Some code relies on OpenSSL's behavior where it allowed for NULL. But this time
add a comment so people don't think this is the convention for new functions.
BUG=538292
Change-Id: I66566e0e24566fafe17e05369276248be3b05591
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6070
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This didn't actually break anything, but it does make session lookup
quite slow.
Change-Id: I13615e8ccf6a46683a21774eb7c073318ae8c28c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6054
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change makes the runner tests (in ssl/test/runner) act like a
normal Go test rather than being a Go binary. This better aligns with
some internal tools.
Thus, from this point onwards, one has to run the runner tests with `go
test` rather than `go run` or `go build && ./runner`.
This will break the bots.
Change-Id: Idd72c31e8e0c2b7ed9939dacd3b801dbd31710dd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6009
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The cipher suite rules could also be anchored on SSL_TXT_* if desired. I
currently documented them in prose largely because SSL_TXT_* also
defines protocol version strings and those are weird; SSL_TXT_TLSV1_1
isn't even a cipher rule. (And, in fact, those are the only SSL_TXT_*
macros that we can't blindly remove. I found some code that #ifdef's the
version SSL_TXT_* macros to decide if version-locked SSL_METHODs are
available.)
Also they clutter the header. I was thinking maybe we should dump a lot
of the random constants into a separate undocumented header or perhaps
just unexport them.
I'm slightly torn on this though and could easily be convinced in the
other direction. (Playing devil's advocate, anchoring on SSL_TXT_* means
we're less likely to forget to document one so long as adding a
SSL_TXT_* macro is the convention.)
Change-Id: Ide2ae44db9d6d8f29c24943090c210da0108dc37
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5962
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The Android system BoringSSL has a couple of changes:
∙ ChaCha20-Poly1305 is disabled because it's not an offical
cipher suite.
∙ P-521 is offered in the ClientHello.
These changes were carried in the Android BoringSSL repo directly. This
change upstreams them when BORINGSSL_ANDROID_SYSTEM is defined.
Change-Id: If3e787c6694655b56e7701118aca661e97a5f26c
Or at least group them together and make a passing attempt to document
them. The legacy X.509 stack itself remains largely untouched and most
of the parameters have to do with it.
Change-Id: I9e11e2ad1bbeef53478c787344398c0d8d1b3876
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5942
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
RSA_PSK is really weird in that it takes a Certificate, but you're not
expected to verify it. It's just a funny way to transmit an RSA key.
(They probably should have used the RSA_EXPORT ServerKeyExchange
spelling.) Some code now already doesn't account for it right around
certificate verification.
Given ECDHE_PSK exists, hopefully there will never be any need to add
this.
Change-Id: Ia64dac28099eaa9021f8d915d45ccbfd62872317
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5941
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Allow configuring digest preferences for the private key. Some
smartcards have limited support for signing digests, notably Windows
CAPI keys and old Estonian smartcards. Chromium used the supports_digest
hook in SSL_PRIVATE_KEY_METHOD to limit such keys to SHA1. However,
detecting those keys was a heuristic, so some SHA256-capable keys
authenticating to SHA256-only servers regressed in the switch to
BoringSSL. Replace this mechanism with an API to configure digest
preference order. This way heuristically-detected SHA1-only keys may be
configured by Chromium as SHA1-preferring rather than SHA1-requiring.
In doing so, clean up the shared_sigalgs machinery somewhat.
BUG=468076
Change-Id: I996a2df213ae4d8b4062f0ab85b15262ca26f3c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5755
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We wish to be able to detect the use of RC4 so that we can flag it and
investigate before it's disabled.
Change-Id: I6dc3a5d2211b281097531a43fadf08edb5a09646
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5930
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex was implemented with a memcpy, which doesn't work well when
some of the pointers need to be copied, and ssl_verify_cert_chain didn't
account for set_ex_data failing.
Change-Id: Ieb556aeda6ab2e4c810f27012fefb1e65f860023
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5911
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Existing documentation was moved to the header, very slightly tweaked.
Change-Id: Ife3c2351e2d7e6a335854284f996918039414446
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5897
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These were already documented, though some of the documentation was
expanded on slightly.
Change-Id: I04c6276a83a64a03ab9cce9b9c94d4dea9ddf638
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5896
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SCT and OCSP are part of the session data and as such shouldn't be sent
again to the client when resuming.
Change-Id: Iaee3a3c4c167ea34b91504929e38aadee37da572
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5900
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ssl.h should be first. Also two lines after includes and the rest of the
file.
Change-Id: Icb7586e00a3e64170082c96cf3f8bfbb2b7e1611
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5892
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Forgot to fix these when I fixed the headers.
Change-Id: Ie45e624abc993e16e2d5a872ef00dba9029a38df
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5891
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This gets the documentation into the ssl.h documentation, and removes
one of the circularly-dependent headers hanging off ssl.h. Also fixes
some typos; there were a few instances of "SSL *ctx".
Change-Id: I2a41c6f518f4780af84d468ed220fe7b0b8eb0d3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5883
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also switch to the new variable names (SSL_CTX *ctx, SSL *ssl,
SSL_SESSION *session) for all documented functions.
Change-Id: I15e15a703b96af1727601108223c7ce3b0691f1d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5882
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is arguably more commonly queried connection information than the
tls-unique.
Change-Id: I1f080536153ba9f178af8e92cb43b03df37110b5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5874
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Just the stuff that has been pulled out into sections already.
Change-Id: I3da6bc61d79ccfe2b18d888075dc32026a656464
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5873
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Unfortunately, these are also some of the worst APIs in the SSL stack.
I've tried to capture all the things they expose to the caller. 0 vs -1
is intentionally left unexpanded on for now. Upstream's documentation
says 0 means transport EOF, which is a nice idea but isn't true. (A lot
of random functions return 0 on error and pass it up to the caller.)
https://crbug.com/466303 tracks fixing that.
SSL_set_bio is intentionally documented to NOT be usable when they're
already configured. The function tries to behave in this case and even
with additional cases when |rbio| and/or |wbio| are unchanged, but this
is buggy. For instance, this will explode:
SSL_set_bio(ssl, bio1, bio1);
SSL_set_bio(ssl, bio2, SSL_get_wbio(ssl));
As will this, though it's less clear this is part of the API contract
due to SSL taking ownership.
SSL_set_bio(ssl, bio1, bio2);
SSL_set_bio(ssl, bio2, bio1);
It also tries to handle ssl->bbio already existing, but I doubt it quite
works. Hopefully we can drop ssl->bbio eventually. (Why is this so
complicated...)
Change-Id: I5f9f3043915bffc67e2ebd282813e04afbe076e6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5872
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Last set of changes didn't do that.
Change-Id: Iae24e75103529ce4d50099c5cbfbcef0e10ba663
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5871
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
clang scan-build found a memory leak if the overflow codepath in
dtls1_hm_fragment is hit. Along the way, tidy up that function.
Change-Id: I3c4b88916ee56ab3ab63f93d4a967ceae381d187
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5870
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_get_client_CA_list is one of those dreaded functions which may query either
configuration state or handshake state. Moreover, it does so based on
|ssl->server|, which may not be configured until later. Also check
|ssl->handshake_func| to make sure |ssl| is not in an indeterminate state.
This also fixes a bug where SSL_get_client_CA_list wouldn't work in DTLS due to
the incorrect |ssl->version| check.
Change-Id: Ie564dbfeecd2c8257fd6bcb148bc5db827390c77
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5827
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ifa44fef160fc9d67771eed165f8fc277f28a0222
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5840
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It was checking algorithm_mac rather than algorithm_enc.
(Coincidentally, it gave the right answer if you compiled out the
ChaCha20 ciphers since SSL_AES128GCM and SSL_AEAD shared a value.)
Change-Id: I17047425ef7fabb98969144965d8db9528ef8497
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5850
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The size of the stack caused by this object is problematic for systems
that have smaller stacks because they expect many threads.
Change-Id: Ib8f03741f9dd96bf474126f001947f879e50a781
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5831
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's not enough in that file to really justify its own file now.
Change-Id: I6130cfce6c40fe9d46aa83dd83e6f38d87fdcf64
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5823
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Quite a lot of consumers of the SSL stack will never need to touch files from
the SSL stack, but enough do that we can't just ditch them. Toss that all into
their own file so a static linker can drop it.
Change-Id: Ia07de939889eb09e3ab16aebcc1b6869ca8b75a0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5820
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Applications may require the stapled OCSP response in order to verify
the certificate within the verification callback.
Change-Id: I8002e527f90c3ce7b6a66e3203c0a68371aac5ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change adds the ability to configure ciphers specifically for
TLS ≥ 1.0. This compliments the existing ability to specify ciphers
for TLS ≥ 1.1.
This is useful because TLS 1.0 is the first version not to suffer from
POODLE. (Assuming that it's implemented correctly[1].) Thus one might
wish to reserve RC4 solely for SSLv3.
[1] https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/12/08/poodleagain.html
Change-Id: I774d5336fead48f03d8a0a3cf80c369692ee60df
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5793
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_CTX gets memset to zero, so many of the values needn't be explicitly
initialized.
Change-Id: I0e707a0dcc052cd6f0a5dc8d037400170bd75594
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5812
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
setup_key_block is called when the first CCS resolves, but for resumptions this
is the incoming CCS (see ssl3_do_change_cipher_spec). Rather than set
need_record_splitting there, it should be set in the write case of
tls1_change_cipher_state.
This fixes a crash from the new record layer code in resumption when
record-splitting is enabled. Tweak the record-splitting tests to cover this
case.
This also fixes a bug where renego from a cipher which does require record
splitting to one which doesn't continues splitting. Since version switches are
not allowed, this can only happen after a renego from CBC to RC4.
Change-Id: Ie4e1b91282b10f13887b51d1199f76be4fbf09ad
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5787
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Note that DTLS treats oversized ciphertexts different from everything else.
Change-Id: I71cba69ebce0debdfc96a7fdeb2666252e8d28ed
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5786
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If the two extensions select different next protocols (quite possible since one
is server-selected and the other is client-selected), things will break. This
matches the behavior of NSS (Firefox) and Go.
Change-Id: Ie1da97bf062b91a370c85c12bc61423220a22f36
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5780
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The maximum buffer size computation wasn't quite done right in
ssl_buffer.c, so we were failing with BUFFER_TOO_SMALL for sufficiently
large records. Fix this and, as penance, add 103 tests.
(Test that we can receive maximum-size records in all cipher suites.
Also test SSL_OP_MICROSOFT_BIG_SSLV3_BUFFER while I'm here.)
BUG=526998
Change-Id: I714c16dda2ed13f49d8e6cd1b48adc5a8491f43c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5785
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The bidi shutdown code uses type = 0 as a special signal value, but code
elsewhere doesn't account for this.
BUG=526437
Change-Id: I090cee421633d70ef3b84f4daa811608031b9ed9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5771
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Bidirectional shutdown doesn't make sense over DTLS; you can't reuse the
underlying channel after receiving close_notify because the channel is
unordered. This removes one caller of dtls1_read_bytes.
Really close_notify makes no sense in DTLS. It can't even protect
against some kind of truncation because it's all unordered. But continue
to send it in case anything is (unreliably since the channel is lossy)
relying on close_notify to signal some kind of session end. This only
makes SSL_shutdown stop trying to wait for one once we've already
decided to shut down the connection.
BUG=526437
Change-Id: I6afad7cb7209c4aba0b96f9246b04c81d90987a9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5770
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
