Bazel sees BUILD files are markers for different packages. So by having
a file named “BUILD” in the source tree, Bazel thinks that there are
several packages involved.
This change renames it to BUILD.toplevel to avoid this.
Change-Id: Ia76167334cd52f72ff25ecb08533c30e5e423ab8
This reverts commits:
8d79ed674019fdcb52348d79ed6740
Because WebRTC (at least) includes our headers in an extern "C" block,
which precludes having any C++ in them.
Change-Id: Ia849f43795a40034cbd45b22ea680b51aab28b2d
This change scatters the contents of the two scoped_types.h files into
the headers for each of the areas of the code. The types are now in the
|bssl| namespace.
Change-Id: I802b8de68fba4786b6a0ac1bacd11d81d5842423
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We currently have the situation where the |tool| and |bssl_shim| code
includes scoped_types.h from crypto/test and ssl/test. That's weird and
shouldn't happen. Also, our C++ consumers might quite like to have
access to the scoped types.
Thus this change moves some of the template code to base.h and puts it
all in a |bssl| namespace to prepare for scattering these types into
their respective headers. In order that all the existing test code be
able to access these types, it's all moved into the same namespace.
Change-Id: I3207e29474dc5fcc344ace43119df26dae04eabb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Since Bazel doesn't have a shared vs static concept that's exposed to
the build rules (as far as I know) symbol visibility would mean that the
symbols might be exposed when building a larger library. That could be
fixed with a linker script, but this change appears to be slightly more
useful for our consumers.
(Also, if we're going to set -fvisibility=hidden, we should also have set
the defines needed to include the visibility annotations.)
Change-Id: Ic7d64a553da48cfb9cf5460d26254de7e105fd65
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8664
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
When we have *-with-bazel branches this BUILD file will be copied to the
top-level for consumers that want to use Bazel.
From empirical testing, x86-64 on Linux is spelt “k8” and x86-64 on
macOS is spelt “darwin”. I've not tried to enable assembly for any other
cases yet.
Change-Id: Ic6cb739565f145db20756fb57c0d087227fd9e18
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8571
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Bazel wants to know the header files of the targets that it builds too,
so output that in the generated BUILD files.
Change-Id: I5b90908342fc8819ae6bc7ff91eb6f5afc0ddf54
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8570
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Test vectors taken from one run of bc_test with the -bc flag, along with
a handful of manual test vectors around numbers close to zero. (The
output was compared against bc to make sure it was correct.)
BUG=31
Change-Id: I9e9263ece64a877c8497716cd4713b4c3e44248c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8521
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Depending on architecture, perlasm differed on which one or both of:
perl foo.pl flavor output.S
perl foo.pl flavor > output.S
Upstream has now unified on the first form after making a number of
changes to their files (the second does not even work for their x86
files anymore). Sync those portions of our perlasm scripts with upstream
and update CMakeLists.txt and generate_build_files.py per the new
convention.
This imports various commits like this one:
184bc45f683c76531d7e065b6553ca9086564576 (this was done by taking a
diff, so I don't have the full list)
Confirmed that generate_build_files.py sees no change.
BUG=14
Change-Id: Id2fb5b8bc2a7369d077221b5df9a6947d41f50d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8518
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Include all internal headers in |test_support_sources|, since that's
easier than enumerating the ones specifically required for each test.
This incidentally removes test headers from |crypto_internal_headers|
and |ssl_internal_headers|.
Require the crypto and ssl libraries to be passed as arguments to
create_tests(), rather than hardcoding the names :crypto and :ssl
Change-Id: Idcc522298c5baca2a84635ad3a7fdcf6e4968a5a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8260
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Some files were named 𝑥_test.txt and some 𝑥_tests.txt. This change
unifies around the latter.
Change-Id: Id6f29bad8b998f3c3466655097ef593f7f18f82f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8150
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
One of these tests the distribution of noise polynomials; the other
tests that that agreed-upon keys (prior to whitening) have roughly equal
numbers of 0s and 1s.
Along the way, expose a few more API bits.
Change-Id: I6b04708d41590de45d82ea95bae1033cfccd5d67
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8130
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Assembly code for X25519 wasn't included on OS X when built with
build systems other than CMake, which lead to a SIGTRAP due to a
missing x25519_x86_64.
Reported by Gurgen Hrachyan.
Change-Id: Ib6026f31cce0405ec3e75d8a52bf0940e57c62c8
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8111
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The test vectors are taken from the reference implementation, modified
to output the results of its random-number generator, and the results of
key generation prior to SHA3. This allows the interoperability of the
two implementations to be tested somewhat.
To accomplish the testing, this commit creates a new, lower-level API
that leaves the generation of random numbers and all wire encoding and
decoding up to the caller.
Change-Id: Ifae3517696dde4be4a0b7c1998bdefb789bac599
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8070
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also give the main page a title.
Change-Id: I6db588a9454d90a5974de5446d58d709f84d1906
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8020
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The recipes need to run with a funny GOROOT and we were clearing the
environment.
BUG=26
Change-Id: If233a16e060533ad3fa6f215ce596456c2d7afa5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7988
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This will be used by the bots to get adb and the NDK.
BUG=26
Change-Id: Iae07a380c49b4990f0aa7d73c4f0b399924b9784
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7986
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This will let the recipes use the copy pulled from Chromium's android_tools.
BUG=26
Change-Id: Ica6519223b9fb6daef30f3e14c72ef6422de0f6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7982
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's an off-by-one when skipping blank lines. The initial logic also has an
off-by-one but since it starts lineNo 0-based and then switches to 1-based, it
cancels out.
The decl error line number also was not of where the decl began.
Change-Id: I58fd157dad3276cb9de52ac48ff8c7c73e40f337
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7959
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Allow running only one of the test suites. The recipe expects these happen in
two separate steps (it wants only one JSON results file per "step"). Also add
an option to extract the results file.
BUG=26
Change-Id: I0cda19bd9643b66f40a30bc8410a357da33baacc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7945
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Sync a few changes with the upstream one, notably get_toolchain_if_necessary.py
needs GYP_MSVS_VERSION set. Also pull the variables that change up to the top.
This diverges a bit more from the upstream one, but we're already heavily
diverged. If we ever need to support two concurrent toolchains, I'll bring us
closer to parity.
Change-Id: I6db7fbaccd5dddd92ad2deee15bd6dd3e28841f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7830
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Track the Chromium requirements. This makes our bots build with 2015 instead of
2013.
BUG=43
Change-Id: Id5329900a5d1d5fae4b5b22299ed47bc1b947dd8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7820
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
See util/bot/UPDATING for where they come from.
Change-Id: Ib2eae6efc737dd8c4e5fb001fd4b478102e0ad6a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7822
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Chromium uses GN's default configs feature which makes all targets default to a
set of configs. It then expects third_party code to take one of them
(chromium_code) out and put in a different one (no_chromium_code).
Because of that, we need a way to tell the template to emit -= lines. Add a
separate option for that.
(It may be worth making us clean against the chromium_code config rather than
the no_chromium_code one, but I'll explore that separately in case making the C
code clean ends up being a rabbithole.)
BUG=chromium:607294
Change-Id: I2aa179665ab17439cc123fc86a7af9690cd4bcd6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7795
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's not possible to encode an OID with only one component, so some of
the NIDs do not have encodings. The logic to actually encode OIDs checks
for this (before calling der_it), but not the logic to compute the
sorted OID list.
Without this, OBJ_obj2nid, when given an empty OID, returns something
arbitrary based on the binary search implementation instead of
NID_undef.
Change-Id: Ib68bae349f66eff3d193616eb26491b6668d4b0a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7752
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Split gn and gyp generators apart. Since we're pre-generating files, there's no
need to make BoringSSL's build depend on the gypi_to_gn.py script. Also emit
the tests and a list of fuzzers so we don't need to manually update BUILD.gn
each time.
The new gn generator is based on the bazel one since they're fairly similar.
BUG=chromium:429246
Change-Id: I5a819a964d6ac6e56e9251bb3fd3de1db08214a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7726
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It has all of one function in there.
Change-Id: I86f0fbb76d267389c62b63ac01df685acb70535e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7723
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts commit 6f0c4db90e except for the
imported assembly files, which are left as-is but unused. Until upstream fixes
https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4483, we shouldn't ship this
code. Once that bug has been fixed, we'll restore it.
Change-Id: I74aea18ce31a4b79657d04f8589c18d6b17f1578
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7602
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This removes the thread-unsafe SIGILL-based detection and the
multi-consumer-hostile CRYPTO_set_NEON_capable API. (Changing
OPENSSL_armcap_P after initialization is likely to cause problems.)
The right way to detect ARM features on Linux is getauxval. On aarch64,
we should be able to rely on this, so use it straight. Split this out
into its own file. The #ifdefs in the old cpu-arm.c meant it shared all
but no code with its arm counterpart anyway.
Unfortunately, various versions of Android have different missing APIs, so, on
arm, we need a series of workarounds. Previously, we used a SIGILL fallback
based on OpenSSL's logic, but this is inherently not thread-safe. (SIGILL also
does not tell us if the OS knows how to save and restore NEON state.) Instead,
base the behavior on Android NDK's cpu-features library, what Chromium
currently uses with CRYPTO_set_NEON_capable:
- Android before API level 20 does not provide getauxval. Where missing,
we can read from /proc/self/auxv.
- On some versions of Android, /proc/self/auxv is also not readable, so
use /proc/cpuinfo's Features line.
- Linux only advertises optional features in /proc/cpuinfo. ARMv8 makes NEON
mandatory, so /proc/cpuinfo can't be used without additional effort.
Finally, we must blacklist a particular chip because the NEON unit is broken
(https://crbug.com/341598).
Unfortunately, this means CRYPTO_library_init now depends on /proc being
available, which will require some care with Chromium's sandbox. The
simplest solution is to just call CRYPTO_library_init before entering
the sandbox.
It's worth noting that Chromium's current EnsureOpenSSLInit function already
depends on /proc/cpuinfo to detect the broken CPU, by way of base::CPU.
android_getCpuFeatures also interally depends on it. We were already relying on
both of those being stateful and primed prior to entering the sandbox.
BUG=chromium:589200
Change-Id: Ic5d1c341aab5a614eb129d8aa5ada2809edd6af8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7506
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We failed to correctly parse files that executed from the very start of
the file due to a missing '- line XXX'. We now use the 'Ir' indicator to
recognize the beginning of a file.
Change-Id: I529fae9458ac634bf7bf8af61ef18f080e808535
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7542
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I9c5e66c34d0f1b735c69d033daee5d312e3c2fe7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7410
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Built from:
92c83ad8a4fd6224cf6319a60b399854f55b38ebe9d297c942408b792b1a9efa cmake-3.5.0.tar.gz
Update instructions in the UPDATING file.
Change-Id: I49d3f5ef353347c446a04797719227e9793e3e0d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7414
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
See 0d5e080ab9 for the previous version. Include
instructions on where to get the tools used.
807f96230c889b10f2957a47585426af4cdb116a8a77f1caecca83b7d7ab862b cmake-3.5.0-win32-x86.zip
e6bb5c3e4d936bb1067560a58a21260693a0fbe34e55afb0111fe14f7eebc92c strawberry-perl-5.22.1.2-32bit-portable.zip
Change-Id: I504cf779abce26087d09c0c974fb481886c9c459
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7413
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Update the easy ones here. Also include instructions on how to do this. The
.sha1 files will be updated separately with instructions.
Change-Id: I2a3aba43b8ffbdf930b8a2602dc1460077f6d0e7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7412
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The bots will likely use different infrastructure (I expect I'll need to write
an isolate file and such). In the meantime, make it easier to run tests
manually.
BUG=487432
Change-Id: I0e10b23e5f3eb1c5cd60fb88f21ba4a8385b979e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7334
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The coverage tool revealed that we weren't testing all codepaths of the ChaCha
assembly. Add a standalone test as it's much easier to iterate over all lengths
when there isn't the entire AEAD in the way.
I wasn't able to find a really long test vector, so I generated a random one
with the Go implementation we have in runner.
This test gives us full coverage on the ChaCha20_ssse3 variant. (We'll see how
it fares on the other codepaths when the multi-variant test harnesses get in. I
certainly hope there isn't a more novel way to call ChaCha20 than this...)
Change-Id: I087e421c7351f46ea65dacdc7127e4fbf5f4c0aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7299
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Uses LCOV for C(++) line coverage and Valgrind's Callgrind tool to
generate assembly-level line coverage for the generated assembly
code.
BUG=590332
Change-Id: Ic70300a272c38f4fa6dd615747db568aa0853584
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7251
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
A len(tests) should have been len(testCases), the code never added to the
sync.WaitGroup, and feeding tests to the tests channel blocks on the tests
completing, so with one worker the results didn't stream. (And if the results
channel wasn't large enough, we'd deadlock.)
Change-Id: Iee37507b9706b14cffddd9c1b55fc311ee9b666d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7292
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Use -num-workers to run multiple workers in parallel when running tests.
Change-Id: Iee5554ee78ec8d77700a0df5a297bd2515d34dca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7285
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The high bits of the type get used for the V_ASN1_NEG bit, so when used with
ASN1_ANY/ASN1_TYPE, universal tags become ambiguous. This allows one to create
a negative zero, which should be impossible. Impose an upper bound on universal
tags accepted by crypto/asn1 and add a test.
BUG=590615
Change-Id: I363e01ebfde621c8865101f5bcbd5f323fb59e79
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7238
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The C implementation is still our existing C implementation, but slightly
tweaked to fit with upstream's init/block/emits convention.
I've tested this by looking at code coverage in kcachegrind and
valgrind --tool=callgrind --dump-instr=yes --collect-jumps=yes
(NB: valgrind 3.11.0 is needed for AVX2. And even that only does 64-bit AVX2,
so we can't get coverage for the 32-bit code yet. But I had to disable that
anyway.)
This was paired with a hacked up version of poly1305_test that would repeat
tests with different ia32cap and armcap values. This isn't checked in, but we
badly need a story for testing all the different variants.
I'm not happy with upstream's code in either the C/asm boundary or how it
dispatches between different versions, but just debugging the code has been a
significant time investment. I'd hoped to extract the SIMD parts and do the
rest in C, but I think we need to focus on testing first (and use that to
guide what modifications would help). For now, this version seems to work at
least.
The x86 (not x86_64) AVX2 code needs to be disabled because it's broken. It
also seems pretty unnecessary.
https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4346
Otherwise it seems to work and buys us a decent performance improvement.
Notably, my Nexus 6P is finally faster at ChaCha20-Poly1305 than my Nexus 4!
bssl speed numbers follow:
x86
---
Old:
Did 1554000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000536us (1553167.5 ops/sec): 24.9 MB/s
Did 136000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003947us (135465.3 ops/sec): 182.9 MB/s
Did 30000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1022990us (29325.8 ops/sec): 240.2 MB/s
Did 1888000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000206us (1887611.2 ops/sec): 30.2 MB/s
Did 173000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003036us (172476.4 ops/sec): 232.8 MB/s
Did 30000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1027759us (29189.7 ops/sec): 239.1 MB/s
New:
Did 2030000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000507us (2028971.3 ops/sec): 32.5 MB/s
Did 404000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000287us (403884.1 ops/sec): 545.2 MB/s
Did 83000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1001258us (82895.7 ops/sec): 679.1 MB/s
Did 2018000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000006us (2017987.9 ops/sec): 32.3 MB/s
Did 360000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001962us (359295.1 ops/sec): 485.0 MB/s
Did 85000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1002479us (84789.8 ops/sec): 694.6 MB/s
x86_64, no AVX2
---
Old:
Did 2023000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000258us (2022478.2 ops/sec): 32.4 MB/s
Did 466000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1002619us (464782.7 ops/sec): 627.5 MB/s
Did 90000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1001133us (89898.1 ops/sec): 736.4 MB/s
Did 2238000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000175us (2237608.4 ops/sec): 35.8 MB/s
Did 483000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001348us (482349.8 ops/sec): 651.2 MB/s
Did 90000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1003141us (89718.2 ops/sec): 735.0 MB/s
New:
Did 2558000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000275us (2557296.7 ops/sec): 40.9 MB/s
Did 510000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001810us (509078.6 ops/sec): 687.3 MB/s
Did 115000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1006457us (114262.2 ops/sec): 936.0 MB/s
Did 2818000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000187us (2817473.1 ops/sec): 45.1 MB/s
Did 418000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001140us (417524.0 ops/sec): 563.7 MB/s
Did 91000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1002539us (90769.5 ops/sec): 743.6 MB/s
x86_64, AVX2
---
Old:
Did 2516000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000115us (2515710.7 ops/sec): 40.3 MB/s
Did 774000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000300us (773767.9 ops/sec): 1044.6 MB/s
Did 171000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1004373us (170255.5 ops/sec): 1394.7 MB/s
Did 2580000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000144us (2579628.5 ops/sec): 41.3 MB/s
Did 769000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000472us (768637.2 ops/sec): 1037.7 MB/s
Did 169000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000320us (168945.9 ops/sec): 1384.0 MB/s
New:
Did 3240000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000114us (3239630.7 ops/sec): 51.8 MB/s
Did 932000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000059us (931945.0 ops/sec): 1258.1 MB/s
Did 217000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1003282us (216290.1 ops/sec): 1771.8 MB/s
Did 3187000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000100us (3186681.3 ops/sec): 51.0 MB/s
Did 926000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000071us (925934.3 ops/sec): 1250.0 MB/s
Did 215000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000479us (214897.1 ops/sec): 1760.4 MB/s
arm, Nexus 4
---
Old:
Did 430248 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000153us (430182.2 ops/sec): 6.9 MB/s
Did 115250 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000549us (115186.8 ops/sec): 155.5 MB/s
Did 27000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1030124us (26210.4 ops/sec): 214.7 MB/s
Did 451750 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000549us (451502.1 ops/sec): 7.2 MB/s
Did 118000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1001557us (117816.6 ops/sec): 159.1 MB/s
Did 27000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1024263us (26360.4 ops/sec): 215.9 MB/s
New:
Did 553644 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000183us (553542.7 ops/sec): 8.9 MB/s
Did 126000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000396us (125950.1 ops/sec): 170.0 MB/s
Did 27000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000336us (26990.9 ops/sec): 221.1 MB/s
Did 559000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1001465us (558182.3 ops/sec): 8.9 MB/s
Did 124000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000824us (123897.9 ops/sec): 167.3 MB/s
Did 28000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1034854us (27057.0 ops/sec): 221.7 MB/s
aarch64, Nexus 6P
---
Old:
Did 358000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000358us (357871.9 ops/sec): 5.7 MB/s
Did 45000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1022386us (44014.7 ops/sec): 59.4 MB/s
Did 8657 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1063722us (8138.4 ops/sec): 66.7 MB/s
Did 350000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000074us (349974.1 ops/sec): 5.6 MB/s
Did 44000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1007907us (43654.8 ops/sec): 58.9 MB/s
Did 8525 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1042644us (8176.3 ops/sec): 67.0 MB/s
New:
Did 713000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000190us (712864.6 ops/sec): 11.4 MB/s
Did 180000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1004249us (179238.4 ops/sec): 242.0 MB/s
Did 41000 ChaCha20-Poly1305 (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1005811us (40763.1 ops/sec): 333.9 MB/s
Did 775000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000719us (774443.2 ops/sec): 12.4 MB/s
Did 182000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1003529us (181360.0 ops/sec): 244.8 MB/s
Did 41000 ChaCha20-Poly1305-Old (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1010576us (40570.9 ops/sec): 332.4 MB/s
Change-Id: Iaa4ab86ac1174b79833077963cc3616cfb08e686
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7226
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
