We assume that AArch64 systems are modern enough to have getauxval.
Change-Id: I4cc74f04ca5ed50b8ca1cfd00afeaaa01c6caca0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3280
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Android didn't have getauxval until Jelly Bean (4.1). This means that
BoringSSL running on older Androids won't be able to detect NEON
support. (This is moot for Chromium because Chromium calls
android_getCpuFeatures and sets the NEON flag itself, but other users of
BoringSSL on Android probably won't do that.)
This change mirrors a little of what upstream does and tries running a
NEON instruction with a handler for SIGILL installed.
Change-Id: I853b85c37ffb049b240582d71fcf07adedc37a30
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3190
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The Android SDK version against which Chromium builds is too old to
include sys/auxv.h. This change switches the ARM code to use a weak
pointer for getauxval and to hard code the aux value numbers.
It also switches the license on cpu-arm.c because there's no OpenSSL
left in there now.
Change-Id: I440cb9d533a06d8b245b189d8e5148fa33e29412
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2880
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is an initial cut at aarch64 support. I have only qemu to test it
however—hopefully hardware will be coming soon.
This also affects 32-bit ARM in that aarch64 chips can run 32-bit code
and we would like to be able to take advantage of the crypto operations
even in 32-bit mode. AES and GHASH should Just Work in this case: the
-armx.pl files can be built for either 32- or 64-bit mode based on the
flavour argument given to the Perl script.
SHA-1 and SHA-256 don't work like this however because they've never
support for multiple implementations, thus BoringSSL built for 32-bit
won't use the SHA instructions on an aarch64 chip.
No dedicated ChaCha20 or Poly1305 support yet.
Change-Id: Ib275bc4894a365c8ec7c42f4e91af6dba3bd686c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2801
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Otherwise, in C, it becomes a K&R function declaration which doesn't actually
type-check the number of arguments.
Change-Id: I0731a9fefca46fb1c266bfb1c33d464cf451a22e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1582
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some phones have a buggy NEON unit and the Poly1305 NEON code fails on
them, even though other NEON code appears to work fine.
This change:
1) Fixes a bug where NEON was assumed even when the code wasn't compiled
in NEON mode.
2) Adds a second NEON control bit that can be disabled in order to run
NEON code, but not the Poly1305 NEON code.
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=341598
Change-Id: Icb121bf8dba47c7a46c7667f676ff7a4bc973625
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1351
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
