Response files should have a “.rsp” suffix, and a magic header is needed
in the CTR-DRBG output.
Change-Id: I5dce7929e872cec394e70d3495d76b589e27dd4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15884
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It needs to be taught about modules that are split in two.
Change-Id: Icbf32450eeba2255f40f37c72f1b569a0ebd3a96
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15865
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Nothing is using them. For encrypt, there's generally no need to swap
out public key operations. keygen seems especially pointless as one
could just as easily call the other function directly.
The one behavior change is RSA_encrypt now gracefully detects if called
on an empty RSA, to match the other un-RSA_METHOD-ed functions which had
similar treatments. (Conscrypt was filling in the encrypt function
purely to provide a non-crashing no-op function. They leave the public
bits blank and pass their custom keys through sufficiently many layers
of Java crypto goo that it's not obvious whether this is reachable.)
We still can't take the function pointers out, but once
96bbe03dfd
trickles back into everything, we can finally prune RSA_METHOD.
Bump BORINGSSL_API_VERSION as a convenience so I can land the
corresponding removal in Conscrypt immediately.
Change-Id: Ia2ef4780a5dfcb869b224e1ff632daab8d378b2e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15864
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
(Imported from upstream's 54538204d870b97c751d13efeefa876bd792a44b.)
Change-Id: If9967b67a74ab7dea175e97ea8bda195c3cd0478
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15835
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME and ASN1_UTCTIME may be specified using offsets,
even though that's not supported within certificates. [davidben: This
commit message seems off as crypto/x509 does not reject them. It merely
has a comment telling you that it's doing it wrong.]
To convert the offset time back to GMT, the offsets are supposed to be
subtracted, not added. e.g. 1759-0500 == 2359+0100 == 2259Z.
(Imported from upstream's d2335f30970ed3edc1c7c11700ab7f34396cf086.)
Change-Id: Id0d4c5b650e77db3b04b15e66b069807f6f31266
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15834
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
When a test fails, there should be spaces between the argv of the failed
command line.
Change-Id: I5c168a919c1615df34a0eab63a7232453168adb3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15846
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I forgot to scrub these files when they moved and their macros are
currently leaking into other files. This isn't a problem, but does
prevent ec/ code from being moved into the module at the moment.
Change-Id: I5433fb043e90a03ae3dc5c38cb3a69563aada007
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15845
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Another synthesized function which may be referenced directly.
Change-Id: Ic75fe66ce7244246a2d4a707b6a5fee24cac6941
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15831
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This will let us keep CBS/CBB out of the module. It also makes the PWCT
actually use a hard-coded public key since kEC was using the
private-key-only serialization.
Change-Id: I3769fa26fc789c4797a56534df73f810cf5441c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15830
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This will let us keep CBS/CBB out of the module.
Change-Id: I780de0fa2c102cf27eee2cc242ee23740fbc16ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15829
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The FAX files include extra junk, so we need to strip them out of the
file.
Change-Id: Ib5762a20696a0ca6a847dcc56afa6ea27b02a5cc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15828
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
RSA_verify_raw is the same as RSA_public_decrypt and fits the calling
convention better. This also avoids the extra copy.
Change-Id: Ib7e3152af26872440290a289f178c9a1d9bc673f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15826
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This allows us to implement RSA-PSS in the FIPS module without pulling
in EVP_PKEY. It also allows people to use RSA-PSS on an RSA*.
Empirically folks seem to use the low-level padding functions a lot,
which is unfortunate.
This allows us to remove a now redundant length check in p_rsa.c.
Change-Id: I5270e01c6999d462d378865db2b858103c335485
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15825
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We check the length for MD5+SHA1 but not the normal cases. Instead,
EVP_PKEY_sign externally checks the length (largely because the silly
RSA-PSS padding function forces it). We especially should be checking
the length for these because otherwise the prefix built into the ASN.1
prefix is wrong.
The primary motivation is to avoid putting EVP_PKEY inside the FIPS
module. This means all logic for supported algorithms should live in
crypto/rsa.
This requires fixing up the verify_recover logic and some tests,
including bcm.c's KAT bits.
(evp_tests.txt is now this odd mixture of EVP-level and RSA-level error
codes. A follow-up change will add new APIs for RSA-PSS which will allow
p_rsa.c to be trimmed down and make things consistent.)
Change-Id: I29158e9695b28e8632b06b449234a5dded35c3e7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15824
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I167b7045c537d95294d387936f3d7bad530e1c6f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15844
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Thanks to Alex Gaynor for catching this.
Change-Id: I00e86f90a6ecb845393c0f4f9f8177a053645e70
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15784
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Idb84c8dbd7c0d74d8e56703d18f422a1841b14ba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15744
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I64533d2b4a6b075fa3ccea1abfd0ec5106673453
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15704
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This works better with util/generate_build_files.py.
Change-Id: Icb55dc74e0a004aca3e09978640455b66f0473ff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15648
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is a remnant of the ECDSA code returning a tri-state -1, 0, 1.
Change-Id: I8bd1fcd94e07dbffc650f414ebc19f30236378bd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15667
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The C side no longer supports DHE, so there is no longer a need for the
Go side to anymore.
Change-Id: I5084177becd369779a4008a41f4838cb31adcfde
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15664
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This CL adds utility code to process NIST CAVP test vectors using the
existing FileTest code.
Also add binaries for processing AESAVS (AES) and GCMVS (AES-GCM) vector
files.
Change-Id: I8e5ebf751d7d4b5504bbb52f3e087b0065babbe0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15484
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
When code wants to push a pointer from the GOT onto the stack, we don't
have any registers to play with. We do, however, know that the stack is
viable and thankfully Intel has an “xchg” instruction that avoids the
need for an intermediate register.
Change-Id: Iba7e4f0f4c9b43b3d994cf6cfc92837b312c7728
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15625
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This doesn't actually measure what we need(*) and, because of that, it's
way more noisy than expected.
(*) We want to know whether the pool has been initialised, not whether
it currently thinks it has a lot of bits, but we can't get what we want
without getrandom() support in the kernel.
Change-Id: I20accb99a592739c786a25c1656aeea050ae81a3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15624
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
OPENSSL_ia32cap_addr avoids any relocations within the module, at the
cost of a runtime TEXTREL, which causes problems in some cases.
(Notably, if someone links us into a binary which uses the GCC "ifunc"
attribute, the loader crashes.)
We add a OPENSSL_ia32cap_addr_delta symbol (which is reachable
relocation-free from the module) stores the difference between
OPENSSL_ia32cap_P and its own address. Next, reference
OPENSSL_ia32cap_P in code as usual, but always doing LEAQ (or the
equivalent GOTPCREL MOVQ) into a register first. This pattern we can
then transform into a LEAQ and ADDQ on OPENSSL_ia32cap_addr_delta.
ADDQ modifies the FLAGS register, so this is only a safe transformation
if we safe and restore flags first. That, in turn, is only a safe
transformation if code always uses %rsp as a stack pointer (specifically
everything below the stack must be fair game for scribbling over). Linux
delivers signals on %rsp, so this should already be an ABI requirement.
Further, we must clear the red zone (using LEAQ to avoid touching FLAGS)
which signal handlers may not scribble over.
This also fixes the GOTTPOFF logic to clear the red zone.
Change-Id: I4ca6133ab936d5a13d5c8ef265a12ab6bd0073c9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15545
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Past the first word, the remaining arguments are usually separated by
commas. This avoids some of the awkward fixing up needed to extract
target registers, etc.
Change-Id: Id99b99e5160abf80e60afea96f2b46b53b55c9c5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15544
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OPENSSL_ia32cap_addr avoids any relocations within the module, at the
cost of a runtime TEXTREL, which causes problems in some cases.
(Notably, if someone links us into a binary which uses the GCC "ifunc"
attribute, the loader crashes.)
Fix C references of OPENSSL_ia32cap_addr with a function. This is
analogous to the BSS getters. A follow-up commit will fix perlasm with a
different scheme which avoids calling into a function (clobbering
registers and complicating unwind directives.)
Change-Id: I09d6cda4cec35b693e16b5387611167da8c7a6de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15525
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The test takes a little long to run. I've chopped it to primes up to
20,000. This ensures we still test some values out of range of the table
in crypto/bn/prime.c.
Also remove false comment in crypto/bn/prime.c.
Change-Id: I910015af9570b2f9f1c6c82dc61a0dbdfd24840b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15604
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We only ever compute it for odd (actually, prime) modulus as part of
BN_mod_sqrt.
If we cared, we could probably drop this from most binaries. This is
used to when modular square root needs Tonelli-Shanks. Modular square
root is only used for compressed coordinates. Of our supported curves
(I'm handwaiving away EC_GROUP_new_curve_GFp here[*]), only P-224 needs
the full Tonelli-Shanks algorithm (p is 1 mod 8). That computes the
Legendre symbol a bunch to find a non-square mod p. But p is known at
compile-time, so we can just hard-code a sample non-square.
Sadly, BN_mod_sqrt has some callers outside of crypto/ec, so there's
also that. Anyway, it's also not that large of a function.
[*] Glancing through SEC 2 and Brainpool, secp224r1 is the only curve
listed in either document whose prime is not either 3 mod 4 or 5 mod 8.
Even 5 mod 8 is rare: only secp224k1. It's unlikely anyone would notice
if we broke annoying primes. Though OpenSSL does support "WTLS" curves
which has an additional 1 mod 8 case.
Change-Id: If36aa78c0d41253ec024f2d90692949515356cd1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15425
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
