Having |Z_is_one| be out of sync with |Z| could potentially be a very
bad thing, and in the past there have been multiple bugs of this sort,
including one currently in p256-x86_64.c (type confusion: Montgomery-
encoded vs unencoded). Avoid the issue entirely by getting rid of
|Z_is_one|.
Change-Id: Icb5aa0342df41d6bc443f15f952734295d0ee4ba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6576
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These are never called. Group parameters are not secret anyway. This is
a remnant of upstream's EC_GROUP_clear_free.
Change-Id: I23a4076eae8e4561abddbe74d0ba72641532f229
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6823
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
In some cases it would be good to restrict the input range of scalars
given to |EC_METHOD::mul| to be [0, order-1]. This is a first step
towards that goal.
Change-Id: I58a25db06f6c7a68a0ac1fe79794b04f7a173b23
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6562
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This moves us closer to having |EC_GROUP| and |EC_KEY| being immutable.
The functions are left as no-ops for backward compatibility.
Change-Id: Ie23921ab0364f0771c03aede37b064804c9f69e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6485
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If the application is only using the P-256 implementation in p256-64.c,
then the WNAF code would all be dead code. The change reorganizes the
code so that all modern toolchains should be able to recognize that
fact and eliminate the WNAF-based code when it is unused.
Change-Id: I9f94bd934ca7d2292de4c29bb89e17c940c7cd2a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6173
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
None of these methods vary per group. Factoring these out of
|EC_METHOD| should help some toolchains to do a better job optimizing
the code for size.
Change-Id: Ibd22a52992b4d549f12a8d22bddfdb3051aaa891
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6172
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Caught by malloc valgrind tests on Basic-Client-Sync. Also one by inspection
and verified with valgrind. Those should pass now with the exception of
CRYPTO_free_ex_data being internally implemented with malloc.
(Clearly we next should make our malloc tests assert that the containing
function fails to catch when we fail to check for some error and things
silently move one.)
Change-Id: I56c51dc8a32a7d3c7ac907d54015dc241728c761
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3440
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
