Thanks to Denis Denisov for running the analysis.
Change-Id: I80810261e013423e746fd8d8afefb3581cffccc0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1701
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Where possible, functions should return one for success and zero for
error. The use of additional negative values to indicate an error is,
itself, error prone.
This change fixes many EVP functions to remove the possibility of
negative return values. Existing code that is testing for <= 0 will
continue to function, although there is the possibility that some code
was differentiating between negative values (error) and zero (invalid
signature) for the verify functions and will now show the wrong error
message.
Change-Id: I982512596bb18a82df65861394dbd7487783bd3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1333
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
