Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Benjamin
17cf2cb1d2 Work around language and compiler bug in memcpy, etc.
Most C standard library functions are undefined if passed NULL, even
when the corresponding length is zero. This gives them (and, in turn,
all functions which call them) surprising behavior on empty arrays.
Some compilers will miscompile code due to this rule. See also
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html

Add OPENSSL_memcpy, etc., wrappers which avoid this problem.

BUG=23

Change-Id: I95f42b23e92945af0e681264fffaf578e7f8465e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12928
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-12-21 20:34:47 +00:00
David Benjamin
ec978dd812 Add corpora for fuzzers with fuzzer mode disabled.
Fuzzer mode explores the handshake, but at the cost of losing coverage
on the record layer. Add a separate build flag and client/server
corpora for this mode.

Note this requires tweaks in consumers' fuzzer build definitions.

BUG=111

Change-Id: I1026dc7301645e165a761068a1daad6eedc9271e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12108
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-11-09 16:53:37 +00:00
Alessandro Ghedini
0d099f0f1b Define RAND_cleanup in one place only
Change-Id: I439e275394c2ad686924f4e7dfc99cfdc7bb14b9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8682
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-07-11 17:02:45 +00:00
David Benjamin
bc5b2a2e22 Add a deterministic PRNG for fuzzing.
If running the stack through a fuzzer, we would like execution to be
completely deterministic. This is gated on a
BORINGSSL_UNSAFE_FUZZER_MODE #ifdef.

For now, this just uses the zero ChaCha20 key and a global counter. As
needed, we can extend this to a thread-local counter and a separate
ChaCha20 stream and counter per input length.

Change-Id: Ic6c9d8a25e70d68e5dc6804e2c234faf48e51395
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7286
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-03-03 01:36:19 +00:00