Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Benjamin
f8058d4114 Add M=8 L=2 AES-128-CCM as well.
The Bluetooth Mesh spec uses both apparently. Also extract a pile of
test vectors from that document (thanks to Kyle Lund for showing me
which to extract).

Change-Id: I04a04fafb7386ca28adfe1446fa388e841778931
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/26324
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2018-03-02 18:45:06 +00:00
Steven Valdez
f16cd4278f Add AES_128_CCM AEAD.
Change-Id: I830be64209deada0f24c3b6d50dc86155085c377
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25904
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2018-02-16 15:57:27 +00:00
David Benjamin
4015000e19 Add a test for lots of names and constraints.
Change-Id: I0ad593cb5c73d61391aa7513054e5cf102334817
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20524
Reviewed-by: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
2017-09-20 19:58:48 +00:00
David Benjamin
b529253bea Implement scrypt from RFC 7914.
This imports upstream's scrypt implementation, though it's been heavily
revised. I lost track of words vs. blocks vs. bigger blocks too many
times in the original code and introduced a typedef for the fixed-width
Salsa20 blocks. The downside is going from bytes to blocks is a bit
trickier, so I took advantage of our little-endian assumption.

This also adds an missing check for N < 2^32. Upstream's code is making
this assumption in Integerify. I'll send that change back upstream. I've
also removed the weird edge case where a NULL out_key parameter means to
validate N/r/p against max_mem and nothing else. That's just in there to
get a different error code out of their PKCS#12 code.

Performance-wise, the cleanup appears to be the same (up to what little
precision I was able to get here), but an optimization to use bitwise
AND rather than modulus makes us measurably faster. Though scrypt isn't
a fast operation to begin with, so hopefully it isn't anyone's
bottleneck.

This CL does not route scrypt up to the PKCS#12 code, though we could
write our own version of that if we need to later.

BUG=chromium:731993

Change-Id: Ib2f43344017ed37b6bafd85a2c2b103d695020b8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17084
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2017-06-12 20:32:21 +00:00
David Benjamin
656aa9a262 Convert p256-x86_64_test to GTest.
BUG=129

Change-Id: Ieda2c2cc08f83ae24a2dfdb243dc17b4c15ed5b2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16993
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2017-06-09 18:50:56 +00:00
David Benjamin
16c3f06eb0 Convert evp_test to GTest.
This is a fairly shallow conversion because of the somewhat screwy Error
lines in the test which may target random functions like
EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_signature_md. We probably should revise this, perhaps
moving those to normal tests and leaving error codes to the core
operation itself.

BUG=129

Change-Id: I27dcc945058911b2de40cd48466d4e0366813a12
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16988
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2017-06-08 20:28:12 +00:00
David Benjamin
d91e1efd83 Convert ECDSA tests to GTest.
BUG=129

Change-Id: Ia8b0639489fea817be4bb24f0457629f0fd6a815
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16947
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2017-06-07 19:22:23 +00:00
David Benjamin
6758d043bb Convert bn_test to GTest.
BUG=129

Change-Id: I21570257c2f40a2c65587d30dbf249a546aa7d8e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16885
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2017-06-05 21:45:07 +00:00
David Benjamin
6757fbf8e3 Convert a number of tests to GTest.
BUG=129

Change-Id: Ifcdacb2f5f59fd03b757f88778ceb1e672208fd9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16744
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
2017-06-01 17:02:13 +00:00
David Benjamin
8c2e8282ab Convert ed25519_test to GTest.
BUG=129

Change-Id: I784a745f102d9d09d35b27542d94b2b85dfb332e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16508
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2017-05-23 22:33:55 +00:00
David Benjamin
3ecd0a5fca Convert aes_test to GTest.
This introduces machinery to start embedding the test data files into
the crypto_test binary. Figuring out every CI's test data story is more
trouble than is worth it. The GTest FileTest runner is considerably
different from the old one:

- It returns void and expects failures to use the GTest EXPECT_* and
  ASSERT_* macros, rather than ExpectBytesEqual. This is more monkey
  work to convert, but ultimately less work to add new tests. I think
  it's also valuable for our FileTest and normal test patterns to align
  as much as possible. The line number is emitted via SCOPED_TRACE.

- I've intentionally omitted the Error attribute handling, since that
  doesn't work very well with the new callback. This means evp_test.cc
  will take a little more work to convert, but this is again to keep our
  two test patterns aligned.

- The callback takes a std::function rather than a C-style void pointer.
  This means we can go nuts with lambdas. It also places the path first
  so clang-format doesn't go nuts.

BUG=129

Change-Id: I0d1920a342b00e64043e3ea05f5f5af57bfe77b3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16507
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2017-05-23 22:33:25 +00:00