I misunderstood the OpenSSL semantics here. When receiving an error data
pointer via ERR_get_error_line_data and friends, although the error is
cleared, OpenSSL retains ownership of the data pointer. It's kept in the
cleared error until another error overrides it, or the whole error queue
is cleared.
It's pretty odd to have live pointers in empty errors so this change
allows an error queue to retain one data pointer. Thus the pointer
returned from ERR_get_error_line_data is valid until the next call to
ERR_get_error_line_data, or until the queue is freed.
From reviewing uses of the API, this is sufficient for all of them.
Change-Id: I73cb8e9c792452ae3c1a934ac8bbe8b5353b65b2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1880
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium does not like static initializers, and the CPU logic uses one to
initialize CPU bits. However, the crypto library lacks an explicit
initialization function, which could complicate (no compile-time errors)
porting existing code which uses crypto/, but not ssl/.
Add an explicit CRYPTO_library_init function, but make it a no-op by default.
It only does anything (and is required) if building with
BORINGSSL_NO_STATIC_INITIALIZER.
Change-Id: I6933bdc3447fb382b1f87c788e5b8142d6f3fe39
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1770
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is cleaner than the OpenSSL code was, at least, but it's hardly
beautiful due to the "standard" that it's trying to implement. (See
[1].)
The references from the PKCS#8 code to various ciphers have digests have
been made into function pointer references rather than NIDs so that the
linker will be able to drop RC2 code for binaries that don't call PKCS#8
or #12 functions.
A bug that crashed OpenSSL/BoringSSL when parsing a malformed PKCS#8
structure has been fixed too.
See https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/pfx.html
Change-Id: Iaa1039e04ed7877b90792835e8ce3ebc3b29f89e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1592
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Otherwise, in C, it becomes a K&R function declaration which doesn't actually
type-check the number of arguments.
Change-Id: I0731a9fefca46fb1c266bfb1c33d464cf451a22e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1582
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Several callers of EVP_EncodeBlock are doing ad-hoc versions of this
function without any overflow checks.
Change-Id: I4d0cad2347ea8c44b42465e8b14b2783db69ee8f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1511
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I908d207ccd3d529ec09c687effc2aeb4631127d9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1470
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, public headers lived next to the respective code and there
were symlinks from include/openssl to them.
This doesn't work on Windows.
This change moves the headers to live in include/openssl. In cases where
some symlinks pointed to the same header, I've added a file that just
includes the intended target. These cases are all for backwards-compat.
Change-Id: I6e285b74caf621c644b5168a4877db226b07fd92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1180
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It was removed in the fork but it turned out to need it.
Change-Id: I21030c8d5befecb63f2c40a59963bec1da1d96fb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1081
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)