The motiviation is that M2Crypto passes an ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME to
this function.  This is not distinct from ASN1_UTCTIME (both are
asn1_string_st), but ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME uses a 4-digit year in its
string representation, whereas ASN1_UTCTIME uses a 2-digit year.

ASN1_UTCTIME_print previously did not return an error on such inputs.
So, stricten (?) the function, ensuring that it checks for trailing
data, and rejects values that are invalid for their place.  Along the
way, clean it up and add tests.

Change-Id: Ia8298bed573f2acfdab96638ea69c78b5bba4e4b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13082
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

The naming breaks layering, but it seems we're stuck with it. We don't
seem to have bothered making first-party code call it BIO_print_errors
(I found no callers of BIO_print_errors), so let's just leave it at
ERR_print_errors.

Change-Id: Iddc22a6afc2c61d4b94ac555be95079e0f477171
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11960
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

(Imported from upstream's 01c32b5e448f6d42a23ff16bdc6bb0605287fa6f.)

Change-Id: Ib52278dbbac1ed1ad5c80f0ad69e34584d411cec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7461
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

All the signature algorithm logic depends on X509_ALGOR. This also
removes the X509_ALGOR-based EVP functions which are no longer used
externally. I think those APIs were a mistake on my part. The use in
Chromium was unnecessary (and has since been removed anyway). The new
X.509 stack will want to process the signatureAlgorithm itself to be
able to enforce policies on it.

This also moves the RSA_PSS_PARAMS bits to crypto/x509 from crypto/rsa.
That struct is also tied to crypto/x509. Any new RSA-PSS code would
have to use something else anyway.

BUG=499653

Change-Id: I6c4b4573b2800a2e0f863d35df94d048864b7c41
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7025
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

OpenSSL upstream did a bulk reformat. We still have some files that have
the old OpenSSL style and this makes applying patches to them more
manual, and thus more error-prone, than it should be.

This change is the result of running
  util/openssl-format-source -v -c .
in the enumerated directories. A few files were in BoringSSL style and
have not been touched.

This change should be formatting only; no semantic difference.

Change-Id: I75ced2970ae22b9facb930a79798350a09c5111e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6904
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Much of this was done automatically with
  find . -name '*.c' | xargs sed -E -i '' -e 's/(OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR\([a-zA-Z_0-9]+, )[a-zA-Z_0-9]+, ([a-zA-Z_0-9]+\);)/\1\2/'
  find . -name '*.c' | xargs sed -E -i '' -e 's/(OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR\([a-zA-Z_0-9]+, )[a-zA-Z_0-9]+,  ([a-zA-Z_0-9]+\);)/\1\2/'

BUG=468039

Change-Id: I4c75fd95dff85ab1d4a546b05e6aed1aeeb499d8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5276
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

(Imported from upstream's 004efdbb41f731d36bf12d251909aaa08704a756.)

The outer algorithm is already printed at the bottom of the function. This
allows any tools which print the X509 this way to determine if there is a
mismatch. This is also the point where the TBSCertificate is printed, not the
Certificate. See upstream's RT #3665.

Change-Id: I89baa4e4b626abf8813545a90eaa4409489ad893
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3022
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Change-Id: I6f334911f153395a2e5e26adfd08912a1d8c558b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2847
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

PR#3403

(Imported from upstream's e42c208235)

Change-Id: Ibcdd8c95604f661055bfb1e91b15fd3686a04c0d

Since crypto/ebcdic.{c,h} are not present in BoringSSL, remove the #ifdefs
Changes were made by running

find . -type f -name *.c | xargs unifdef -m -U CHARSET_EBCDIC
find . -type f -name *.h | xargs unifdef -m -U CHARSET_EBCDIC

using unifdef 2.10.

An additional two ifdefs (CHARSET_EBCDIC_not) were removed manually.

Change-Id: Ie174bb00782cc44c63b0f9fab69619b3a9f66d42
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1093
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Initial fork from f2d678e6e8 (1.0.2 beta).

(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)