We don't allow consumers to enable and disable RSA and ECDSA signature
algorithms but will filter client-sent cipher suites and server-sent
client certificate types based on this hard-coded list.
This is two less places to update for Ed25519.
BUG=187
Change-Id: I62836b6980acc6d03ee254f0a84e9826668e9e57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14567
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
With public keys reliably extractable from SSL_PRIVATE_KEY_METHOD keys,
we can share the pkey/sigalg check between signing and verifying.
BUG=188
Change-Id: Ieb9382807781e48ffed720b27f450847d3fca788
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14566
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Instead, extract it from the certificate, which is what everyone was
doing anyway. A follow-up change will take advantage of this cleanup to
deduplicate code between signing and verifying for which keys are good
for which signature algorithms.
BUG=188
Change-Id: Ic3f83a6477e8fa53e5e7233f4545f4d2c4b58d01
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14565
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is an unhelpfully generic name. Rename it to match SSL_ECDH_CTX.
Unqualified "public key" is typically assumed to be the certificate.
Change-Id: I8ba8c3f2bb1343d1c006845a1110e833451c5a56
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14564
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This allows us to share some of the is_ecdsa mess between signing and
verifying in a way that will generalize to Ed25519. This makes it a lot
shorter and gets us closer to Ed25519.
Later work will tidy this up further.
BUG=187
Change-Id: Ibf3c07c48824061389b8c86294225d9ef25dd82d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14448
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Right now this is just a wrapper over EVP_Digest and EVP_PKEY_sign. A
later change will introduce a sign_message hook to EVP_PKEY_METHOD which
Ed25519 and other single-shot-only algorithms can implement.
(EVP_PKEY_sign does not quite work for this purpose as all the other key
types believe EVP_PKEY_sign acts on a pre-hashed input.)
BUG=187
Change-Id: Ia4bbf61b25cc4a0d64bcb4364805fe9b5a6e829c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14447
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Empirically, people find the command-line flag and documentation
confusing. (I've seen people try using -session-in and -resume at the
same time.)
Also fail if both flags are passed together.
Change-Id: Idd59b019b4842fe99ec8974dbe6a3f4ce27eb855
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14685
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We received an external request to add an option to undo the check added
in 3e51757de2.
Change-Id: Ifdd4b07705f2fa3d781d775d5cd139ea72d36734
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14644
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
On malloc error, CRYPTO_set_ex_data may fail. (See upstream's
62f488d31733e5dc77b339f905b44f165550e47d.)
It also failed to copy the reserved slots when we revised the app-data
machinery, although this is unreachable as EC_KEY is the only thing
which uses this function and EC_KEY has no reserved slots. (We probably
can/should also take CRYPTO_dup_ex_data out of there, as it's a little
bit weird...)
Change-Id: I60bbc301f919d4c0ee7fff362f979f6ec18d73b7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14604
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
(Thanks to Sam Panzer for the patch.)
At least some linkers will drop constructor functions if no symbols from
that translation unit are used elsewhere in the program. On POWER, since
the cached capability value isn't a global in crypto.o (like other
platforms), the constructor function is getting discarded.
The C++11 spec says (3.6.2, paragraph 4):
It is implementation-defined whether the dynamic initialization of a
non-local variable with static storage duration is done before the
first statement of main. If the initialization is deferred to some
point in time after the first statement of main, it shall occur
before the first odr-use (3.2) of any function or variable defined
in the same translation unit as the variable to be initialized.
Compilers appear to interpret that to mean they are allowed to drop
(i.e. indefinitely defer) constructors that occur in translation units
that are never used, so they can avoid initializing some part of a
library if it's dropped on the floor.
This change makes the hardware capability value for POWER a global in
crypto.c, which should prevent the constructor function from being
ignored.
Change-Id: I43ebe492d0ac1491f6f6c2097971a277f923dd3e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14664
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This was a mess. HMAC_CTX_copy_ex would avoid having to cleanup and init
the HMAC_CTX repeatedly, but even that is unnecessary. hctx_tpl was just
to reuse the key. Instead, HMAC_CTX already can be reset with the same
key. (Alas, with a slightly odd API, but so it goes.) Do that, and use
goto err to cleanup the error-handling.
Thanks to upstream's b98530d6e09f4cb34c791b8840e936c1fc1467cf for
drawing attention to this. (Though we've diverged significantly from
upstream with all the heap-allocated bits, so I didn't use the change
itself.)
While I'm here, tidy up some variable names and cite the newer RFC.
Change-Id: Ic1259f46b7c5a14dc341b8cee385be5508ac4daf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14605
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This moves the early data switch to CERT to make this
|SSL_set_SSL_CTX|-proof.
Change-Id: Icca96e76636d87578deb24b2d507cabee7e46a4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14545
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These static output buffers are a legacy from a time before processes
had threads. This change drops support and callers who were depending on
this (of which there are hopefully none) will crash.
Change-Id: I7b8eb3440def507f92543e55465f821dfa02c7da
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14528
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Taken from revision 3cb07270c9455e8ad27956a70891c962d121a228 of
go-crypto. Some of the changes look like they might fix some of the
crashes we've been having on ARM bots?
Change-Id: I127fd358db553eae4805e777011a89124f595ff0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14544
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I32b37306265e89afca568f20bfba2e04559c4f0b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14527
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We've got to get a bot for this...
Change-Id: I6af0c466c10ec52bf2e67f1e6fa2513411aeb3c0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14524
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Change-Id: Ie43ffabfdf5b10fbb0c8adcc2626a2913152e5e1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14525
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
and relying on a compiler to generate code for unaligned access. Both gcc
and llvm currently do that but llvm is going to change to generate code for
aligned access. The change in llvm will break SHA-1 on POWER without this fix.
Change-Id: If9393968288cf94b684ad340e3ea295e03174aa9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14378
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There are a few test vectors which were not imported from djb's. Mirror
those. Also as RFC 8032 uses a slightly different private key
representation, document this in curve25519.h.
BUG=187
Change-Id: I119381168ba1af9b332365fd8f974fba41759d57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14445
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is a remnant of a previous iteration of the SSL client certificate
bridging logic in Chromium.
Change-Id: Ifa8e15cc970395f179e2f6db65c97a342af5498d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14444
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Clients or servers enabling both should not stop functioning.
Change-Id: I5cca09f8adfc8ff56b8943123847bbdaf8885cf4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14485
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is slightly tidier than casting through function pointers. (Also
more defined? But we cast T* => void* within a function pointer all over
the place, so that's probably a lost cause.)
Change-Id: I8f435906f3066d1377eababf940e3db34c626acd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14313
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We only need the size_t ones now.
BUG=22
Change-Id: Ie6935656bbc4bd2b602b8fad78effc401c493416
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14312
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Not that this is remotely necessary since the code bounds to 1MB, the
caller bounds to INT_MAX (due to EVP_CIPHER) and the grandcaller bounds
to 16k (due to TLS).
BUG=22
Change-Id: Ia75990a30bac26ca617532630340ff94a88e4e20
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14311
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is redundant because these "AEAD"s are not meant to be used outside
of TLS, but since we've moved them into their own layer, they should
check internally.
Change-Id: Ieb3541b2e494902527c2bb56a816cef620cb237b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14310
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This makes it a bit easier to see what is what.
Change-Id: I0f73f6ffa84bd30de3efcbf2bd34e1d3a889d1ee
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14309
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUG=22
Change-Id: I9f392eef44e83efb4b13931acb2a3c642cbf1f29
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14308
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUG=22
Change-Id: I5bfa543c261623d125e7a25cea905e3b90b0c014
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14307
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These will be used in follow-up commits. The _s names are taken from
upstream, to ease importing code. I've also promoted the CONSTTIME_*
macros from the test. None of them are really necessary except
~0u cannot substitute for CONSTTIME_TRUE_S on 64-bit platforms, so
having the macros seems safer.
Once everything is converted, I expect the unsigned versions can be
removed, so I've made the _8 and _int functions act on size_t rather
than unsigned. The users of these functions basically only believe that
array indices and bytes exist.
BUG=22
Change-Id: I987bfb0c708dc726a6f2afcb05b6619bbd600564
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14306
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_CTX_set_signed_cert_timestamp_list fails now if its input is not
well-formed.
Change-Id: I84a4034f66868da11f98bf33e5b7f5c9fc958933
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14484
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Since any ALPN mismatch and other cause for early data rejection will
cause the server to revert to the non-early data path, this is safe to
flip on for all the fuzzers.
BUG=76
Change-Id: I573740ef8f455915820943d82247fb6bfc37ae41
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14465
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Previously we only needed to be able to serve P-224 certificates, but
now we anticipate a need to be able to connect and validate them also.
Since this requires advertising support for P-224 in the handshake, we
need to support P-224 ECDHE too.
P-224 support is disabled by default and so clients need to both set the
enabled curves explicitly and set a maximum version of TLS 1.2.
Change-Id: Idc69580f47334e0912eb431a0db0e78ee2eb5bbe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14225
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Allow the fuzzers to treat this situation, if they ever discover it,
as a bug.
Change-Id: Ie6f1562e9b185d49463cf1a6db28d28780169b11
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14424
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: Ied6b73fde61eb133c9871b42a56aa5a64131b67b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14328
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=185
Change-Id: I4ce6735ca78cd687538a8c0fdbd78ee97b93585c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14382
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This pulls in upstream's 0822d41b6d54132df96c02cc6f6fa9b179378351 and a
portion of a285992763f3961f69a8d86bf7dfff020a08cef9. The former, in
particular, fixes a crash on iOS.
Change-Id: I3c083975d8d11e58b5a2919fcabbf83628f36340
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14383
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
When we refactored all the buffering logic, we retained upstream
OpenSSL's allocation patterns. In particular, we always allocated fixed
size write buffer, even though, unlike when reading, we trivially know a
tighter bound (namely however much we happen to be writing right now).
Since the cutoff for when Windows' malloc starts having a hard time is
just below the TLS maximum record size, do the more natural thing of
allocating what we need to hold outgoing ciphertext.
(This only does anything to the write half. Read half is a bit more
involved.)
BUG=chromium:524258
Change-Id: I0165f9ce822b9cc413f3c77e269e6154160537a7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14405
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We now have another non-OpenSSL perlasm file.
Change-Id: Id5ab606089f22a4cb4c7d29f2cf7d140b66861f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14404
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Remove another remnant of the SSL3_PROTOCOL_METHOD hook.
Change-Id: If6bf055e2ee318420e4c5c40b8eb5356eadda68c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14381
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BUG=76
Change-Id: I68bc1dce13af9155b385a7b589480aacf02ec0db
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14380
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BUG=76
Change-Id: Ie894ea5d327f88e66b234767de437dbe5c67c41d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12960
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=76
Change-Id: I43672ee82a50f8fe706a5d607ef774a6e96db252
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14379
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This ends up under half the size of the original file.
BUG=129
Change-Id: Idec69d9517bd57cee6b3b83bc0cce05396565b70
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14305
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
OPENSSL_free will handle NULL.
Change-Id: I18593a015cd4a081c2eeebf0cd738a024d02a97d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14373
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It still depends on crypto/x509, but we will need a CRYPTO_BUFFER
version of PKCS7_get_certificates for Chromium. Start with this.
BUG=54
Change-Id: I62dcb9ba768091ce37dc9fe819f4f14ac025219c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14372
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I5e1302d75f863fb2e531d431a4e3ecfd90e0dca1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14376
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
