This reverts the non-ARM portions of 97999919bb.
x86_64 perlasm already makes .globl imply .hidden. (Confusingly, ARM does not.)
Since we don't need it, revert those to minimize divergence with upstream.
Change-Id: I2d205cfb1183e65d4f18a62bde187d206b1a96de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3610
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
RC4_CHUNK is always defined, RC4_INT is always uint32_t and the
"register" keyword is an anachronism.
Change-Id: Ia752af30ba6bac0ee6216ce189fcf3888de73c6e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3544
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We are leaking asm symbols in Android builds because the asm code isn't
affected by -fvisibility=hidden. This change hides all asm symbols.
This assumes that no asm symbols are public API and that should be true.
Some points to note:
In crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-md5-x86_64.pl there are |RC4_set_key| and
|RC4_options| functions which aren't getting marked as hidden. That's
because those functions aren't actually ever generated. (I'm just trying
to minimise drift with upstream here.)
In crypto/rc4/asm/rc4-x86_64.pl there's |RC4_options| which is "public"
API, except that we've never had it in the header files. So I've just
deleted it. Since we have an internal caller, we'll probably have to put
it back in the future, but it can just be done in rc4.c to save
problems.
BUG=448386
Change-Id: I3846617a0e3d73ec9e5ec3638a53364adbbc6260
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3520
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This avoids unnecessary differences between LP64 and LLP64. Also
MSVC throws overflow warnings in the big-endian 64-bit codepath,
so use the preprocessor.
Change-Id: I74cef2d631d39f282177e043ed24bc6ecbbcb8fd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1860
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Now that symbol visibility is done correctly, this shouldn't be needed.
Change-Id: I608beed1de63c1309358ff17dd28e3191e87dbd4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1810
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Windows doesn't have ssize_t, sadly. There's SSIZE_T, but defining an
OPENSSL_SSIZE_T seems worse than just using an int.
Change-Id: I09bb5aa03f96da78b619e551f92ed52ce24d9f3f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1352
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change marks public symbols as dynamically exported. This means
that it becomes viable to build a shared library of libcrypto and libssl
with -fvisibility=hidden.
On Windows, one not only needs to mark functions for export in a
component, but also for import when using them from a different
component. Because of this we have to build with
|BORINGSSL_IMPLEMENTATION| defined when building the code. Other
components, when including our headers, won't have that defined and then
the |OPENSSL_EXPORT| tag becomes an import tag instead. See the #defines
in base.h
In the asm code, symbols are now hidden by default and those that need
to be exported are wrapped by a C function.
In order to support Chromium, a couple of libssl functions were moved to
ssl.h from ssl_locl.h: ssl_get_new_session and ssl_update_cache.
Change-Id: Ib4b76e2f1983ee066e7806c24721e8626d08a261
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1350
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, public headers lived next to the respective code and there
were symlinks from include/openssl to them.
This doesn't work on Windows.
This change moves the headers to live in include/openssl. In cases where
some symlinks pointed to the same header, I've added a file that just
includes the intended target. These cases are all for backwards-compat.
Change-Id: I6e285b74caf621c644b5168a4877db226b07fd92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1180
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change adds the stitched RC4-MD5 code from upstream OpenSSL but
exposes it as an AEAD. It's not a normal AEAD (it's stateful thus
doesn't take an nonce) but forcing pre-AEAD cipher suites in the AEAD
interface is less painful than forcing AEADs into the EVP_CIPHER
interface. Over time, more and more cipher suites will be exposed as
TLS-specific AEADs and then ssl/ can drop support for EVP_CIPHER.
See original code from upstream:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/crypto/evp/e_rc4_hmac_md5.c
Change-Id: Ia9267b224747f02be6b934ea0b2b50e1f529fab9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1043
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
