356892413 Clang without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 105149 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5025208us (20924.3 ops/sec) Did 125000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5024003us (24880.6 ops/sec) Did 37642 Ed25519 verify operations in 5072539us (7420.7 ops/sec) After: Did 206000 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5020547us (41031.4 ops/sec) Did 227000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5005232us (45352.5 ops/sec) Did 69840 Ed25519 verify operations in 5004769us (13954.7 ops/sec) Clang + OPENSSL_SMALL: Before: Did 68598 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024629us (13652.4 ops/sec) Did 73000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5067837us (14404.6 ops/sec) Did 36765 Ed25519 verify operations in 5078684us (7239.1 ops/sec) Did 74000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5016465us (14751.4 ops/sec) Did 45600 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5034680us (9057.2 ops/sec) After: Did 117315 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5021860us (23360.9 ops/sec) Did 126000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5003521us (25182.3 ops/sec) Did 64974 Ed25519 verify operations in 5047790us (12871.8 ops/sec) Did 134000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5058946us (26487.7 ops/sec) Did 86000 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5050478us (17028.1 ops/sec) GCC without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 35552 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5030756us (7066.9 ops/sec) Did 38286 Ed25519 signing operations in 5001648us (7654.7 ops/sec) Did 10584 Ed25519 verify operations in 5068158us (2088.3 ops/sec) After: Did 92158 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024021us (18343.5 ops/sec) Did 99000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5011908us (19753.0 ops/sec) Did 31122 Ed25519 verify operations in 5069878us (6138.6 ops/sec) Change-Id: Ic0c24d50b4ee2bbc408b94965e9d63319936107d Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24805 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-09 22:27:21 +00:00
def to_base_51(x):
ret = []
for _ in range(5):
ret.append(x & ((1<<51) - 1))
x >>= 51
assert x == 0
return ret
def to_literal(x):
ret = "{{\n#if defined(BORINGSSL_CURVE25519_64BIT)\n"
ret += ", ".join(map(str, to_base_51(x)))
ret += "\n#else\n"
ret += ", ".join(map(str, to_base_25_5(x)))
ret += "\n#endif\n}}"
return ret
def main():
d2 = (2 * d) % p
small_precomp = bytearray()
for i in range(1, 16):
s = (i&1) | ((i&2) << (64-1)) | ((i&4) << (128-2)) | ((i&8) << (192-3))
P = point_mul(s, (g_x, g_y))
small_precomp += to_bytes(P[0])
small_precomp += to_bytes(P[1])
large_precomp = []
for i in range(32):
large_precomp.append([])
for j in range(8):
P = point_mul((j + 1) << (i * 8), (g_x, g_y))
large_precomp[-1].append(to_ge_precomp(P))
bi_precomp = []
for i in range(8):
P = point_mul(2*i + 1, (g_x, g_y))
bi_precomp.append(to_ge_precomp(P))
buf = StringIO.StringIO()
buf.write("""// The MIT License (MIT)
//
// Copyright (c) 2015-2016 the fiat-crypto authors (see the AUTHORS file).
//
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
// of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
// in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
// to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
// copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
// furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
//
// The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
// all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
//
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
// AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
// LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
// OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
// SOFTWARE.
// This file is generated from
// ./make_curve25519_tables.py > curve25519_tables.h
Use 51-bit limbs from fiat-crypto in 64-bit. Our 64-bit performance was much lower than it could have been, since we weren't using the 64-bit multipliers. Fortunately, fiat-crypto is awesome, so this is just a matter of synthesizing new code and integration work. Functions without the signature fiat-crypto curly braces were written by hand and warrant more review. (It's just redistributing some bits.) These use the donna variants which takes (and proves) some of the instruction scheduling from donna as that's significantly faster. Glancing over things, I suspect but have not confirmed the gap is due to this: https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto/pull/295#issuecomment-356892413 Clang without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 105149 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5025208us (20924.3 ops/sec) Did 125000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5024003us (24880.6 ops/sec) Did 37642 Ed25519 verify operations in 5072539us (7420.7 ops/sec) After: Did 206000 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5020547us (41031.4 ops/sec) Did 227000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5005232us (45352.5 ops/sec) Did 69840 Ed25519 verify operations in 5004769us (13954.7 ops/sec) Clang + OPENSSL_SMALL: Before: Did 68598 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024629us (13652.4 ops/sec) Did 73000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5067837us (14404.6 ops/sec) Did 36765 Ed25519 verify operations in 5078684us (7239.1 ops/sec) Did 74000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5016465us (14751.4 ops/sec) Did 45600 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5034680us (9057.2 ops/sec) After: Did 117315 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5021860us (23360.9 ops/sec) Did 126000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5003521us (25182.3 ops/sec) Did 64974 Ed25519 verify operations in 5047790us (12871.8 ops/sec) Did 134000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5058946us (26487.7 ops/sec) Did 86000 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5050478us (17028.1 ops/sec) GCC without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 35552 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5030756us (7066.9 ops/sec) Did 38286 Ed25519 signing operations in 5001648us (7654.7 ops/sec) Did 10584 Ed25519 verify operations in 5068158us (2088.3 ops/sec) After: Did 92158 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024021us (18343.5 ops/sec) Did 99000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5011908us (19753.0 ops/sec) Did 31122 Ed25519 verify operations in 5069878us (6138.6 ops/sec) Change-Id: Ic0c24d50b4ee2bbc408b94965e9d63319936107d Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24805 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-09 22:27:21 +00:00
static const fe d = """)
buf.write(to_literal(d))
buf.write(""";
Use 51-bit limbs from fiat-crypto in 64-bit. Our 64-bit performance was much lower than it could have been, since we weren't using the 64-bit multipliers. Fortunately, fiat-crypto is awesome, so this is just a matter of synthesizing new code and integration work. Functions without the signature fiat-crypto curly braces were written by hand and warrant more review. (It's just redistributing some bits.) These use the donna variants which takes (and proves) some of the instruction scheduling from donna as that's significantly faster. Glancing over things, I suspect but have not confirmed the gap is due to this: https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto/pull/295#issuecomment-356892413 Clang without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 105149 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5025208us (20924.3 ops/sec) Did 125000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5024003us (24880.6 ops/sec) Did 37642 Ed25519 verify operations in 5072539us (7420.7 ops/sec) After: Did 206000 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5020547us (41031.4 ops/sec) Did 227000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5005232us (45352.5 ops/sec) Did 69840 Ed25519 verify operations in 5004769us (13954.7 ops/sec) Clang + OPENSSL_SMALL: Before: Did 68598 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024629us (13652.4 ops/sec) Did 73000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5067837us (14404.6 ops/sec) Did 36765 Ed25519 verify operations in 5078684us (7239.1 ops/sec) Did 74000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5016465us (14751.4 ops/sec) Did 45600 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5034680us (9057.2 ops/sec) After: Did 117315 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5021860us (23360.9 ops/sec) Did 126000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5003521us (25182.3 ops/sec) Did 64974 Ed25519 verify operations in 5047790us (12871.8 ops/sec) Did 134000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5058946us (26487.7 ops/sec) Did 86000 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5050478us (17028.1 ops/sec) GCC without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 35552 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5030756us (7066.9 ops/sec) Did 38286 Ed25519 signing operations in 5001648us (7654.7 ops/sec) Did 10584 Ed25519 verify operations in 5068158us (2088.3 ops/sec) After: Did 92158 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024021us (18343.5 ops/sec) Did 99000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5011908us (19753.0 ops/sec) Did 31122 Ed25519 verify operations in 5069878us (6138.6 ops/sec) Change-Id: Ic0c24d50b4ee2bbc408b94965e9d63319936107d Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24805 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-09 22:27:21 +00:00
static const fe sqrtm1 = """)
buf.write(to_literal(modp_sqrt_m1))
buf.write(""";
Use 51-bit limbs from fiat-crypto in 64-bit. Our 64-bit performance was much lower than it could have been, since we weren't using the 64-bit multipliers. Fortunately, fiat-crypto is awesome, so this is just a matter of synthesizing new code and integration work. Functions without the signature fiat-crypto curly braces were written by hand and warrant more review. (It's just redistributing some bits.) These use the donna variants which takes (and proves) some of the instruction scheduling from donna as that's significantly faster. Glancing over things, I suspect but have not confirmed the gap is due to this: https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto/pull/295#issuecomment-356892413 Clang without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 105149 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5025208us (20924.3 ops/sec) Did 125000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5024003us (24880.6 ops/sec) Did 37642 Ed25519 verify operations in 5072539us (7420.7 ops/sec) After: Did 206000 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5020547us (41031.4 ops/sec) Did 227000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5005232us (45352.5 ops/sec) Did 69840 Ed25519 verify operations in 5004769us (13954.7 ops/sec) Clang + OPENSSL_SMALL: Before: Did 68598 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024629us (13652.4 ops/sec) Did 73000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5067837us (14404.6 ops/sec) Did 36765 Ed25519 verify operations in 5078684us (7239.1 ops/sec) Did 74000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5016465us (14751.4 ops/sec) Did 45600 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5034680us (9057.2 ops/sec) After: Did 117315 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5021860us (23360.9 ops/sec) Did 126000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5003521us (25182.3 ops/sec) Did 64974 Ed25519 verify operations in 5047790us (12871.8 ops/sec) Did 134000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5058946us (26487.7 ops/sec) Did 86000 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5050478us (17028.1 ops/sec) GCC without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 35552 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5030756us (7066.9 ops/sec) Did 38286 Ed25519 signing operations in 5001648us (7654.7 ops/sec) Did 10584 Ed25519 verify operations in 5068158us (2088.3 ops/sec) After: Did 92158 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024021us (18343.5 ops/sec) Did 99000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5011908us (19753.0 ops/sec) Did 31122 Ed25519 verify operations in 5069878us (6138.6 ops/sec) Change-Id: Ic0c24d50b4ee2bbc408b94965e9d63319936107d Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24805 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-09 22:27:21 +00:00
static const fe d2 = """)
buf.write(to_literal(d2))
buf.write(""";
#if defined(OPENSSL_SMALL)
// This block of code replaces the standard base-point table with a much smaller
// one. The standard table is 30,720 bytes while this one is just 960.
//
// This table contains 15 pairs of group elements, (x, y), where each field
// element is serialised with |fe_tobytes|. If |i| is the index of the group
// element then consider i+1 as a four-bit number: (i₀, i₁, i₂, i₃) (where i₀
// is the most significant bit). The value of the group element is then:
// (i₀×2^192 + i₁×2^128 + i₂×2^64 + i₃)G, where G is the generator.
static const uint8_t k25519SmallPrecomp[15 * 2 * 32] = {""")
for i, b in enumerate(small_precomp):
buf.write("0x%02x, " % b)
buf.write("""
};
#else
// k25519Precomp[i][j] = (j+1)*256^i*B
static const ge_precomp k25519Precomp[32][8] = {
""")
for child in large_precomp:
buf.write("{\n")
for val in child:
buf.write("{\n")
for term in val:
Use 51-bit limbs from fiat-crypto in 64-bit. Our 64-bit performance was much lower than it could have been, since we weren't using the 64-bit multipliers. Fortunately, fiat-crypto is awesome, so this is just a matter of synthesizing new code and integration work. Functions without the signature fiat-crypto curly braces were written by hand and warrant more review. (It's just redistributing some bits.) These use the donna variants which takes (and proves) some of the instruction scheduling from donna as that's significantly faster. Glancing over things, I suspect but have not confirmed the gap is due to this: https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto/pull/295#issuecomment-356892413 Clang without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 105149 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5025208us (20924.3 ops/sec) Did 125000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5024003us (24880.6 ops/sec) Did 37642 Ed25519 verify operations in 5072539us (7420.7 ops/sec) After: Did 206000 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5020547us (41031.4 ops/sec) Did 227000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5005232us (45352.5 ops/sec) Did 69840 Ed25519 verify operations in 5004769us (13954.7 ops/sec) Clang + OPENSSL_SMALL: Before: Did 68598 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024629us (13652.4 ops/sec) Did 73000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5067837us (14404.6 ops/sec) Did 36765 Ed25519 verify operations in 5078684us (7239.1 ops/sec) Did 74000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5016465us (14751.4 ops/sec) Did 45600 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5034680us (9057.2 ops/sec) After: Did 117315 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5021860us (23360.9 ops/sec) Did 126000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5003521us (25182.3 ops/sec) Did 64974 Ed25519 verify operations in 5047790us (12871.8 ops/sec) Did 134000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5058946us (26487.7 ops/sec) Did 86000 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5050478us (17028.1 ops/sec) GCC without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 35552 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5030756us (7066.9 ops/sec) Did 38286 Ed25519 signing operations in 5001648us (7654.7 ops/sec) Did 10584 Ed25519 verify operations in 5068158us (2088.3 ops/sec) After: Did 92158 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024021us (18343.5 ops/sec) Did 99000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5011908us (19753.0 ops/sec) Did 31122 Ed25519 verify operations in 5069878us (6138.6 ops/sec) Change-Id: Ic0c24d50b4ee2bbc408b94965e9d63319936107d Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24805 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-09 22:27:21 +00:00
buf.write(to_literal(term) + ",\n")
buf.write("},\n")
buf.write("},\n")
buf.write("""};
#endif // OPENSSL_SMALL
// Bi[i] = (2*i+1)*B
static const ge_precomp Bi[8] = {
""")
for val in bi_precomp:
buf.write("{\n")
for term in val:
Use 51-bit limbs from fiat-crypto in 64-bit. Our 64-bit performance was much lower than it could have been, since we weren't using the 64-bit multipliers. Fortunately, fiat-crypto is awesome, so this is just a matter of synthesizing new code and integration work. Functions without the signature fiat-crypto curly braces were written by hand and warrant more review. (It's just redistributing some bits.) These use the donna variants which takes (and proves) some of the instruction scheduling from donna as that's significantly faster. Glancing over things, I suspect but have not confirmed the gap is due to this: https://github.com/mit-plv/fiat-crypto/pull/295#issuecomment-356892413 Clang without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 105149 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5025208us (20924.3 ops/sec) Did 125000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5024003us (24880.6 ops/sec) Did 37642 Ed25519 verify operations in 5072539us (7420.7 ops/sec) After: Did 206000 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5020547us (41031.4 ops/sec) Did 227000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5005232us (45352.5 ops/sec) Did 69840 Ed25519 verify operations in 5004769us (13954.7 ops/sec) Clang + OPENSSL_SMALL: Before: Did 68598 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024629us (13652.4 ops/sec) Did 73000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5067837us (14404.6 ops/sec) Did 36765 Ed25519 verify operations in 5078684us (7239.1 ops/sec) Did 74000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5016465us (14751.4 ops/sec) Did 45600 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5034680us (9057.2 ops/sec) After: Did 117315 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5021860us (23360.9 ops/sec) Did 126000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5003521us (25182.3 ops/sec) Did 64974 Ed25519 verify operations in 5047790us (12871.8 ops/sec) Did 134000 Curve25519 base-point multiplication operations in 5058946us (26487.7 ops/sec) Did 86000 Curve25519 arbitrary point multiplication operations in 5050478us (17028.1 ops/sec) GCC without OPENSSL_SMALL (ECDH omitted since that uses assembly and is unaffected by this CL). Before: Did 35552 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5030756us (7066.9 ops/sec) Did 38286 Ed25519 signing operations in 5001648us (7654.7 ops/sec) Did 10584 Ed25519 verify operations in 5068158us (2088.3 ops/sec) After: Did 92158 Ed25519 key generation operations in 5024021us (18343.5 ops/sec) Did 99000 Ed25519 signing operations in 5011908us (19753.0 ops/sec) Did 31122 Ed25519 verify operations in 5069878us (6138.6 ops/sec) Change-Id: Ic0c24d50b4ee2bbc408b94965e9d63319936107d Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24805 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2018-01-09 22:27:21 +00:00
buf.write(to_literal(term) + ",\n")
buf.write("},\n")
buf.write("""};
""")
proc = subprocess.Popen(["clang-format"], stdin=subprocess.PIPE)
proc.communicate(buf.getvalue())
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()