Imported from patch attached to
https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4439.
But with the extra vs $extra typo fixed.
The root problem appears to be that lazy_reduction tries to use paddd instead
of paddq when they believe the sum will not overflow a u32. In the final call
to lazy_reduction, this is not true. svaldez and I attempted to work through
the bounds, but the bounds derived from the cited paper imply paddd is always
fine. Empirically in a debugger, the bounds are exceeded in the test case.
I requested more comments from upstream on the bug. When upstream lands their
final fix (hopefully with comments), I will update this code. In the meantime,
let's stop carrying known-broken stuff.
(vlazy_reduction is probably something similar, but since we don't enable that
code, we haven't bothered analyzing it.)
Also add the smaller of the two test cases that catch the bug. (The other uses
an update pattern which isn't quite what poly1305_test does.)
Change-Id: I446ed47c21f10b41a0745de96ab119a3f6fd7801
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7544
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
OpenSSL upstream's SIMD assembly is rather complex. This pattern of update
calls should be sufficient to stress all the codepaths.
Change-Id: I50dea8351e4203b6b2cd9b23456eb4a592d31b5e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7223
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change fixes up several comments (many of which were spotted by
Kenny Root) and also changes doc.go to detect cases where comments don't
start with the correct word. (This is a common error.)
Since we have docs builders now, these errors will be found
automatically in the future.
Change-Id: I58c6dd4266bf3bd4ec748763c8762b1a67ae5ab3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6440
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
RFC 7359 includes tests for various edge cases. Also, as
CRYPTO_poly1305_update can be used single-shot and streaming, we should
explicitly stress both.
Change-Id: Ie44c203a77624be10397ad05f06ca98d937db76f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5410
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
