The callback arguments are required to be NULL.
Change-Id: I266ec46efdaca411a7f0c2b645883b2c5bec1c96
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5160
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They'll probably stay that way too, so document it as being an ignored
parameter.
Change-Id: Iff385715f5413290a7186c38ea9ef2dd4fce9b38
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5175
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than rely on Chromium to query SSL_initial_handshake_complete in the
callback (which didn't work anyway because the callback is called afterwards),
move the logic into BoringSSL. BoringSSL already enforces that clients never
offer resumptions on renegotiation (it wouldn't work well anyway as client
session cache lookup is external), so it's reasonable to also implement
in-library that sessions established on a renegotiation are not cached.
Add a bunch of tests that new_session_cb is called when expected.
BUG=501418
Change-Id: I42d44c82b043af72b60a0f8fdb57799e20f13ed5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5171
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also implement it without reference to crypto/asn1 or fake ASN1_INTEGERs and
add a test. Some platform crypto APIs only give back the key size, and not the
encoded signature length. No sense in implementing it twice.
BUG=347404,499653
Change-Id: I9aa27d52674375f8b036e57bb5850f091c9b25dd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5080
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This adds a new API, SSL_set_private_key_method, which allows the consumer to
customize private key operations. For simplicity, it is incompatible with the
multiple slots feature (which will hopefully go away) but does not, for now,
break it.
The new method is only routed up for the client for now. The server will
require a decrypt hook as well for the plain RSA key exchange.
BUG=347404
Change-Id: I35d69095c29134c34c2af88c613ad557d6957614
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5049
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Turns out the safer/simpler method still wasn't quite right. :-)
session->sess_cert isn't serialized and deserialized, which is poor. Duplicate
it manually for now. Leave a TODO to get rid of that field altogether as it's
not especially helpful. The certificate-related fields should be in the
session. The others probably have no reason to be preserved on resumptions at
all.
Test by making bssl_shim.cc assert the peer cert chain is there or not as
expected.
BUG=501220
Change-Id: I44034167629720d6e2b7b0b938d58bcab3ab0abe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5170
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
To account for the changes in ticket renewal, Chromium will need to listen for
new_session_cb to determine whether the handshake produced a new session.
Chromium currently never caches sessions produced on a renegotiation. To retain
that behavior, it'll need to know whether new_session_cb is initial or not.
Rather than maintain duplicate state and listen for SSL_HANDSHAKE_DONE, it's
simpler to just let it query ssl->s3->initial_handshake_complete.
BUG=501418
Change-Id: Ib2f2541460bd09cf16106388e9cfdf3662e02681
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5126
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Platform crypto APIs for PKCS#1 RSA signatures vary between expecting the
caller to prepend the DigestInfo prefix (RSA_sign_raw) and prepending it
internally (RSA_sign). Currently, Chromium implements sign or sign_raw as
appropriate. To avoid needing both variants, the new asynchronous methods will
only expose the higher-level one, sign.
To satisfy ports which previously implemented sign_raw, expose the DigestInfo
prefix as a utility function.
BUG=347404
Change-Id: I04c397b5e9502b2942f6698ecf81662a3c9282e6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4940
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See also upstream's 27c76b9b8010b536687318739c6f631ce4194688, CVE-2015-1791.
Rather than write a dup function, serializing and deserializing the object is
simpler. It also fixes a bug in the original fix where it never calls
new_session_cb to store the new session (for clients which use that callback;
how clients should handle the session cache is much less clear).
The old session isn't pruned as we haven't processed the Finished message yet.
RFC 5077 says:
The server MUST NOT assume that the client actually received the updated
ticket until it successfully verifies the client's Finished message.
Moreover, because network messages are asynchronous, a new SSL connection may
have began just before the client received the new ticket, so any such servers
are broken regardless.
Change-Id: I13b3dc986dc58ea2ce66659dbb29e14cd02a641b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5122
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Mirrors SSL_SESSION_to_bytes. It avoids having to deal with object-reuse, the
non-size_t length parameter, and trailing data. Both it and the object-reuse
variant back onto an unexposed SSL_SESSION_parse which reads a CBS.
Note that this changes the object reuse story slightly. It's now merely an
optional output pointer that frees its old contents. No d2i_SSL_SESSION
consumer in Google that's built does reuse, much less reuse with the assumption
that the top-level object won't be overridden.
Change-Id: I5cb8522f96909bb222cab0f342423f2dd7814282
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5121
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We had aarch64 handled twice, which was a mistake.
Change-Id: Id27fc86cb701a87c11c54b98534108f87e49262d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5131
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BN_copy can fail on malloc failure. The case in crypto/rsa was causing the
malloc tests in all_tests.go to infinite loop.
Change-Id: Id5900512013fba9960444d78a8c056aa4314fb2d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5110
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some of the documentation had the right explanation but the incorrect
function names attached.
Change-Id: I7b479dae6d71a5ac7bc86df5a3890508c3b3d09f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5090
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If we're going to have PSK and use standard cipher suites, this might be
the best that we can do for the moment.
Change-Id: I35d9831b2991dc5b23c9e24d98cdc0db95919d39
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5052
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is the best PSK cipher suite, but it's non-standard and nobody is
using it. Trivial to bring back in the future if we have need of it.
Change-Id: Ie78790f102027c67d1c9b19994bfb10a2095ba92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5051
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We shouldn't have protocol constraints that are sensitive to whether
data is returned synchronously or not.
Per https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/#/c/4112/, the original
limitation was to avoid OpenSSL ABI changes. This is no longer a
concern.
Add tests for the sync and async case. Send the empty records in two
batches to ensure the count is reset correctly.
Change-Id: I3fee839438527e71adb83d437879bb0d49ca5c07
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5040
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We have need of it internally.
Change-Id: I564af468728b22245e8eab384ea7018b7e88cc86
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5022
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ic82ab5de4e231cdf6230ee7262c3c7539404d4a6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5020
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change makes |CBS_get_any_asn1_element| only handle DER elements.
Another function, |CBS_get_any_ber_asn1_element| is exposed internally
for the cases where we need to process BER data.
Change-Id: I544141a1a3d7913986352a8fd9a6d00b9f282652
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4994
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The client and server both have to decide on behaviour when resuming a
session where the EMS state of the session doesn't match the EMS state
as exchanged in the handshake.
Original handshake
| No Yes
------+--------------------------------------------------------------
|
R | Server: ok [1] Server: abort [3]
e No | Client: ok [2] Client: abort [4]
s |
u |
m |
e |
Yes | Server: don't resume No problem
| Client: abort; server
| shouldn't have resumed
[1] Servers want to accept legacy clients. The draft[5] says that
resumptions SHOULD be rejected so that Triple-Handshake can't be done,
but we'll rather enforce that EMS was used when using tls-unique etc.
[2] The draft[5] says that even the initial handshake should be aborted
if the server doesn't support EMS, but we need to be able to talk to the
world.
[3] This is a very weird case where a client has regressed without
flushing the session cache. Hopefully we can be strict and reject these.
[4] This can happen when a server-farm shares a session cache but
frontends are not all updated at once. If Chrome is strict here then
hopefully we can prevent any servers from existing that will try to
resume an EMS session that they don't understand. OpenSSL appears to be
ok here: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg16570.html
[5] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05#section-5.2
BUG=492200
Change-Id: Ie1225a3960d49117b05eefa5a36263d8e556e467
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4981
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This implementation does not prompt for a password. It's just enough
to ensure that the many functions that take a tuple of
|pem_password_cb| and a |void *| to a password work in a reasonable
way when the latter is non-NULL.
Change-Id: Ic6bfc484630c67b5ede25277e14eb3b00c2024f0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4990
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The only flag is EVP_MD_CTX_FLAG_NO_INIT and no good can possibly come of
anyone outside EVP_PKEY_HMAC calling it. (And indeed no one calls it.
EVP_MD_CTX_set_flags has a caller in wpa_supplicant, but it uses
EVP_MD_CTX_FLAG_NON_FIPS_ALLOW which we don't define. The call is guarded by a
pair of ifdefs for some FIPS mode wpa_supplicant.)
Change-Id: I70ab8ffa646f3f75dfa4d37c96b9e82448ff1e40
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4971
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's never called externally and for good reason; the only flag to set is
EVP_MD_CTX_FLAG_NO_INIT which is an implementation detail of EVP_PKEY_HMAC
(hopefully to be removed eventually). Indeed, only EVP_PKEY_HMAC ever calls
this function. Except there's no need to because the HMAC_CTX has already been
initialized at that point. (And were it not initialized, that call would not
bode well for the poor HMAC_CTX.)
The legacy EVP_PKEY_HMAC API has test coverage and still works after this
change.
Change-Id: I2fb0bede3c24ad1519f9433f957606de15ba86c7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4970
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD table needs work, but this makes it clearer
exactly what the shared interface between the upper later and TLS/DTLS
is.
BUG=468889
Change-Id: I38931c484aa4ab3f77964d708d38bfd349fac293
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4955
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Enough code fails to check their return codes anyway. We ought to make
it official.
Change-Id: Ie646360fd7073ea943036f5e21bed13df7e1b77a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4954
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The SHA-2 family has some exceptions, but they're all programmer errors
and should be documented as such. (Are the failure cases even
necessary?)
Change-Id: I00bd0a9450cff78d8caac479817fbd8d3de872b8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4953
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These defines are part of the the locking callbacks which have been
removed. However, code that still tries to provide locking callbacks
will need these values to compile.
The locking callback that such code tries to install will be ignored,
but that's harmless since BoringSSL handles locking itself now.
Change-Id: Ic84da8b52020ccd3ecc8913b4e41d366690c7649
Android needs to be able to read a PKCS#7 blob from a Java
InputStream. This change adds |BIO_read_asn1| which reads a single
ASN.1 object from the start of a BIO without overreading.
Change-Id: I74776e686529c8e58af1c26a4909f9bd4e87b707
If BN_rand is called with |bits| set to 1 and |top| set to 1 then a 1 byte
buffer overflow can occur.
See also upstream's efee575ad464bfb60bf72dcb73f9b51768f4b1a1. But rather than
making |BN_rand| fail, be consistent with the |bits| = 0 case and just don't
set the bits that don't exist. Add tests to ensure the degenerate cases behave.
Change-Id: I5e9fbe6fd8f7f7b2e011a680f2fbe6d7ed4dab65
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4893
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The functions BN_rshift and BN_lshift shift their arguments to the right or
left by a specified number of bits. Unpredicatable results (including
crashes) can occur if a negative number is supplied for the shift value.
Thanks to Mateusz Kocielski (LogicalTrust), Marek Kroemeke and Filip Palian
for discovering and reporting this issue.
(Imported from upstream's 7cc18d8158b5fc2676393d99b51c30c135502107.)
Change-Id: Ib9f5e410a46df3d7f02a61374807fba209612bd3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4892
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is documented as "Only request a client certificate on the initial TLS/SSL
handshake. Do not ask for a client certificate again in case of a
renegotiation." Server-side renegotiation is gone.
I'm not sure this flag has ever worked anyway, dating all the way back to
SSLeay 0.8.1b. ssl_get_new_session overwrites s->session, so the old
session->peer is lost.
Change-Id: Ie173243e189c63272c368a55167b8596494fd59c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4883
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(obj_dat.h and obj_mac.h are generated from the objects.txt change.)
See upstream's 3c161d081e2d30549e787437d05ffa08122a5114. Also see upstream's
12048657a91b12e499d03ec9ff406b42aba67366 to give zlib a better comment.
Change-Id: I86937f037f8e0f6179ba8072ccd972eca773c7ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4882
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Never send the time as a client. Always send it as a server.
Change-Id: I20c55078cfe199d53dc002f6ee5dd57060b086d5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4829
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Yes, OpenSSL lets you randomly change its internal state. This is used
as part of server-side renegotiation. Server-side renegotiation is gone.
BUG=429450
Change-Id: Ic1b013705734357acf64e8bf89a051b2b7521c64
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4828
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's never called and the state is meaningless now.
Change-Id: I5429ec3eb7dc2b789c0584ea88323f0ff18920ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4826
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
When the peer or caller requests a renegotiation, OpenSSL doesn't
renegotiate immediately. It sets a flag to begin a renegotiation as soon
as record-layer read and write buffers are clear. One reason is that
OpenSSL's record layer cannot write a handshake record while an
application data record is being written. The buffer consistency checks
around partial writes will break.
None of these cases are relevant for the client auth hack. We already
require that renego come in at a quiescent part of the application
protocol by forbidding handshake/app_data interleave.
The new behavior is now: when a HelloRequest comes in, if the record
layer is not idle, the renegotiation is rejected as if
SSL_set_reject_peer_renegotiations were set. Otherwise we immediately
begin the new handshake. The server may not send any application data
between HelloRequest and completing the handshake. The HelloRequest may
not be consumed if an SSL_write is pending.
Note this does require that Chromium's HTTP stack not attempt to read
the HTTP response until the request has been written, but the
renegotiation logic already assumes it. Were Chromium to drive the
SSL_read state machine early and the server, say, sent a HelloRequest
after reading the request headers but before we've sent the whole POST
body, the SSL state machine may racily enter renegotiate early, block
writing the POST body on the new handshake, which would break Chromium's
ERR_SSL_CLIENT_AUTH_CERT_NEEDED plumbing.
BUG=429450
Change-Id: I6278240c3bceb5d2e1a2195bdb62dd9e0f4df718
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4825
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The only case where renego is supported is if we are a client and the
server sends a HelloRequest. That is still needed to support the renego
+ client auth hack in Chrome. Beyond that, no other forms of renego will
work.
The messy logic where the handshake loop is repurposed to send
HelloRequest and the extremely confusing tri-state s->renegotiate (which
makes SSL_renegotiate_pending a lie during the initial handshake as a
server) are now gone. The next change will further simplify things by
removing ssl->s3->renegotiate and the renego deferral logic. There's
also some server-only renegotiation checks that can go now.
Also clean up ssl3_read_bytes' HelloRequest handling. The old logic relied on
the handshake state machine to reject bad HelloRequests which... actually that
code probably lets you initiate renego by sending the first four bytes of a
ServerHello and expecting the peer to read it later.
BUG=429450
Change-Id: Ie0f87d0c2b94e13811fe8e22e810ab2ffc8efa6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4824
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
