These were added in OpenSSL 1.1.0.
Change-Id: I261e0e0ccf82544883c4a2ef5c5dc4a651c0c756
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28329
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
PyOpenSSL calls this function these days. Tested by roundtripping with
ourselves and also manually confirming our output interoperates with
OpenSSL. (For anyone repeating this experiment, the OpenSSL
command-line tool has a bug and does not correctly output friendlyName
attributes with non-ASCII characters. I'll send them a PR to fix this
shortly.)
Between this and the UTF-8 logic earlier, the theme of this patch series
seems to be "implement in C something I last implemented in
JavaScript"...
Change-Id: I258d563498d82998c6bffc6789efeaba36fe3a5e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28328
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is not very useful without PKCS12_create, which a follow-up change
will implement.
Change-Id: I355ccd22a165830911ae189871ab90a6101f42ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28327
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This aligns with OpenSSL 1.1.0's behavior, which deviated from OpenSSL
1.0.2. OpenSSL 1.0.2 effectively assumed input passwords were always
Latin-1.
Update-Note: If anyone was using PKCS#12 passwords with non-ASCII
characters, this changes them from being encoding-confused to hopefully
interpretting "correctly". If this breaks anything, we can add a
fallback to PKCS12_get_key_and_certs/PKCS12_parse, but OpenSSL 1.1.0
does not have such behavior. It only implements a fallback in the
command-line tool, not the APIs.
Change-Id: I0aa92db26077b07a40f85b89f4d3e0f6b0d7be87
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28326
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Update-Note: This changes causes BoringSSL to be stricter about handling
Unicode strings:
· Reject code points outside of Unicode
· Reject surrogate values
· Don't allow invalid UTF-8 to pass through when the source claims to
be UTF-8 already.
· Drop byte-order marks.
Previously, for example, a UniversalString could contain a large-valued
code point that would cause the UTF-8 encoder to emit invalid UTF-8.
Change-Id: I94d9db7796b70491b04494be84249907ff8fb46c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28325
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Build (and carry) issues are now resolved (as far as we know). Let's try
this again...
Measurements on a Skylake VM (so a little noisy).
Before:
Did 3135 RSA 2048 signing operations in 3015866us (1039.5 ops/sec)
Did 89000 RSA 2048 verify (same key) operations in 3007271us (29594.9 ops/sec)
Did 66000 RSA 2048 verify (fresh key) operations in 3014363us (21895.2 ops/sec)
Did 324 RSA 4096 signing operations in 3004364us (107.8 ops/sec)
Did 23126 RSA 4096 verify (same key) operations in 3003398us (7699.9 ops/sec)
Did 21312 RSA 4096 verify (fresh key) operations in 3017043us (7063.9 ops/sec)
Did 31040 ECDH P-256 operations in 3024273us (10263.6 ops/sec)
Did 91000 ECDSA P-256 signing operations in 3019740us (30135.0 ops/sec)
Did 25678 ECDSA P-256 verify operations in 3046975us (8427.4 ops/sec)
After:
Did 3640 RSA 2048 signing operations in 3035845us (1199.0 ops/sec)
Did 129000 RSA 2048 verify (same key) operations in 3003691us (42947.2 ops/sec)
Did 105000 RSA 2048 verify (fresh key) operations in 3029935us (34654.2 ops/sec)
Did 510 RSA 4096 signing operations in 3014096us (169.2 ops/sec)
Did 38000 RSA 4096 verify (same key) operations in 3092814us (12286.5 ops/sec)
Did 34221 RSA 4096 verify (fresh key) operations in 3003817us (11392.5 ops/sec)
Did 38000 ECDH P-256 operations in 3061758us (12411.2 ops/sec)
Did 116000 ECDSA P-256 signing operations in 3001637us (38645.6 ops/sec)
Did 35100 ECDSA P-256 verify operations in 3023872us (11607.6 ops/sec)
Tested with Intel SDE.
Change-Id: Ib27c0d6012d14274e331ab03f958e5a0c8b7e885
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28104
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These will be used for the PKCS#12 code and to replace some of the
crypto/asn1 logic. So far they support the ones implemented by
crypto/asn1, which are Latin-1, UCS-2 (ASN.1 BMPStrings can't go beyond
the BMP), UTF-32 (ASN.1 UniversalString) and UTF-8.
Change-Id: I3d5c0d964cc6f97c3a0a1e352c9dd7d8cc0d87f2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28324
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Broke Aarch64 on the main builders (but not the trybots, somehow.)
Change-Id: I53eb09c99ef42a59628b0506b5ddb125299b554a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28364
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Callers should not mutate these.
Update-Note: I believe I've fixed up everything. If I missed one, the
fix should be straightforward.
Change-Id: Ifbce4961204822f57502a0de33aaa5a2a08b026d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28266
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
This also happens to make the AES_[en|de]crypt functions use AES-NI
(where available) on Intel.
Update-Note: this substantially changes how AES-NI is triggered. Worth running bssl speed (on both k8 and ppc), before and after, to confirm that there are no regressions.
Change-Id: I5f22c1975236bbc1633c24ab60d683bca8ddd4c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28026
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Update-Note: Enabling TLS 1.3 now enables both draft-23 and draft-28
by default, in preparation for cycling all to draft-28.
Change-Id: I9405f39081f2e5f7049aaae8a9c85399f21df047
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28304
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I added the flag but forgot to do anything with it.
Change-Id: I5ad7e1ceed7eca60a3a096c079092ae30b2becbe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28305
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Hopefully this is the last of it before we can hide the struct. We're
missing peer_sha256 accessors, and some test wants to mutate the ticket
in a test client.
Change-Id: I1a30fcc0a1e866d42acbc07a776014c9257f7c86
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28268
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
gRPC builds on Debian Jessie, which has GCC 4.9.2, and builds with
-Wtype-limits, which makes it warn about code intended for 64-bit
systems when building on 32-bit systems.
We have tried to avoid these issues with Clang previously by guarding
with “sizeof(size_t) > 4”, but this version of GCC isn't smart enough to
figure that out.
Change-Id: I800ceb3891436fa7c81474ede4b8656021568357
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28247
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This was all new code. There was a request to make this available under
ISC.
Change-Id: Ibabbe6fbf593c2a781aac47a4de7ac378604dbcf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28267
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ib12f41dec023e20dfd1182513bf11571950d7c85
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28245
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This happened to be working only because of lucky -I argument and At the
same time, include digest.h since this file references |EVP_sha1| and
other digest-related functions.
Change-Id: I0095ea8f5ef21f6e63b3dc819932b38178e09693
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28244
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Some third-party projects include it for some inexplicable reason.
Change-Id: I57c406d77d82a4a9ba6b54519023f2b02f2eb5e2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28225
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I missed the return value of operator=.
Change-Id: Ic8d6ec8feb47e922be56f5fba7aff019c322d6fa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28190
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
On Windows, just switching the socket to blocking doesn't work. Instead,
switch the stdin half of the waiter to waiting for either socket write
or stdin read, depending on whether we're in the middle of trying to
write a buffer.
Change-Id: I81414898f0491e78e6ab5b28c12148a3909ec1e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28167
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We forgot to do this in our original implementation on general ecosystem
grounds. It's also mandated starting draft-26.
Just to avoid unnecessary turbulence, since draft-23 is doomed to die
anyway, condition this on our draft-28 implementation. (We don't support
24 through 27.)
We'd actually checked this already on the Go side, but the spec wants a
different alert.
Change-Id: I0014cda03d7129df0b48de077e45f8ae9fd16976
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28124
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
If the peer sends us one record that exceeds buffer, the socket will no
longer flag as readable, because data has been consumed, but SSL_read
should still be called to drain data. bssl would instead not notice and
only surface the data later on.
This can (currently) be reproduced by sending "HEAD / HTTP/1.1" to
www.google.com.
Change-Id: I73cdbe104ba6be56fc033429999e630f0eb852d8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28166
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
While |WaitForMultipleObjects| works for both sockets and stdin, the
latter is often a line-buffered console. The |HANDLE| is considered
readable if there are any console events available, but reading blocks
until a full line is available. (In POSIX, line buffering is implemented
in the kernel via termios, which is differently concerning, but does
mean |select| works as expected.)
So that |Wait| reflects final stdin read, we spawn a stdin reader thread
that writes to an in-memory buffer and signals a |WSAEVENT| to
coordinate with the socket. This is kind of silly, but it works.
I tried just writing it to a pipe, but it appears
|WaitForMultipleObjects| does not work on pipes!
Change-Id: I2bfa323fa91aad7d2035bb1fe86ee6f54b85d811
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28165
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
bcm.c means e_aes.c can no longer be lazy about warning push/pop.
Change-Id: I558041bab3baa00e3adc628fe19486545d0f6be3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28164
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Make it clear this is not a pristine full copy of all of Wycheproof as a
library.
Change-Id: I1aa5253a1d7c696e69b2e8d7897924f15303d9ac
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28188
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
They were flaky half a year ago, but maybe infra has fixed whatever the
issue was. We're on a different swarming pool now.
Change-Id: I6e9faa3e84d373a650ad67915ce93b293a968da8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28187
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Rather than printing the SSL_ERROR_* constants, print the actual error.
This should be a bit more understandable. Debugging this also uncovered
some other issues on Windows:
- We were mixing up C runtime and Winsock errors, which are separate in
Windows.
- The thread local implementation interferes with WSAGetLastError due to
a quirk of TlsGetValue. This could affect other Windows consumers.
(Chromium uses a custom BIO, so it isn't affected.)
- SocketSetNonBlocking also interferes with WSAGetLastError.
- Listen for FD_CLOSE along with FD_READ. Connection close does not
signal FD_READ. (The select loop only barely works on Windows anyway
due to issues with stdin and line buffering, but if we take stdin out
of the equation, FD_CLOSE can be tested.)
Change-Id: Ia8d42b5ac39ebb3045d410dd768f83a3bb88b2cb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28186
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Rather than printing the SSL_ERROR_* constants, print the actual error.
This should be a bit more understandable. Debugging this also uncovered
some other issues on Windows:
- We were mixing up C runtime and Winsock errors, which are separate in
Windows.
- The thread local implementation interferes with WSAGetLastError due to
a quirk of TlsGetValue. This could affect other Windows consumers.
(Chromium uses a custom BIO, so it isn't affected.)
- SocketSetNonBlocking also interferes with WSAGetLastError.
- Listen for FD_CLOSE along with FD_READ. Connection close does not
signal FD_READ. (The select loop only barely works on Windows anyway
due to issues with stdin and line buffering, but if we take stdin out
of the equation, FD_CLOSE can be tested.)
Change-Id: If991259915acc96606a314fbe795fe6ea1e295e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28125
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is done by adding two new tagged data types to the shim's
transcript: one for the serialized handoff, and another for the
serialized handback.
Then, the handshake driver in |TLSFuzzer| is modified to be able to
drive a handoff+handback sequence in the same way as was done for
testing: by swapping |BIO|s into additional |SSL| objects. (If a
particular transcript does not contain a serialized handoff, this is a
no-op.)
Change-Id: Iab23e4dc27959ffd3d444adc41d40a4274e83653
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27204
Commit-Queue: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Found by fuzzing.
Change-Id: I831f7869b16486eef7ac887ee199450e38461086
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28044
Commit-Queue: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Along the way, check the version against the cipher to make sure the
combination is possible.
(Found by fuzzing: a bad version trips an assert.)
Change-Id: Ib0a284fd5fd9b7ba5ceba63aa6224966282a2cb7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27265
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 7e6c0f56e65af0727d87615342df1272cd017e9f)
Change-Id: I1d060055c923f78311265510a3fbe17a34ecc1d4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28084
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The bug, courtesy of Wycheproof, is that AES key wrap requires the input
be at least two blocks, not one. This also matches the OpenSSL behavior
of those two APIs.
Update-Note: AES_wrap_key with in_len = 8 and AES_unwrap_key with
in_len = 16 will no longer work.
Change-Id: I5fc63ebc16920c2f9fd488afe8c544e0647d7507
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27925
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I0674f4e9b15b546237600fb2486c46aac7cb0716
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28027
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Montgomery multiplication post-conditions in some of code paths were
formally non-constant time. Cache access pattern was result-neutral,
but a little bit asymmetric, which might have produced a signal [if
processor reordered load and stores at run-time].
(Imported from upstream's 774ff8fed67e19d4f5f0df2f59050f2737abab2a.)
Change-Id: I77443fb79242b77e704c34d69f1de9e3162e9538
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27987
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(It complains that the comparison is always false with NDK r17 beta 2.)
Change-Id: I6b695fd0e86047f0c1e4267290e63db3184a958a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28025
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
|set| should be evaluated to determine whether to insert/append before
it is reused as a temporary variable.
When incrementing the |set| of X509_NAME_ENTRY, the inserted entry
should not be incremented.
Thanks to Ingo Schwarze for extensive debugging and the initial
fix.
(Imported from upstream bbf27cd58337116c57a1c942153330ff83d5540a)
Change-Id: Ib45d92fc6d52d7490b01d3c475eafc42dd6ef721
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28005
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We've never defined this so this code has always been dead.
Change-Id: Ibcc4095bf812c7e1866c5f39968789606f0995ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28024
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27944 inadvertently caused
SHA256 and SHA384 aliases to be rejected in
SSL_CTX_set_strict_cipher_list. While this is the desired end state, in
case the removal needs to be reverted, we should probably defer this to
post-removal cleanup.
Otherwise we might update someone's "ALL:!SHA256" cipher string to
account for the removal, and then revert the removal underneath them.
Change-Id: Id516a27a2ecefb5871485d0ae18067b5bbb536bb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28004
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
