Change-Id: I7922b4b26dabb6875e800472ee8453ca4a9922e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/32845
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

These are re-recorded with the new fuzzer format.

Bug: 104
Change-Id: I00798f8f2026ae4570ffdcdae4a47999fd277212
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17535
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

This was done by prepending each file with kDataTag, or 0x0000. This
causes them to behave as they did before the fuzzer updates.

Bug: 104
Change-Id: Ic768606911e1310fb59bed647990c237fe15776b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17534
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

Fuzzer mode explores the handshake, but at the cost of losing coverage
on the record layer. Add a separate build flag and client/server
corpora for this mode.

Note this requires tweaks in consumers' fuzzer build definitions.

BUG=111

Change-Id: I1026dc7301645e165a761068a1daad6eedc9271e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12108
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This was done by first minimizing the existing set and then merging in a
fresh recording from runner. Glancing through LCOV output does not
reveal anything anomolous. Fuzzer mode seems to be working as expected.

Change-Id: Ife0959a5e16e3c7e2e5a2deb0c32539ff2bc740b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11229
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Corpus recorded from runner and merged into existing corpus with
libFuzzer's -merge flag.

BUG=79

Change-Id: I986a50976ffef141b63e31de3a81fdb4ed5c1348
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11130
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>