This sort of test is more suitable for ssl_test than runner. This should
stress all the various cases around padding. Use tickets rather than
hostnames to inflate the ClientHello because there's a fairly tight
maximum hostname length.
Change-Id: Ibd43aaa7acb9bf5fa00a9d2548d2101e5bb147d3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5480
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Mirrors SSL_SESSION_to_bytes. It avoids having to deal with object-reuse, the
non-size_t length parameter, and trailing data. Both it and the object-reuse
variant back onto an unexposed SSL_SESSION_parse which reads a CBS.
Note that this changes the object reuse story slightly. It's now merely an
optional output pointer that frees its old contents. No d2i_SSL_SESSION
consumer in Google that's built does reuse, much less reuse with the assumption
that the top-level object won't be overridden.
Change-Id: I5cb8522f96909bb222cab0f342423f2dd7814282
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5121
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If we're going to have PSK and use standard cipher suites, this might be
the best that we can do for the moment.
Change-Id: I35d9831b2991dc5b23c9e24d98cdc0db95919d39
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5052
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is the best PSK cipher suite, but it's non-standard and nobody is
using it. Trivial to bring back in the future if we have need of it.
Change-Id: Ie78790f102027c67d1c9b19994bfb10a2095ba92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5051
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The old upstream logic actually didn't do this, but 1.1.0's new code does.
Given that the version has never changed and even unknown fields were rejected
by the old code, this seems a safe and prudent thing to do.
Change-Id: I09071585e5183993b358c10ad36fc206f8bceeda
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4942
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The original OpenSSL implementation did the same. M_ASN1_D2I_Finish checks
this. Forwards compatibility with future sessions with unknown fields is
probably not desirable.
Change-Id: I116a8c482cbcc47c3fcc31515c4a3718f66cf268
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4941
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This isn't exhaustive. There are still failures in some tests which probably
ought to get C++'d first.
Change-Id: Iac58df9d98cdfd94603d54374a531b2559df64c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4795
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This will be reverted in a minute. The bots should run both suites of tests and
report the names of all failing tests in the summary.
Change-Id: Ibe351017dfa8ccfd182b3c88eee413cd2cbdeaf0
Rather than shoehorn real ciphers and cipher aliases into the same type (that's
what cipher->valid is used for), treat them separately. Make
ssl_cipher_apply_rule match ciphers by cipher_id (the parameter was ignored and
we assumed that masks uniquely identify a cipher) and remove the special cases
around zero for all the masks. This requires us to remember which fields
default to 0 and which default to ~0u, but the logic is much clearer.
Finally, now that ciphers and cipher aliases are different, don't process rules
which sum together an actual cipher with cipher aliases. This would AND
together the masks for the alias with the values in the cipher and do something
weird around alg_ssl. (alg_ssl is just weird in general, as everyone trying to
disable SSLv3 in OpenSSL recently discovered.)
With all that, we can finally remove cipher->valid which was always one.
Change-Id: Iefcfe159bd6c22dbaea3a5f1517bd82f756dcfe1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4284
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A previous change in BoringSSL renamed ERR_print_errors_fp to
BIO_print_errors_fp as part of refactoring the code to improve the
layering of modules within BoringSSL. Rename it back for better
compatibility with code that was using the function under the original
name. Move its definition back to crypto/err using an implementation
that avoids depending on crypto/bio.
Change-Id: Iee7703bb1eb4a3d640aff6485712bea71d7c1052
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4310
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These are the remaining untested cipher suites. Rather than add support in
runner.go, just remove them altogether. Grepping for this is a little tricky,
but nothing enables aNULL (all occurrences disable it), and all occurrences of
["ALL:] seem to be either unused or explicitly disable anonymous ciphers.
Change-Id: I4fd4b8dc6a273d6c04a26e93839641ddf738343f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4258
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_CIPHER_get_rfc_name still returns an allocated string.
Change-Id: Ie2f14626c1ff22d0ea613b22439b7de5c04c9062
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4190
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Align with upstream's renames from a while ago. These names are considerably
more standard. This also aligns with upstream in that both "ECDHE" and "EECDH"
are now accepted in the various cipher string parsing bits.
Change-Id: I84c3daeacf806f79f12bc661c314941828656b04
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4053
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Saves making a temporary SSL_CTX and looking at its insides.
Change-Id: Ia351b9b91aec8b813ad7b6e373773396f0975f9a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3561
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Win64 fires significantly more warnings than Win32. Also some recent
changes made it grumpy.
(We might want to reconsider enabling all of MSVC's warnings. Given the sorts
of warnings some of these are, I'm not sure MSVC's version of -Wall -Werror is
actually tenable. Plus, diverging from the Chromium build, especially before
the bots are ready, is going to break pretty readily.)
Change-Id: If3b8feccf910ceab4a233b0731e7624d7da46f87
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3420
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OpenSSL's internal names for the ciphers are not the standard ones and are not
easy to consistently map to the standard ones. Add an API to get the real names
out. (WebRTC wants an API to get the standard names out.)
Also change some incorrect flags on SHA-256 TLS 1.2 ciphers;
SSL_HANDSHAKE_MAC_DEFAULT and SSL_HANDSHAKE_MAC_SHA256 are the same after TLS
1.2. A TLS 1.2 cipher should be tagged explicitly with SHA-256. (This avoids
tripping a check in SSL_CIPHER_get_rfc_name which asserts that default-hash
ciphers only ever use SHA-1 or MD5 for the bulk cipher MAC.)
Change-Id: Iaec2fd4aa97df29883094d3c2ae60f0ba003bf07
This makes SSLv23_method go through DTLS_ANY_VERSION's version negotiation
logic. This allows us to get rid of duplicate ClientHello logic. For
compatibility, SSL_METHOD is now split into SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD and a version.
The legacy version-locked methods set min_version and max_version based this
version field to emulate the original semantics.
As a bonus, we can now handle fragmented ClientHello versions now.
Because SSLv23_method is a silly name, deprecate that too and introduce
TLS_method.
Change-Id: I8b3df2b427ae34c44ecf972f466ad64dc3dbb171
There's not much point in retaining the identity hint in the SSL_SESSION. This
avoids the complexity around setting psk_identity hint on either the SSL or the
SSL_SESSION. Introduce a peer_psk_identity_hint for the client to store the one
received from the server.
This changes the semantics of SSL_get_psk_identity_hint; it now only returns
the value configured for the server. The client learns the hint through the
callback. This is compatible with the one use of this API in conscrypt (it
pulls the hint back out to pass to a callback).
Change-Id: I6d9131636b47f13ac5800b4451436a057021054a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2213
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Deprecate the old two-pass version of the function. If the ticket is too long,
replace it with a placeholder value but keep the connection working.
Change-Id: Ib9fdea66389b171862143d79b5540ea90a9bd5fb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2011
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Doing some archeaology, since the initial OpenSSL commit, key_arg has been
omitted from the serialization if key_arg_length was 0. Since this is an
SSLv2-only field and resuming an SSLv2 session with SSLv3+ is not possible,
there is no need to support parsing those sessions.
Interestingly, it is actually not the case that key_arg_length was only ever
set in SSLv2, historically. In the initial commit of OpenSSL, SSLeay 0.8.1b,
key_arg was used to store what appears to be the IV. That was then removed in
the next commit, an import of SSLeay 0.9.0b, at which point key_arg was only
ever set in SSLv3. That is old enough that there is certainly no need to
parse pre-SSLeay-0.9.0b sessions...
Change-Id: Ia768a2d97ddbe60309be20e2efe488640c4776d9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2050
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
+ and - should also be forbidden. Any operation other than appending will mix
up the in_group bits and give unexpected behavior.
Change-Id: Ieaebb9ee6393aa36243d0765e45cae667f977ef5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1803
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's just checking some constants. Also the comment's off now.
Change-Id: I934d32b76c705758ae7c18009d867e9820a4c5a8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1800
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Otherwise, in C, it becomes a K&R function declaration which doesn't actually
type-check the number of arguments.
Change-Id: I0731a9fefca46fb1c266bfb1c33d464cf451a22e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1582
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL reason codes corresponding to alerts have special values. Teach
make_errors.go that values above 1000 are reserved (otherwise it will assign
new values in that namespace). Also fix all the existing reason codes which
corresponded to alerts.
Change-Id: Ieabdf8fd59f4802938616934e1d84e659227cf84
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1212
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley
Brian Smith
Adam Langley