For TLS 1.3, we will need to process more complex post-handshake
messages. It is simplest if we use the same mechanism. In preparation,
allow ssl3_get_message to be called at any point.
Note that this stops reserving SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH in init_buf
right off the bat. Instead it will grow as-needed to accomodate the
handshake. SSL3_RT_MAX_PLAIN_LENGTH is rather larger than we probably
need to receive, particularly as a server, so this seems a good plan.
BUG=83
Change-Id: Id7f4024afc4c8a713b46b0d1625432315594350e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8985
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This API needs to be improved but, for the time being, keep the
invariant reasonable.
Change-Id: If94d41e7e7936e44de5ecb36da45f89f80df7784
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8984
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This adds the machinery for doing TLS 1.3 1RTT.
Change-Id: I736921ffe9dc6f6e64a08a836df6bb166d20f504
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8720
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is the equivalent of FragmentAcrossChangeCipherSuite for DTLS. It
is possible for us to, while receiving pre-CCS handshake messages, to
buffer up a message with sequence number meant for a post-CCS Finished.
When we then get to the new epoch and attempt to read the Finished, we
will process the buffered Finished although it was sent with the wrong
encryption.
Move ssl_set_{read,write}_state to SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD hooks as this is
a property of the transport. Notably, read_state may fail. In DTLS
check the handshake buffer size. We could place this check in
read_change_cipher_spec, but TLS 1.3 has no ChangeCipherSpec message, so
we will need to implement this at the cipher change point anyway. (For
now, there is only an assert on the TLS side. This will be replaced with
a proper check in TLS 1.3.)
Change-Id: Ia52b0b81e7db53e9ed2d4f6d334a1cce13e93297
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8790
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This machinery is so different between TLS and DTLS that there is no
sense in having them share structures. This switches us to maintaining
the full reassembled message in hm_fragment and get_message just lets
the caller read out of that when ready.
This removes the last direct handshake dependency on init_buf,
ssl3_hash_message.
Change-Id: I4eccfb6e6021116255daead5359a0aa3f4d5be7b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8667
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Both DTLS and TLS still use it, but that will change in the following
commit. This also removes the handshake's knowledge of the
dtls_clear_incoming_messages function.
(It's possible we'll want to get rid of begin_handshake in favor of
allocating it lazily depending on how TLS 1.3 post-handshake messages
end up working out. But this should work for now.)
Change-Id: I0f512788bbc330ab2c947890939c73e0a1aca18b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8666
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These are where the DTLS- and TLS-specific transport layer hooks will be
defined. Later we can probably move much of the implementations of these
hooks into these files so those functions can be static.
While I'm here, fix up the naming of some constants.
Change-Id: I1009dd9fdc3cc4fd49fbff0802f6289931abec3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8665
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
