The Android SDK version against which Chromium builds is too old to
include sys/auxv.h. This change switches the ARM code to use a weak
pointer for getauxval and to hard code the aux value numbers.
It also switches the license on cpu-arm.c because there's no OpenSSL
left in there now.
Change-Id: I440cb9d533a06d8b245b189d8e5148fa33e29412
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2880
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is an initial cut at aarch64 support. I have only qemu to test it
however—hopefully hardware will be coming soon.
This also affects 32-bit ARM in that aarch64 chips can run 32-bit code
and we would like to be able to take advantage of the crypto operations
even in 32-bit mode. AES and GHASH should Just Work in this case: the
-armx.pl files can be built for either 32- or 64-bit mode based on the
flavour argument given to the Perl script.
SHA-1 and SHA-256 don't work like this however because they've never
support for multiple implementations, thus BoringSSL built for 32-bit
won't use the SHA instructions on an aarch64 chip.
No dedicated ChaCha20 or Poly1305 support yet.
Change-Id: Ib275bc4894a365c8ec7c42f4e91af6dba3bd686c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2801
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Otherwise, in C, it becomes a K&R function declaration which doesn't actually
type-check the number of arguments.
Change-Id: I0731a9fefca46fb1c266bfb1c33d464cf451a22e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1582
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some phones have a buggy NEON unit and the Poly1305 NEON code fails on
them, even though other NEON code appears to work fine.
This change:
1) Fixes a bug where NEON was assumed even when the code wasn't compiled
in NEON mode.
2) Adds a second NEON control bit that can be disabled in order to run
NEON code, but not the Poly1305 NEON code.
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=341598
Change-Id: Icb121bf8dba47c7a46c7667f676ff7a4bc973625
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1351
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
