In c0d9484902, we had to add support for
recognizing specified versions of named curves. I believe the motivation
was an ECPrivateKey encoded by OpenSSL without the EC_KEY's asn1_flag
set to OPENSSL_EC_NAMED_CURVE. Annoyingly, it appears OpenSSL's API
defaulted to the specified form while the tool defaulted to the named
form.
Add tests for this at the ECPrivateKey and the PKCS#8 level. The latter
was taken from Chromium's ec_private_key_unittest.cc which was the
original impetus for this.
Change-Id: I53a80c842c3fc9598f2e0ee7bf2d86b2add9e6c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7072
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Since the error string logic was rewritten, this hasn't done anything.
Change-Id: Icb73dca65e852bb3c7d04c260d591906ec72c15f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6961
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is only for Conscrypt which always calls the pair in succession. (Indeed
it wouldn't make any sense to not call it.) Remove those two APIs and replace
with a single merged API. This way incomplete EC_GROUPs never escape outside
our API boundary and EC_GROUPs may *finally* be made immutable.
Also add a test for this to make sure I didn't mess it up.
Add a temporary BORINGSSL_201512 define to ease the transition for Conscrypt.
Conscrypt requires https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/187801/ before
picking up this change.
Change-Id: I3706c2ceac31ed2313175ba5ee724bd5c74ef6e1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6550
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium's toolchains may now assume C++11 library support, so we may freely
use C++11 features. (Chromium's still in the process of deciding what to allow,
but we use Google's style guide directly, toolchain limitations aside.)
Change-Id: I1c7feb92b7f5f51d9091a4c686649fb574ac138d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6465
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This removes a sharp corner in the API where |ECDH_compute_key| assumed
that callers were either using ephemeral keys, or else had already
checked that the public key was on the curve.
A public key that's not on the curve can be in a small subgroup and thus
the result can leak information about the private key.
This change causes |EC_POINT_set_affine_coordinates_GFp| to require that
points are on the curve. |EC_POINT_oct2point| already does this.
Change-Id: I77d10ce117b6efd87ebb4a631be3a9630f5e6636
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5861
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This isn't exhaustive. There are still failures in some tests which probably
ought to get C++'d first.
Change-Id: Iac58df9d98cdfd94603d54374a531b2559df64c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4795
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
MSVC seems to dislike the zero-array trick in C++, but not C. Turns out there
was no need for the include, so that's an easy fix.
Change-Id: I6def7b430a450c4ff7eeafa3611f0d40f5fc5945
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4580
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
RFC 5915 requires the use of the I2OSP primitive as defined in RFC 3447
for encoding ECPrivateKey. Fix this and add a test.
See also upstream's 30cd4ff294252c4b6a4b69cbef6a5b4117705d22, though it mixes
up degree and order.
Change-Id: I81ba14da3c8d69e3799422c669fab7f16956f322
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4469
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
