The handshake should be generic between TLS and DTLS.
Change-Id: I6feb2f013dd5d771f206750653ab9d117d7ea716
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21348
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
This frees us up to make SSL_CTX a C++ type and avoids a lot of
protrusions of otherwise private types into the global namespace.
Bug: 6
Change-Id: I8a0624a53a4d26ac4a483fa270c39ecdd07459ee
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21584
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
On some Chrome builds on Windows (including the official builds that we
ship) there are dynamic initializers for kNamedGroups in chrome.dll and
chrome_child.dll. Tagging this array with constexpr is guaranteed to
avoid this.
Bug: chromium:341941
Change-Id: I0e4ea0665b8ed9640b76b709dd300416be49e59e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21564
Reviewed-by: Bruce Dawson <brucedawson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This doesn't particularly matter but is more consistent with DTLS and
avoids the callback being potentially called from two places.
Change-Id: I2f57ca94d2d532c56f37a0bac7000c15b3b4b520
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21344
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
We usually use read/write rather than recv/send to describe the two
sides.
Change-Id: Ie3ac8c52c59ea9a5143f56b894f58cecd351dc7d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21304
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Clients need not accept CertificateRequest. We don't, have no intention
to, and post-handshake auth now requires an extension.
Change-Id: I2160c89e4a6988a7d743052b588d8aa2598ffabf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21305
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
The only difference is whether there's an alert to send back, but we'll
need to allow an "error without alert" in several cases anyway:
1. If the server sees an HTTP request or garbage instead of a
ClientHello, it shouldn't send an alert.
2. Resurfaced errors.
Just make zero signal no alert for now. Later on, I'm thinking we might
just want to put the alert into the outgoing buffer and make it further
uniform.
This also gives us only one error state to keep track of rather than
two.
Bug: 206
Change-Id: Ia821d9f89abd2ca6010e8851220d4e070bc42fa1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21286
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
This is analogous to the Go stack's handshakeErr field. Since it's quite
common for callers to run two I/O operations in parallel[*] like
SSL_read and SSL_write (or SSL_read and SSL_do_handshake for client
0-RTT). Accordingly, the new handshake state machine jams itself up on
handshake error, but to fully work with such callers, we should also
replay the error state.
This doesn't yet catch all cases (there are some parts of the read flow
which need to be fixed). Those will be resolved in later changes.
[*] Not actually in parallel, of course, but logically in parallel on a
non-blocking socket.
Bug: 206
Change-Id: I5a4d37a258b9e3fc555b732938b0528b839650f8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21285
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Thanks to Dimitar Vlahovski for pointing this out.
Change-Id: I417f52ec6c3e950bdab6079962b29976fb75c029
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21324
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I815f9fa77e08f72b0130ea9ef0dda751bf2ed7a6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20826
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I1d6cd1dd7470a3f64ec91b954042ed3f8c6b561e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20825
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
This roughly aligns with absl::Span<T>::subspan.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Iaf29418c1b10e2d357763dec90b6cb1371b86c3b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20824
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
Although we are derived from 1.0.2, we mimic 1.1.0 in some ways around
our FOO_up_ref functions and opaque libssl types. This causes some
difficulties when porting third-party code as any OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
checks for 1.1.0 APIs we have will be wrong.
Moreover, adding accessors without changing OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER can
break external projects. It is common to implement a compatibility
version of an accessor under #ifdef as a static function. This then
conflicts with our headers if we, unlike OpenSSL 1.0.2, have this
function.
This change switches OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER to 1.1.0 and atomically adds
enough accessors for software with 1.1.0 support already. The hope is
this will unblock hiding SSL_CTX and SSL_SESSION, which will be
especially useful with C++-ficiation. The cost is we will hit some
growing pains as more 1.1.0 consumers enter the ecosystem and we
converge on the right set of APIs to import from upstream.
It does not remove any 1.0.2 APIs, so we will not require that all
projects support 1.1.0. The exception is APIs which changed in 1.1.0 but
did not change the function signature. Those are breaking changes.
Specifically:
- SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb is now const-correct.
- X509_get0_signature is now const-correct.
For C++ consumers only, this change temporarily includes an overload
hack for SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb that keeps the old callback working.
This is a workaround for Node not yet supporting OpenSSL 1.1.0.
The version number is set at (the as yet unreleased) 1.1.0g to denote
that this change includes https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4384.
Bug: 91
Change-Id: I5eeb27448a6db4c25c244afac37f9604d9608a76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10340
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I was just passing by.
Change-Id: I0212b4a1a3fd2ad24d7157181cd55a92263a3727
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20904
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Querying versions is a bit of a mess between DTLS and TLS and variants
and friends. Add SSL_SESSION_is_single_use which informs the caller
whether the session should be single-use.
Bug: chromium:631988
Change-Id: I745d8a5dd5dc52008fe99930d81fed7651b92e4e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20844
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
SSL_CTX_sessions is the only think making us expose LHASH as public API
and nothing uses it. Nothing can use it anyway as it's not thread-safe.
I haven't actually removed it yet since SSL_CTX is public, but once the
types are opaque, we could trim the number of symbols ssl.h pulls in
with some work.
Relatedly, fix thread safety of SSL_CTX_sess_number.
Change-Id: I75a6c93509d462cd5ed3ce76c587f0d1e7cd0797
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20804
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The function has exactly one caller. Also add some comments.
Change-Id: I1566aed625449c91f25a777f5a4232d236019ed7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20673
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I710dbd4906bb7a8b971831be0121df5b78e4f9e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20672
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This adds a CBBFinishArray helper since we need to do that fairly often.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I7ec0720de0e6ea31caa90c316041bb5f66661cd3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20671
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This adds a CopyFrom companion to Init as a replacement for CBS_stow.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I4d77291b07552bd2286a09f8ba33655d6d97c853
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20670
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
They are exactly the same structure. Doing it in CBS allows us to switch
bssl::Span to absl::Span or a standard std::span in the future.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Ibc96673c23233d557a1dd4d8768d2659d7a4ca0c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20669
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
There seems to be a GCC bug that requires kDefaultGroups having an
explicit cast, but this is still much nicer than void(const uint16_t **,
size_t *) functions.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Id586d402ca0b8a01370353ff17295e71ee219ff3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20668
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
An Array<T> is an owning Span<T>. It's similar to absl::FixedArray<T>
but plays well with OPENSSL_malloc and doesn't implement inlining. With
OPENSSL_cleanse folded into OPENSSL_free, we could go nuts with
UniquePtr<uint8_t>, but having the pointer and length tied together is
nice for other reasons. Notably, Array<T> plays great with Span<T>.
Also switch the other parameter to a Span.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I4cdcf810cf2838208c8ba9fcc6215c1e369dffb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20667
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Rather than use those weird bitmasks, just pass an evp_aead_direction_t
and figure it out from there.
Change-Id: Ie52c6404bd0728d7d1ef964a3590d9ba0843c1d6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20666
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
draft-ietf-quic-tls needs access to the cipher's PRF hash to size its
keys correctly.
Change-Id: Ie4851f990e5e1be724f262f608f7195f7ca837ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20624
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Fixes failed compile with [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=], which is
default on gcc-7.x on distributions like fedora.
Enabling no implicit fallthrough for more than just clang as well to
catch this going forward.
Change-Id: I6cd880dac70ec126bd7812e2d9e5ff804d32cadd
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20564
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
base.h pulls in all the forward declarations, so this isn't needed. We
should also remove bio.h and buf.h, but cURL seems to depend on those.
Code search suggests this one is okay though.
case:yes content:\bHMAC content:openssl/ssl.h -content:openssl/hmac.h
Change-Id: Id91686bd134649245855025940bc17f82823c734
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20364
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Further testing suggests the behavior is slightly different than I
originally thought.
Change-Id: I3df6b3425dbb551e374159566ca969347d72a306
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20284
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The Java client implementation of the 3SHAKE mitigation incorrectly
rejects initial handshakes when all of the following are true:
1. The ClientHello offered a session.
2. The session was successfully resumed previously.
3. The server declines the session.
4. The server sends a certificate with a different SAN list than in the
previous session.
(Note the 3SHAKE mitigation is to reject certificates changes on
renegotiation, while Java's logic applies to initial handshakes as
well.)
The end result is long-lived Java clients break on some certificate
rotations. Fingerprint Java clients and decline all offered sessions.
This avoids (2) while still introducing new sessions to clear any
existing problematic sessions.
See also b/65323005.
Change-Id: Ib2b84c69b5ecba285ffb8c4d03de5626838d794e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20184
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Bug: 124
Change-Id: Iff02be9df2806572e6d3f860b448f598f85778c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20107
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
There's a lot of duplicated code between the two. This is in preparation
for adding two more of these fuzzers, this time for DTLS.
Bug: 124
Change-Id: I8ca2a02d599e2c88e30838d04b7cf07d4221aa76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20106
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
