There are still a ton of them, almost exclusively complaints that
function declaration and definitions have different parameter names. I
just fixed a few randomly.

Change-Id: I1072f3dba8f63372cda92425aa94f4aa9e3911fa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18706
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>

BUG=129

Change-Id: Ifcdacb2f5f59fd03b757f88778ceb1e672208fd9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16744
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Support for platforms that we don't support FIPS on doesn't need to be
in the module. Also, functions for dealing with whether fork-unsafe
buffering is enabled are left out because they aren't implementing any
cryptography and they use global r/w state, making their inclusion
painful.

Change-Id: I71a0123db6f5449e9dfc7ec7dea0944428e661aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15084
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This isn't actually used yet, but implements CTR-DRBG from SP 800-90Ar1.
Specifically, it always uses AES-256 and no derivation function.

Change-Id: Ie82b829590226addd7c165eac410a5d584858bfd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14891
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>