Only ECDHE-based ciphers are implemented. To ease the transition, the
pre-standard cipher shares a name with the standard one. The cipher rule parser
is hacked up to match the name to both ciphers. From the perspective of the
cipher suite configuration language, there is only one cipher.
This does mean it is impossible to disable the old variant without a code
change, but this situation will be very short-lived, so this is fine.
Also take this opportunity to make the CK and TXT names align with convention.
Change-Id: Ie819819c55bce8ff58e533f1dbc8bef5af955c21
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6686
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
clang-format packing them tightly made newlines inconsistent which
wasn't very helpful.
Change-Id: I46a787862ed1f5b0eee101394e24c779b6bc652b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6517
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Trim the cipher table further. Those values are entirely determined by
algorithm_enc.
Change-Id: I355c245b0663e41e54e62d15903a4a9a667b4ffe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6516
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
FIPS is the same as HIGH (but for CHACHA20), so those are redundant.
Likewise, MEDIUM vs HIGH was just RC4. Remove those in favor of
redefining those legacy rules to mean this.
One less field to keep track of in each cipher.
Change-Id: I2b2489cffb9e16efb0ac7d7290c173cac061432a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6515
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's redundant with other cipher properties. We can express these in code.
Cipher rule matching gets a little bit complicated due to the confusing legacy
protocol version cipher rules, so add some tests for it. (It's really hard to
grep for uses of them, so I've kept them working to be safe.)
Change-Id: Ic6b3fcd55d76d4a51b31bf7ae629a2da50a7450e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6453
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I3072f884be77b8646e90d316154b96448f0cf2a1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6520
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's a few things that will be kind of a nuisance and possibly not worth it
(crypto/asn1 dumps a lot of undeclared things, etc.). But it caught some
mistakes. Even without the warning, making sure to include the externs before
defining a function helps catch type mismatches.
Change-Id: I3dab282aaba6023e7cebc94ed7a767a5d7446b08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6484
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts most of commit 271777f5ac. The old
ChaCha20-Poly1305, though being transitioned to the old name, should not change
in behavior. This also avoids adding a special-case to SSL_AEAD_CTX.
Also revert the name change to SSL_CIPHER_is_CHACHA20POLY1305. The one consumer
for that function doesn't need to distinguish the old and new variants, so
avoid unnecessary turbulence.
Change-Id: I5a6f97fccc5839d4d25e74e304dc002329d21b4b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6385
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change reduces unnecessary copying and makes the pre-RFC-7539
nonces 96 bits just like the AES-GCM, AES-CCM, and RFC 7539
ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher suites. Also, all the symbols related to
the pre-RFC-7539 cipher suites now have "_OLD" appended, in
preparation for adding the RFC 7539 variants.
Change-Id: I1f85bd825b383c3134df0b6214266069ded029ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6103
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
They're really not all that helpful, considering they're each used
exactly once. They're also confusing as it is ALMOST the case that
SSL_TXT_FOO expands to "FOO", but SSL_TXT_AES_GCM expand "AESGCM" and
the protocol versions have lowercase v's and dots.
Change-Id: If78ad8edb0c024819219f61675c60c2a7f3a36b0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6307
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
The Android system BoringSSL has a couple of changes:
∙ ChaCha20-Poly1305 is disabled because it's not an offical
cipher suite.
∙ P-521 is offered in the ClientHello.
These changes were carried in the Android BoringSSL repo directly. This
change upstreams them when BORINGSSL_ANDROID_SYSTEM is defined.
Change-Id: If3e787c6694655b56e7701118aca661e97a5f26c
RSA_PSK is really weird in that it takes a Certificate, but you're not
expected to verify it. It's just a funny way to transmit an RSA key.
(They probably should have used the RSA_EXPORT ServerKeyExchange
spelling.) Some code now already doesn't account for it right around
certificate verification.
Given ECDHE_PSK exists, hopefully there will never be any need to add
this.
Change-Id: Ia64dac28099eaa9021f8d915d45ccbfd62872317
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5941
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We wish to be able to detect the use of RC4 so that we can flag it and
investigate before it's disabled.
Change-Id: I6dc3a5d2211b281097531a43fadf08edb5a09646
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5930
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ssl.h should be first. Also two lines after includes and the rest of the
file.
Change-Id: Icb7586e00a3e64170082c96cf3f8bfbb2b7e1611
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5892
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It was checking algorithm_mac rather than algorithm_enc.
(Coincidentally, it gave the right answer if you compiled out the
ChaCha20 ciphers since SSL_AES128GCM and SSL_AEAD shared a value.)
Change-Id: I17047425ef7fabb98969144965d8db9528ef8497
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5850
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This begins decoupling the transport from the SSL state machine. The buffering
logic is hidden behind an opaque API. Fields like ssl->packet and
ssl->packet_length are gone.
ssl3_get_record and dtls1_get_record now call low-level tls_open_record and
dtls_open_record functions that unpack a single record independent of who owns
the buffer. Both may be called in-place. This removes ssl->rstate which was
redundant with the buffer length.
Future work will push the buffer up the stack until it is above the handshake.
Then we can expose SSL_open and SSL_seal APIs which act like *_open_record but
return a slightly larger enum due to other events being possible. Likewise the
handshake state machine will be detached from its buffer. The existing
SSL_read, SSL_write, etc., APIs will be implemented on top of SSL_open, etc.,
combined with ssl_read_buffer_* and ssl_write_buffer_*. (Which is why
ssl_read_buffer_extend still tries to abstract between TLS's and DTLS's fairly
different needs.)
The new buffering logic does not support read-ahead (removed previously) since
it lacks a memmove on ssl_read_buffer_discard for TLS, but this could be added
if desired. The old buffering logic wasn't quite right anyway; it tried to
avoid the memmove in some cases and could get stuck too far into the buffer and
not accept records. (The only time the memmove is optional is in DTLS or if
enough of the record header is available to know that the entire next record
would fit in the buffer.)
The new logic also now actually decrypts the ciphertext in-place again, rather
than almost in-place when there's an explicit nonce/IV. (That accidentally
switched in https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/#/c/4792/; see
3d59e04bce96474099ba76786a2337e99ae14505.)
BUG=468889
Change-Id: I403c1626253c46897f47c7ae93aeab1064b767b2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5715
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Apparently we left those as zero. Oh well. This only affects
SSL_CIPHER_get_bits, but so long as we have the field, it ought to be correct.
Change-Id: I2878ec22c2f5a6263f805e04d9fd8448994639b7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5752
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This made sense when the cipher might have been standardized as-is, so a
DHE_RSA variant could appease the IETF. Since the standardized variant is going
to have some nonce tweaks anyway, there's no sense in keeping this around. Get
rid of one non-standard cipher suite value early. (Even if they were to be
standardized as-is, it's not clear we should implement new DHE cipher suites at
this point.)
Chrome UMA, unsurprisingly, shows that it's unused.
Change-Id: Id83d73a4294b470ec2e94d5308fba135d6eeb228
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5750
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than support arbitrarily many handshake hashes in the general
case (which the PRF logic assumes is capped at two), special-case the
MD5/SHA1 two-hash combination and otherwise maintain a single rolling
hash.
Change-Id: Ide9475565b158f6839bb10b8b22f324f89399f92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5618
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's purely the PRF function now, although it's still different from the
rest due to the _DEFAULT field being weird.
Change-Id: Iaea7a99cccdc8be4cd60f6c1503df5be2a63c4c5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5614
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's a property of just algorithm_enc and hopefully AES-GCM will
continue to be the only true AEAD that requires this. Simpler to just
keep it in ssl_aead_ctx.c.
Change-Id: Ib7c060a3de2fa8590b2dc36c23a5d5fabff43b07
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5613
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This allows us to remove the confusing EVP_PKEY argument to the
SSL_PRIVATE_KEY_METHOD wrapper functions. It also simplifies some of the
book-keeping around the CERT structure, as well as the API for
configuring certificates themselves. The current one is a little odd as
some functions automatically route to the slot while others affect the
most recently touched slot. Others still (extra_certs) apply to all
slots, making them not terribly useful.
Consumers with complex needs should use cert_cb or the early callback
(select_certificate_cb) to configure whatever they like based on the
ClientHello.
BUG=486295
Change-Id: Ice29ffeb867fa4959898b70dfc50fc00137f01f3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5351
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The distinction was not well-enforced in the code. In fact, it wasn't
even possible to use the RSA_SIGN slot because ssl_set_pkey and
ssl_set_cert would always use the RSA_ENC slot.
A follow-up will fold away the mechanism altogether, but this is an easy
initial simplfication.
BUG=486295
Change-Id: I66b5bf3e6dc243dac7c75924c1c1983538e49060
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5349
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If we're going to have PSK and use standard cipher suites, this might be
the best that we can do for the moment.
Change-Id: I35d9831b2991dc5b23c9e24d98cdc0db95919d39
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5052
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is the best PSK cipher suite, but it's non-standard and nobody is
using it. Trivial to bring back in the future if we have need of it.
Change-Id: Ie78790f102027c67d1c9b19994bfb10a2095ba92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5051
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
With SSL2 gone, there's no need for this split between the abstract
cipher framework and ciphers. Put the cipher suite table in ssl_cipher.c
and move other SSL_CIPHER logic there. With that gone, prune the
cipher-related hooks in SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD.
BUG=468889
Change-Id: I48579de8bc4c0ea52781ba1b7b57bc5b4919d21c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4961
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They're redundant with each other.
Change-Id: I17e7ff8c4e0b1486986dd866fd99673fa2aaa494
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4959
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Just about everything depends on SSL_CIPHER. Move it to the top as the first
section in ssl.h. Match the header order and the source file order and document
everything. Also make a couple of minor style guide tweaks.
Change-Id: I6a810dbe79238278ac480e5ced1447055715a79f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4290
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
