|SSL_SESSION_from_bytes| now takes an |SSL_CTX*|, from which it uses the
|X509_METHOD| and buffer pool. This is our API so we can do this.
This also requires adding an |SSL_CTX*| argument to |SSL_SESSION_new|
for the same reason. However, |SSL_SESSION_new| already has very few
callers (and none in third-party code that I can see) so I think we can
get away with this.
Change-Id: I1337cd2bd8cff03d4b9405ea3146b3b59584aa72
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13584
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Also tidy up the logic slightly.
Change-Id: I708254406b2df52435ec434ac9806e8eb2cbe928
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11322
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There was only one function that required BoringSSL to know how to read
directories. Unfortunately, it does have some callers and it's not immediately
obvious whether the code is unreachable. Rather than worry about that, just
toss it all into decrepit.
In doing so, do away with the Windows and PNaCl codepaths. Only implement
OPENSSL_DIR_CTX on Linux.
Change-Id: Ie64d20254f2f632fadc3f248bbf5a8293ab2b451
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7661
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There was only one function that required BoringSSL to know how to read
directories. Unfortunately, it does have some callers and it's not immediately
obvious whether the code is unreachable. Rather than worry about that, just
toss it all into decrepit.
In doing so, do away with the Windows and PNaCl codepaths. Only implement
OPENSSL_DIR_CTX on Linux.
Change-Id: I3eb55b098e3aa042b422bb7da115c0812685553e
Or at least group them together and make a passing attempt to document
them. The legacy X.509 stack itself remains largely untouched and most
of the parameters have to do with it.
Change-Id: I9e11e2ad1bbeef53478c787344398c0d8d1b3876
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5942
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Quite a lot of consumers of the SSL stack will never need to touch files from
the SSL stack, but enough do that we can't just ditch them. Toss that all into
their own file so a static linker can drop it.
Change-Id: Ia07de939889eb09e3ab16aebcc1b6869ca8b75a0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5820
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
