Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Benjamin
6757fbf8e3 Convert a number of tests to GTest.
BUG=129

Change-Id: Ifcdacb2f5f59fd03b757f88778ceb1e672208fd9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16744
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2017-06-01 17:02:13 +00:00
Adam Langley
d79bc9d397 Echo CAVP comments in the output.
Comments in CAVP are semantically important and we need to copy them
from the input to the output.

Change-Id: Ib798c4ad79de924487d0c4a0f8fc16b757e766d8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16725
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2017-05-30 23:02:14 +00:00
David Benjamin
3ecd0a5fca Convert aes_test to GTest.
This introduces machinery to start embedding the test data files into
the crypto_test binary. Figuring out every CI's test data story is more
trouble than is worth it. The GTest FileTest runner is considerably
different from the old one:

- It returns void and expects failures to use the GTest EXPECT_* and
  ASSERT_* macros, rather than ExpectBytesEqual. This is more monkey
  work to convert, but ultimately less work to add new tests. I think
  it's also valuable for our FileTest and normal test patterns to align
  as much as possible. The line number is emitted via SCOPED_TRACE.

- I've intentionally omitted the Error attribute handling, since that
  doesn't work very well with the new callback. This means evp_test.cc
  will take a little more work to convert, but this is again to keep our
  two test patterns aligned.

- The callback takes a std::function rather than a C-style void pointer.
  This means we can go nuts with lambdas. It also places the path first
  so clang-format doesn't go nuts.

BUG=129

Change-Id: I0d1920a342b00e64043e3ea05f5f5af57bfe77b3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16507
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2017-05-23 22:33:25 +00:00