Bazel sees BUILD files are markers for different packages. So by having
a file named “BUILD” in the source tree, Bazel thinks that there are
several packages involved.
This change renames it to BUILD.toplevel to avoid this.
Change-Id: Ia76167334cd52f72ff25ecb08533c30e5e423ab8
This reverts commits:
8d79ed674019fdcb52348d79ed6740
Because WebRTC (at least) includes our headers in an extern "C" block,
which precludes having any C++ in them.
Change-Id: Ia849f43795a40034cbd45b22ea680b51aab28b2d
MSVC doesn't define __cplusplus as 201103 to indicate C++11 support, so
just assume that the compiler supports C++11 if _MSC_VER is defined.
Change-Id: I27f6eeefe6e8dc522470f36fab76ab36d85eebac
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8734
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Now that we have template code in them, that doesn't work.
Change-Id: I9ead5d202b0d8c9b848cf25a1f247f824394a168
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8733
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Last month's canary for loop did not die in the coal mine of decrepit
toolchains. Make a note of this in STYLE.md so we know to start breeding
more of them. We can indeed declare index variables like it's 1999.
I haven't bothered to convert all of our for loops because that will be
tedious, but we can do it as we touch the code. Or if someone feels
really really bored.
BUG=47
Change-Id: Ib76c0767c1b509e825eac66f8c2e3ee2134e2493
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8740
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
For when the PackHandshakeFlight tests get enabled.
Change-Id: Iee20fd27d88ed58f59af3b7e2dd92235d35af9ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8663
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This change scatters the contents of the two scoped_types.h files into
the headers for each of the areas of the code. The types are now in the
|bssl| namespace.
Change-Id: I802b8de68fba4786b6a0ac1bacd11d81d5842423
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We currently have the situation where the |tool| and |bssl_shim| code
includes scoped_types.h from crypto/test and ssl/test. That's weird and
shouldn't happen. Also, our C++ consumers might quite like to have
access to the scoped types.
Thus this change moves some of the template code to base.h and puts it
all in a |bssl| namespace to prepare for scattering these types into
their respective headers. In order that all the existing test code be
able to access these types, it's all moved into the same namespace.
Change-Id: I3207e29474dc5fcc344ace43119df26dae04eabb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
It still places the current message all over the place, but remove the
bizarre init_num/error/ok split. Now callers get the message length out
of init_num, which mirrors init_msg. Also fix some signedness.
Change-Id: Ic2e97b6b99e234926504ff217b8aedae85ba6596
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8690
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This machinery is so different between TLS and DTLS that there is no
sense in having them share structures. This switches us to maintaining
the full reassembled message in hm_fragment and get_message just lets
the caller read out of that when ready.
This removes the last direct handshake dependency on init_buf,
ssl3_hash_message.
Change-Id: I4eccfb6e6021116255daead5359a0aa3f4d5be7b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8667
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Since they include an ECDHE exchange in them, they are equally-well
suited to False Start.
Change-Id: I75d31493a614a78ccbf337574c359271831d654d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8732
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We usually put main at the end. There's now nothing interesting in the
function, so avoid having to declare every test at the top.
Change-Id: Iac469f41f0fb7d1f58d12dfbf651bf0d39f073d0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8712
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
That removes the last of the bc stuff.
BUG=31
Change-Id: If64c974b75c36daf14c46f07b0d9355b7cd0adcb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8711
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
../tool/transport_common.cc:429:14: error: ‘code_250’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
(I don't believe it can actually happen though.)
Change-Id: I78d19ad42ed4c05404f1d8d3e8f254ede3244b8d
This change adds support for doing an SMTP STARTTLS dance before a TLS
handshake when using the tool. This is useful for poking at SMTP
servers.
Change-Id: I04cd60d02d3377cce83e412d62e3257235a19116
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8662
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Since Bazel doesn't have a shared vs static concept that's exposed to
the build rules (as far as I know) symbol visibility would mean that the
symbols might be exposed when building a larger library. That could be
fixed with a linker script, but this change appears to be slightly more
useful for our consumers.
(Also, if we're going to set -fvisibility=hidden, we should also have set
the defines needed to include the visibility annotations.)
Change-Id: Ic7d64a553da48cfb9cf5460d26254de7e105fd65
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8664
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium no longer uses it.
Change-Id: I50cc55bad4124305686d299032a2e8ed2cb9d0d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8691
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Both DTLS and TLS still use it, but that will change in the following
commit. This also removes the handshake's knowledge of the
dtls_clear_incoming_messages function.
(It's possible we'll want to get rid of begin_handshake in favor of
allocating it lazily depending on how TLS 1.3 post-handshake messages
end up working out. But this should work for now.)
Change-Id: I0f512788bbc330ab2c947890939c73e0a1aca18b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8666
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These are where the DTLS- and TLS-specific transport layer hooks will be
defined. Later we can probably move much of the implementations of these
hooks into these files so those functions can be static.
While I'm here, fix up the naming of some constants.
Change-Id: I1009dd9fdc3cc4fd49fbff0802f6289931abec3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8665
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper, revised by davidben.]
When we add this in the real code, this will want ample tests and hooks
for bugs, but get the core logic in to start with.
Change-Id: I86cf0b6416c9077dbb6471a1802ae984b8fa6c72
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8598
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
V2ClientHello is going to be ugly wherever we do it, but this hides it
behind the transport method table. It removes a place where the
handshake state machine reaches into ssl3_get_message's internal state.
ssl3_get_message will now silently translate V2ClientHellos into true
ClientHellos and manage the handshake hash appropriately.
Now the only accesses of init_buf from the handshake state machines are
to create and destroy the buffer.
Change-Id: I81467a038f6ac472a465eec7486a443fe50a98e1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8641
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
TLS 1.3 will use a different function from processClientHello.
Change-Id: I8b26a601cf553834b508feab051927d5986091ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8597
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
As with the client, the logic around extensions in 1.3 will want to be
tweaked. readClientHello will probably shrink a bit. (We could probably
stuff 1.3 into the existing parameter negotiation logic, but I expect
it'll get a bit unwieldy once HelloRetryRequest, PSK resumption, and
0-RTT get in there, so I think it's best we leave them separate.)
Change-Id: Id8c323a06a1def6857a59accd9f87fb0b088385a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8596
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
While the random connection property extensions like ALPN and SRTP
remain largely unchanged in TLS 1.3 (but for interaction with 0-RTT),
authentication-related extensions change significantly and need
dedicated logic.
Change-Id: I2588935c2563a22e9879fb81478b8df5168b43de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8602
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Test with and without PackHandshakeFlight enabled to cover when the
early post-CCS fragment will get packed into one of the pre-CCS
handshake records. Also test the resumption cases too to cover more
state transitions.
The various CCS-related tests (since CCS is kind of a mess) are pulled
into their own group.
Change-Id: I6384f2fb28d9885cd2b06d59e765e080e3822d8a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8661
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper and then revised by davidben.]
Most features are missing, but it works for a start. To avoid breaking
the fake TLS 1.3 tests while the C code is still not landed, all the
logic is gated on a global boolean. When the C code gets in, we'll
set it to true and remove this boolean.
Change-Id: I6b3a369890864c26203fc9cda37c8250024ce91b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8601
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I'm surprised we'd never tested this. In addition to splitting handshake
records up, one may pack multiple handshakes into a single record, as
they fit. Generalize the DTLS handshake flush hook to do this in TLS as
well.
Change-Id: Ia546d18c7c56ba45e50f489c5b53e1fcd6404f51
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8650
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.2 and 1.3 will process more-or-less the same server extensions,
but at slightly different points in the handshake. In preparation for
that, split this out into its own function.
Change-Id: I5494dee4724295794dfd13c5e9f9f83eade6b20a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8586
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper, tweaked by davidben.]
For now, ignore them completely.
Change-Id: I28602f219d210a857aa80d6e735557b8d2d1c590
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8585
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than have a separate codepath, just skip the message_complete
logic and parse what's in the buffer. This also cuts down on one input
to setting up a reuse_message; message_type is now only written to in
the get_message implementation.
Change-Id: I96689b5957a3f2548af9099ec4e53cabacdc395a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8640
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We now have a branch that contains the source code in a form suitable
for using with Bazel. This can be easier for projects that are already
using Bazel to deal with.
Change-Id: Iaaddb2ee50b367114ff2de88a526bf4bdb6ad7ab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8651
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Also move them with the other version negotiation tests.
Change-Id: I8ea5777c131f8ab618de3c6d02038e802bd34dd0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8550
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Amazingly, this function actually has (not crypto-related) callers, despite
being pretty much useless for cryptography.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I440827380995695c7a15bbf2220a05ffb28d9335
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8594
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These were generated by running test_mod_exp_mont5 10 times. The values with
Montgomery representation 1 were generated separately so the test file could
preserve the comment. (Though, at 10,000 lines, no one's going to find it...)
BUG=31
Change-Id: I8e9d4d6d7b5f7d283bd259df10a1dbdc90b888cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8611
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Honestly, with this size of number, they're pretty bad test vectors.
test_mod_exp_mont5 will be imported in the next commit which should help.
This was done by taking test_mod_exp's generation, running it a few times
(since otherwise the modulus is always the same). I also ran it a few times
with the odd constraint removed since BN_mod_exp is supposed to support it,
even if it's not actually useful.
BUG=31
Change-Id: Id53953f0544123a5ea71efac534946055dd5aabc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8610
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
That one needs reduced inputs and the other ought to be also tested against
unreduced ones is a bit annoying. But the previous commit made sure BN_nnmod
has tests, and test_mont could stand to inherit test_mod_mul's test data (it
only had five tests originally!), so I merged them.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I1eb585b14f85f0ea01ee81537a01e07ced9f5d9a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8608
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
In preparation for converting test_mont and test_mod_mul to test vectors, make
test_mont less silly. We can certainly get away with doing more than five
tests. Also generate |a| and |b| anew each time. Otherwise the first BN_nmod is
destructive.
Change-Id: I944007ed7b6013a16d972cb7290ab9992c9360ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8605
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
