While a fairly small hook, open_close_notify is pretty weird. It
processes things at the record level and not above. Notably, this will
break if it skips past a TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate.
Instead, it can share the core part of SSL_read/SSL_peek, with slight
tweaks to post-handshake processing. Note this does require some tweaks
to that code. Notably, to retain the current semantics that SSL_shutdown
does not call funny callbacks, we suppress tickets.
Change-Id: Ia0cbd0b9f4527f1b091dd2083a5d8c7efb2bac65
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21885
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Ideally we'd put this deep in the record layer, but sending alerts
currently awkwardly sets the field early, so we can't quite lock it out
this deep down.
This is mostly a sanity-check, but a later CL will fix SSL_shutdown's
post-handshake message processing, so this will help catch errors there.
Change-Id: I78e627c19547dbcdc85fb168795240d692baf031
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21884
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
This gets us closer to exposing BIO-free APIs. The next step is probably
to make the experimental bssl::OpenRecord function call a split out core
of ssl_read_impl.
Change-Id: I4acebb43f708df8c52eb4e328da8ae3551362fb9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21865
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
We'll probably want to either move or add additional checks later, but
meanwhile this gets more code on the BIO-free side of the divide.
Change-Id: I3e2b570cdf1d70a262d952c20fd2d76ff4f70dd0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21365
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Ultimately the ssl_buffer_* code will be above SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD, so
having the processing be analogous is simpler. This also means that DTLS
can surface errors out of dtls_open_record without the caller reading an
extra record.
Bug: 206
Change-Id: Ic1cb3a884763c8e875e1129b1cda226f72bc95b7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21364
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
We only support non-blocking BIOs for DTLS as of
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13945. This logic is a remnant
of that. It should not be necessary. All users of DTLSv1_get_timeout
call DTLSv1_handle_timeout. This gets it out of the way for
dtls_open_record calls which don't use dtls1_get_record.
We can restore it elsewhere if necessary, but I don't think we need it.
Change-Id: Idb737868358e4b59ad3cb2c994c7084ffcdb3709
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21349
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
These are common between TLS and DTLS so should not have the ssl3_
prefix. (TLS-only stuff should really have a tls_ prefix, but we still
have a lot of that one.)
This also fixes a stray reference to ssl3_send_client_key_exchange..
Change-Id: Ia05b360aa090ab3b5f075d5f80f133cbfe0520d4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21346
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
We usually use read/write rather than recv/send to describe the two
sides.
Change-Id: Ie3ac8c52c59ea9a5143f56b894f58cecd351dc7d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21304
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
The only difference is whether there's an alert to send back, but we'll
need to allow an "error without alert" in several cases anyway:
1. If the server sees an HTTP request or garbage instead of a
ClientHello, it shouldn't send an alert.
2. Resurfaced errors.
Just make zero signal no alert for now. Later on, I'm thinking we might
just want to put the alert into the outgoing buffer and make it further
uniform.
This also gives us only one error state to keep track of rather than
two.
Bug: 206
Change-Id: Ia821d9f89abd2ca6010e8851220d4e070bc42fa1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21286
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
That's the last of it!
Change-Id: I93d1f5ab7e95b2ad105c34b24297a0bf77625263
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19784
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Instead, the DTLS driver can detect these states implicitly based on
when we write flights and when the handshake completes. When we flush a
new flight, the peer has enough information to send their reply, so we
start a timer. When we begin assembling a new flight, we must have
received the final message in the peer's flight. (If there are
asynchronous events between, we may stop the timer later, but we may
freely stop the timer anytime before we next try to read something.)
The only place this fails is if we were the last to write a flight,
we'll have a stray timer. Clear it in a handshake completion hook.
Change-Id: I973c592ee5721192949a45c259b93192fa309edb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18864
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This would only come up if the peer didn't pack records together, but
it's free to handle. Notably OpenSSL has a bug where it does not pack
retransmits together.
Change-Id: I0927d768f6b50c62bacdd82bd1c95396ed503cf3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18724
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The previous attempt around the 'struct ssl_st' compatibility mess
offended OSS-Fuzz and UBSan because one compilation unit passed a
function pointer with ssl_st* and another called it with
bssl::SSLConnection*.
Linkers don't retain such types, of course, but to silence this alert,
instead make C-visible types be separate from the implementation and
subclass the public type. This does mean we risk polluting the symbol
namespace, but hopefully the compiler is smart enough to inline the
visible struct's constructor and destructor.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Ia75a89b3a22a202883ad671a630b72d0aeef680e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18224
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
This is horrible, but everything else I tried was worse. The goal with
this CL is to take the extern "C" out of ssl/internal.h and move most
symbols to namespace bssl, so we can start using C++ helpers and
destructors without worry.
Complications:
- Public API functions must be extern "C" and match their declaration in
ssl.h, which is unnamespaced. C++ really does not want you to
interleave namespaced and unnamespaced things. One can actually write
a namespaced extern "C" function, but this means, from C++'s
perspective, the function is namespaced. Trying to namespace the
public header would worked but ended up too deep a rabbithole.
- Our STACK_OF macros do not work right in namespaces.
- The typedefs for our exposed but opaque types are visible in the
header files and copied into consuming projects as forward
declarations. We ultimately want to give SSL a destructor, but
clobbering an unnamespaced ssl_st::~ssl_st seems bad manners.
- MSVC complains about ambiguous names if one typedefs SSL to bssl::SSL.
This CL opts for:
- ssl/*.cc must begin with #define BORINGSSL_INTERNAL_CXX_TYPES. This
informs the public headers to create forward declarations which are
compatible with our namespaces.
- For now, C++-defined type FOO ends up at bssl::FOO with a typedef
outside. Later I imagine we'll rename many of them.
- Internal functions get namespace bssl, so we stop worrying about
stomping the tls1_prf symbol. Exported C functions are stuck as they
are. Rather than try anything weird, bite the bullet and reorder files
which have a mix of public and private functions. I expect that over
time, the public functions will become fairly small as we move logic
to more idiomatic C++.
Files without any public C functions can just be written normally.
- To avoid MSVC troubles, some bssl types are renamed to CPlusPlusStyle
in advance of them being made idiomatic C++.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Ic931895e117c38b14ff8d6e5a273e868796c7581
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18124
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/242/631/382.gif
In the first step, switch C files to C++ individually, keeping
everything in internal.h C-compatible. We'll make minimal changes needed
to get things compiling (notably a lot of goto errs will need to turn to
bssl::UniquePtr right away), but more aggressive changes will happen in
later steps.
(To avoid a rebase, I'm intentionally avoiding files that would conflict
with CLs in flight right now.)
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Id4cfd722e7b57d1df11f27236b4658b5d39b5fd2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17667
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
