NaCl defines _POSIX_C_SOURCE on the command line for some reason, thus
we have to be defensive about defining it.
Change-Id: Icbc8afcb1ac0e0ca23b788b11ea911c3f55a8b7f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1891
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
_BSD_SOURCE has been deprecated (see bug). The manpage for printf
suggests that any _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200112L is also sufficient to bring
in the needed declarations and the bug reporter confirms that it's
sufficient for him.
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=419859
Change-Id: Ifc053f11c5aa1df35aae8e952d2c73a7f4599ec2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1890
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Winsock needs to be initialized. Also, perror doesn't do anything
useful and read/recv aren't interchangeable.
Change-Id: Ic9dfd6907b7b0d396eafe72072a29d027b66bc0c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1871
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
close is closesocket. Also some of the headers are different
and inet_aton should be inet_pton.
Change-Id: I9eee0880d91833bdd3bcf0f2a352923c9fb1a891
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1864
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium does not like static initializers, and the CPU logic uses one to
initialize CPU bits. However, the crypto library lacks an explicit
initialization function, which could complicate (no compile-time errors)
porting existing code which uses crypto/, but not ssl/.
Add an explicit CRYPTO_library_init function, but make it a no-op by default.
It only does anything (and is required) if building with
BORINGSSL_NO_STATIC_INITIALIZER.
Change-Id: I6933bdc3447fb382b1f87c788e5b8142d6f3fe39
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1770
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Otherwise, in C, it becomes a K&R function declaration which doesn't actually
type-check the number of arguments.
Change-Id: I0731a9fefca46fb1c266bfb1c33d464cf451a22e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1582
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A single va_list may not be used twice. Nothing calls BIO_vprintf and it just
(v)snprintfs into a buffer anyway, so remove it. If it's actually needed, we
can fiddle with va_copy and the lack of it in C89 later, but anything that
actually cares can just assemble the output externally.
Add a test in bio_test.c.
BUG=399546
Change-Id: Ia40a68b31cb5984d817e9c55351f49d9d6c964c1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1391
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
