One of the codepaths didn't free the group. Found by libFuzzer.
BUG=chromium:603893
Change-Id: Icb81f2f89a8c1a52e29069321498986b193a0e56
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7685
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
As with SPKI parsers, the intent is make EVP_PKEY capture the key's
constraints in full fidelity, so we'd have to add new types or store the
information in the underlying key object if people introduce variant key
types with weird constraints on them.
Note that because PKCS#8 has a space for arbitrary attributes, this
parser must admit a hole. I'm assuming for now that we don't need an API
that enforces no attributes and just ignore trailing data in the
structure for simplicity.
BUG=499653
Change-Id: I6fc641355e87136c7220f5d7693566d1144a68e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6866
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Many consumers need SPKI support (X.509, TLS, QUIC, WebCrypto), each
with different ways to set signature parameters. SPKIs themselves can
get complex with id-RSASSA-PSS keys which come with various constraints
in the key parameters. This suggests we want a common in-library
representation of an SPKI.
This adds two new functions EVP_parse_public_key and
EVP_marshal_public_key which converts EVP_PKEY to and from SPKI and
implements X509_PUBKEY functions with them. EVP_PKEY seems to have been
intended to be able to express the supported SPKI types with
full-fidelity, so these APIs will continue this.
This means future support for id-RSASSA-PSS would *not* repurpose
EVP_PKEY_RSA. I'm worried about code assuming EVP_PKEY_RSA implies
acting on the RSA* is legal. Instead, it'd add an EVP_PKEY_RSA_PSS and
the data pointer would be some (exposed, so the caller may still check
key size, etc.) RSA_PSS_KEY struct. Internally, the EVP_PKEY_CTX
implementation would enforce the key constraints. If RSA_PSS_KEY would
later need its own API, that code would move there, but that seems
unlikely.
Ideally we'd have a 1:1 correspondence with key OID, although we may
have to fudge things if mistakes happen in standardization. (Whether or
not X.509 reuses id-ecPublicKey for Ed25519, we'll give it a separate
EVP_PKEY type.)
DSA parsing hooks are still implemented, missing parameters and all for
now. This isn't any worse than before.
Decoupling from the giant crypto/obj OID table will be a later task.
BUG=522228
Change-Id: I0e3964edf20cb795a18b0991d17e5ca8bce3e28c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6861
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is the first structure to be implemented with the new BIGNUM ASN.1
routines. Object reuse in the legacy d2i/i2d functions is implemented by
releasing whatever was in *out before and setting it to the
newly-allocated object. As with the new d2i_SSL_SESSION, this is a
weaker form of object reuse, but should suffice for reasonable callers.
As ECDSA_SIG is more likely to be parsed alone than as part of another
structure (and using CBB is slightly tedious), add convenient functions
which take byte arrays. For consistency with SSL_SESSION, they are named
to/from_bytes. from_bytes, unlike the CBS variant, rejects trailing
data.
Note this changes some test expectations: BER signatures now push an
error code. That they didn't do this was probably a mistake.
BUG=499653
Change-Id: I9ec74db53e70d9a989412cc9e2b599be0454caec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5269
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This imports the EVP_PKEY test data of upstream's evptests.txt, but
modified to fit our test framework and with a new test driver. The
remainder of the test data will be imported separately into aead_test
and cipher_test.
Some minor changes to the test format were made to account for test
framework differences. One test has different results since we don't
support RSA signatures with omitted (rather than NULL) parameters.
Otherwise, the biggest difference in test format is that the ad-hoc
result strings are replaced with checking ERR_peek_error.
Change-Id: I758869abbeb843f5f2ac6c1cbd87333baec08ec3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4703
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
