We usually name output parameters 'out'. (Someone made a C++ templating
change in Chromium which messed up const-ness, saw the compile error,
and thought it was in MD5_Final.) Also tag the parameters with the
sizes.
Sadly, there's a bit of goofiness around SHA224_Final/SHA256_Final and
SHA384_Final/SHA512_Final, but they're just documentation anyway.
(Though it does touch on the mess that is sha->md_len which would be
nice to clear through somehow.)
Change-Id: I1918b7eecfe13f13b217d01d4414ac2358802354
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/35484
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In neither OpenSSL nor BoringSSL can this function actually fail, but
OpenSSL makes it return one anyway. Match them for compatibility.
Change-Id: I497437321ad9ccc5da738f06cd5b19c467167575
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28784
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Although we are derived from 1.0.2, we mimic 1.1.0 in some ways around
our FOO_up_ref functions and opaque libssl types. This causes some
difficulties when porting third-party code as any OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
checks for 1.1.0 APIs we have will be wrong.
Moreover, adding accessors without changing OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER can
break external projects. It is common to implement a compatibility
version of an accessor under #ifdef as a static function. This then
conflicts with our headers if we, unlike OpenSSL 1.0.2, have this
function.
This change switches OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER to 1.1.0 and atomically adds
enough accessors for software with 1.1.0 support already. The hope is
this will unblock hiding SSL_CTX and SSL_SESSION, which will be
especially useful with C++-ficiation. The cost is we will hit some
growing pains as more 1.1.0 consumers enter the ecosystem and we
converge on the right set of APIs to import from upstream.
It does not remove any 1.0.2 APIs, so we will not require that all
projects support 1.1.0. The exception is APIs which changed in 1.1.0 but
did not change the function signature. Those are breaking changes.
Specifically:
- SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb is now const-correct.
- X509_get0_signature is now const-correct.
For C++ consumers only, this change temporarily includes an overload
hack for SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb that keeps the old callback working.
This is a workaround for Node not yet supporting OpenSSL 1.1.0.
The version number is set at (the as yet unreleased) 1.1.0g to denote
that this change includes https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4384.
Bug: 91
Change-Id: I5eeb27448a6db4c25c244afac37f9604d9608a76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10340
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Thanks to Lennart Beringer for pointing that that malloc failures could
lead to invalid EVP_MD_CTX states. This change cleans up the code in
general so that fallible operations are all performed before mutating
objects. Thus failures should leave objects in a valid state.
Also, |ctx_size| is never zero and a hash with no context is not
sensible, so stop handling that case and simply assert that it doesn't
occur.
Change-Id: Ia60c3796dcf2f772f55e12e49431af6475f64d52
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20544
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
crypto/{asn1,x509,x509v3,pem} were skipped as they are still OpenSSL
style.
Change-Id: I3cd9a60e1cb483a981aca325041f3fbce294247c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19504
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This restores the original version of delocate.go, with the subsequent
bugfixes patched in. With this, the FIPS module builds with GCC and
Clang, with and without optimizations. I did patch over a variant of the
macro though, since it was otherwise really wordy.
Playing games with sections was a little overly clever and relied on the
compiler not performing a number of optimizations. Clang blew threw all
of those assumptions.
Change-Id: Ib4da468a5925998457994f9e392cf0c04573fe91
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14805
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
