Bug: chromium:731280
Change-Id: I87161a3400ac5119401ec157df5843249971327a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17246
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Green <aarongreen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Free code coverage. Also rename things in SSL_select_next_proto so it
works for NPN and ALPN. (I found some code which uses it for ALPN.)
Change-Id: I8d06b768f9484dc3eda1a20506ec84ec3ddbc883
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17206
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ice03a4e8378da8ab94f1aa0545615c8aee6982d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17204
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=76
Change-Id: If58a73da38e46549fd55f84a9104e2dfebfda43f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14164
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This doesn't hugely matter, but I noticed it was some missing coverage.
Change-Id: I3e425d47fbbeaacd9da2ae883f34e89b4562ec11
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17184
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I8512c6bfb62f1a83afc8f763d681bf5db3b4ceae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17144
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This change allows blinding to be disabled without also having to remove
|e|, which would disable the CRT and the glitch checks. This is to
support disabling blinding in the FIPS power-on tests.
(Note: the case where |e| isn't set is tested by RSATest.OnlyDGiven.)
Change-Id: I28f18beda33b1687bf145f4cbdfd37ce262dd70f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17146
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Three modules were left behind in
I59df0b567e8e80befe5c399f817d6410ddafc577.
(Imported from upstream's c93f06c12f10c07cea935abd78a07a037e27f155.)
This actually meant functions defined in those two files were
non-functional. I'm guessing no one noticed upstream because, if you go
strictly by iOS compile-time capabilities, all this code is unreachable
on ios32, only ios64.
Change-Id: I55035edf2aebf96d14bdf66161afa2374643d4ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17113
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 413b6a82594ab45192dda233a77efe5637d656d6.)
This doesn't affect us but is imported to make future imports easier.
Change-Id: I8cc97d658df6cc25da69bff840b96a47e2946ddb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17112
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change was made by copying over the files as of that commit and
then discarding the parts of the diff which corresponding to our own
changes.
Change-Id: I28c5d711f7a8cec30749b8174687434129af5209
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17111
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Close difference gap on Cortex-A9, which resulted in further improvement
even on other processors.
(Imported from upstream's 8eed3289b21d25583ed44742db43a2d727b79643.)
Performance numbers on a Nexus 5X in AArch32 mode:
$ ./bssl.old speed -filter RSA -timeout 5
Did 355 RSA 2048 signing operations in 5009578us (70.9 ops/sec)
Did 20577 RSA 2048 verify operations in 5079000us (4051.4 ops/sec)
Did 66 RSA 4096 signing operations in 5057941us (13.0 ops/sec)
Did 5564 RSA 4096 verify operations in 5086902us (1093.8 ops/sec)
$ ./bssl speed -filter RSA -timeout 5
Did 411 RSA 2048 signing operations in 5010206us (82.0 ops/sec)
Did 27720 RSA 2048 verify operations in 5048114us (5491.2 ops/sec)
Did 86 RSA 4096 signing operations in 5056160us (17.0 ops/sec)
Did 8216 RSA 4096 verify operations in 5048719us (1627.3 ops/sec)
Change-Id: I8c5be9ff9405ec1796dcf4cfe7df8a89e5a50ce5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17109
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
As some of ARM processors, more specifically Cortex-Mx series, are
Thumb2-only, we need to support Thumb2-only builds even in assembly.
(Imported from upstream's 11208dcfb9105e8afa37233185decefd45e89e17.)
Change-Id: I7cb48ce6a842cf3cfdf553f6e6e6227d52d525c0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17108
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts commit 2cd63877b5. We've
since imported a change to upstream which adds some #defines that should
do the same thing on clang. (Though if gas accepts unified assembly too,
that does seem a better approach. Ah well. Diverging on these files is
expensive.)
This is to reduce the diff and make applying some subsequent changes
easier.
Change-Id: I3f5eae2a71919b291a8de9415b894d8f0c67e3cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17107
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 5e5ece561d1f7e557c8e0ea202a8c1f3008361ce.)
This doesn't matter but reduces the diff for changes past it.
Change-Id: Ib2e979eedad2a0b89c9d172207f6b7e610bf211f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17106
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We patch arm-xlate.pl to add the ifdefs, so this isn't needed and
reduces our upstream diff.
(We do still have a diff from upstream here. Will go through them
shortly.)
Change-Id: I5b1e301b9111969815f58d69a98591c973465f42
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17105
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This imports upstream's scrypt implementation, though it's been heavily
revised. I lost track of words vs. blocks vs. bigger blocks too many
times in the original code and introduced a typedef for the fixed-width
Salsa20 blocks. The downside is going from bytes to blocks is a bit
trickier, so I took advantage of our little-endian assumption.
This also adds an missing check for N < 2^32. Upstream's code is making
this assumption in Integerify. I'll send that change back upstream. I've
also removed the weird edge case where a NULL out_key parameter means to
validate N/r/p against max_mem and nothing else. That's just in there to
get a different error code out of their PKCS#12 code.
Performance-wise, the cleanup appears to be the same (up to what little
precision I was able to get here), but an optimization to use bitwise
AND rather than modulus makes us measurably faster. Though scrypt isn't
a fast operation to begin with, so hopefully it isn't anyone's
bottleneck.
This CL does not route scrypt up to the PKCS#12 code, though we could
write our own version of that if we need to later.
BUG=chromium:731993
Change-Id: Ib2f43344017ed37b6bafd85a2c2b103d695020b8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17084
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than adding a new mode to EVP_PKEY_CTX, upstream chose to tie
single-shot signing to EVP_MD_CTX, adding functions which combine
EVP_Digest*Update and EVP_Digest*Final. This adds a weird vestigial
EVP_MD_CTX and makes the signing digest parameter non-uniform, slightly
complicating things. But it means APIs like X509_sign_ctx can work
without modification.
Align with upstream's APIs. This required a bit of fiddling around
evp_test.cc. For consistency and to avoid baking details of parameter
input order, I made it eagerly read all inputs before calling
SetupContext. Otherwise which attributes are present depend a lot on the
shape of the API we use---notably the NO_DEFAULT_DIGEST tests for RSA
switch to failing before consuming an input, which is odd.
(This only matters because we have some tests which expect the operation
to abort the operation early with parameter errors and match against
Error. Those probably should not use FileTest to begin with, but I'll
tease that apart a later time.)
Upstream also named NID_Ed25519 as NID_ED25519, even though the
algorithm is normally stylized as "Ed25519". Switch it to match.
Change-Id: Id6c8f5715930038e754de50338924d044e908045
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17044
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
On POWER, r0 is wired to zero in some argument positions of some
instructions. The base register for a load is one of them. Thus, if
rewriting a load to r0, we cannot use r0 to store the base address.
This could be more efficient, but loading to r0 appears to be very rare
so I'm not going to worry about it for now.
Change-Id: I14dac96ba4c0380b166a7667b0cba918f1ae25ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17065
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These behave like EVP_AEAD_CTX_{seal,open} respectively, but receive
ciphertext and authentication tag as separate arguments, rather than one
contiguous out or in buffer.
Change-Id: Ia4f1b83424bc7067c55dd9e5a68f18061dab4d07
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16924
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These are never referenced within the library or externally. Some of the
constants have been unused since SSLeay.
Change-Id: I597511208dab1ab3816e5f730fcadaea9a733dff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17025
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/12360/ made us define
BORINGSSL_SHARED_LIBRARY when building tests via Bazel. The test has now
been moved to crypto_test, where the flags are more easily under the
control of the consumer.
Change-Id: If237efca219a1f03d64dc801cc1d585556bf2d1d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16987
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We've been compile-testing it for some time, and now we have a path (by
way of GTest and Chromium) to get them test coverage.
Change-Id: Ic33be8fce4bbef10cd586428e74972f230525792
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16990
Reviewed-by: Kári Helgason <kthelgason@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
None of these declarations are ever defined or constants used.
Change-Id: Id71ed5f02f9972d375845eacd9ce290a64b1c525
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17024
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Originally we had some confusion around whether the features could be
toggled individually or not. Per the ARM C Language Extensions doc[1],
__ARM_FEATURE_CRYPTO implies the "crypto extension" which encompasses
all of them. The runtime CPUID equivalent can report the features
individually, but it seems no one separates them in practice, for now.
(If they ever do, probably there'll be a new set of #defines.)
[1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0053c/IHI0053C_acle_2_0.pdf
Change-Id: I12915dfc308f58fb005286db75e50d8328eeb3ea
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16991
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These are, in turn, just taken from RFC 8032 and are all in
ed25519_tests.txt. But it's probably good to test non-empty inputs at
the EVP_PKEY layer too.
Change-Id: I21871a6efaad5c88b828d2e90d757c325a550b2a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16989
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This was specific to some old software on the test machine. Shrinking
the critical section to not cover getrandom is probably worthwhile
anyway though, so keep it around but make the comment less scary.
Change-Id: I8c17b6688ae93f6aef5d89c252900985d9e7bb52
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16992
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This matches the example code in IG 9.10.
Change-Id: Ie010d135d6c30acb9248b689302b0a27d65bc4f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17006
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Clang 4.0 on ppc64le generated symbols called “.LCE0” and so on.
Change-Id: I6bacf24365aa547d0ca9e5f338e4bb966df31708
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17005
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This is a fairly shallow conversion because of the somewhat screwy Error
lines in the test which may target random functions like
EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_signature_md. We probably should revise this, perhaps
moving those to normal tests and leaving error codes to the core
operation itself.
BUG=129
Change-Id: I27dcc945058911b2de40cd48466d4e0366813a12
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16988
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Icb3003d71e3d61eb98fb8835bd567e383f22affc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17004
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is less likely to make the compiler grumpy and generates the same
code. (Although this file has worse casts here which I'm still trying to
get the compiler to cooperate on.)
Change-Id: If7ac04c899d2cba2df34eac51d932a82d0c502d9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16986
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We lost some parallelism by putting the tests into one binary and have
enough giant test vector files now that this takes some time. Shard them
back up again.
BUG=129
Change-Id: I1d196bd8c4851bf975d6b4f2f0403ae65feac884
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16984
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
POWER8 has hardware transactional memory, which glibc uses to implement
locks. In some cases, taking a lock begins a transaction, wrapping
arbitrary user code (!) until the lock is released. If the transaction
is aborted, everything rewinds and glibc tries again with some other
implementation.
The kernel will abort the transaction in a variety of cases. Notably, on
a syscall, the transaction aborts and the syscall *does not happen*.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/powerpc/transactional_memory.txt
Yet, for some reason, although the relevant change does appear to be in
the kernel, the transaction is being rewound with getrandom happening
anyway. This does not work very well.
Instead, only guard the DRBG access with the lock, not CRYPTO_sysrand.
This lock is only used to protect the DRBG from the destructor that
zeros everything.
Change-Id: Ied8350f1e808a09300651de4200c7b0d07b3a158
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16985
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: Ia8b0639489fea817be4bb24f0457629f0fd6a815
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16947
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I4e0da85857e820f8151e2fb50d699f14fedee97b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16966
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I2e7b9e80419758a5ee4f53915f13334bbf8e0447
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16965
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ic22ea72b0134aa7884f1e75433dd5c18247f57ab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16964
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The crypto target depends on having access to the fips_fragments when
compiling bcm.c. Explicitly load and add them as a dependency of that
target.
Change-Id: Ibe6f589cc63b653c52eb2c32b445ec31996b6247
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16946
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
