Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Benjamin
fdd8e9c8c7 Switch perlasm calling convention.
Depending on architecture, perlasm differed on which one or both of:

  perl foo.pl flavor output.S
  perl foo.pl flavor > output.S

Upstream has now unified on the first form after making a number of
changes to their files (the second does not even work for their x86
files anymore). Sync those portions of our perlasm scripts with upstream
and update CMakeLists.txt and generate_build_files.py per the new
convention.

This imports various commits like this one:
184bc45f683c76531d7e065b6553ca9086564576 (this was done by taking a
diff, so I don't have the full list)

Confirmed that generate_build_files.py sees no change.

BUG=14

Change-Id: Id2fb5b8bc2a7369d077221b5df9a6947d41f50d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8518
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-06-27 21:59:26 +00:00
David Benjamin
09bdb2a2c3 Remove explicit .hiddens from x86_64 perlasm files.
This reverts the non-ARM portions of 97999919bb.
x86_64 perlasm already makes .globl imply .hidden. (Confusingly, ARM does not.)
Since we don't need it, revert those to minimize divergence with upstream.

Change-Id: I2d205cfb1183e65d4f18a62bde187d206b1a96de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3610
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2015-02-25 21:26:16 +00:00
Adam Langley
97999919bb Hide all asm symbols.
We are leaking asm symbols in Android builds because the asm code isn't
affected by -fvisibility=hidden. This change hides all asm symbols.

This assumes that no asm symbols are public API and that should be true.
Some points to note:

In crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-md5-x86_64.pl there are |RC4_set_key| and
|RC4_options| functions which aren't getting marked as hidden. That's
because those functions aren't actually ever generated. (I'm just trying
to minimise drift with upstream here.)

In crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl there's |RC4_options| which is "public"
API, except that we've never had it in the header files. So I've just
deleted it. Since we have an internal caller, we'll probably have to put
it back in the future, but it can just be done in rc4.c to save
problems.

BUG=448386

Change-Id: I3846617a0e3d73ec9e5ec3638a53364adbbc6260
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3520
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2015-02-20 21:24:01 +00:00
Adam Langley
3dfbcc1f25 x86[_64] assembly pack: add Silvermont performance data.
(Imported from upstream's 9dd6240201fdd9a9a0ce2aa66df04c174d08cf99)

Change-Id: Ie0f6f876e06ac28c717ec949565f6b0126166b30
2014-11-10 13:45:32 -08:00
Adam Langley
89b73fbafa aes/asm/bsaes-x86_64.pl: Atom-specific optimization.
(Imported from upstream's ffdff9f12f028e4075b473a2a21e51c5bcc2bbd9)
2014-06-20 13:17:40 -07:00
Adam Langley
95c29f3cd1 Inital import.
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).

(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
2014-06-20 13:17:32 -07:00