I always forget these.

Change-Id: I74fd97b1142a8db7419d3906aab2dbc2fd3f94cb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14706
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Change-Id: I62a14a52237cbcb1706df6ab63014370d9228be1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13946
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

I always forget to update this when we add new certs.

Change-Id: Ib5ceeddd70934cfa763a80a3ed92b22d37be8726
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12262
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

We managed to mix two comment styles in the Go license headers and
copy-and-paste it throughout the project.

Change-Id: Iec1611002a795368b478e1cae0b53127782210b1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9060
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

RSASSA-PSS with SHA-512 is slightly too large for 1024-bit RSA. One
should not be using 1024-bit RSA, but it's common enough for tests
(including our own in runner before they were regenerated), that we
should probably do the size check and avoid unnecessary turbulence to
everyone else's test setups.

Change-Id: If0c7e401d7d05404755cba4cbff76de3bc65c138
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8746
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Change-Id: I6741f374dc69e8d4dd3977f607c3c5688eeabfd7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8744
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

adb kindly doesn't forward exit codes until N
(https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=3254), so we need to work
around it. Otherwise all our test failures have been silently ignored (oops!).

Change-Id: I03440db7dd77e6b9af5445b309b67dc719cea054
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8190
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

The recipes need to run with a funny GOROOT and we were clearing the
environment.

BUG=26

Change-Id: If233a16e060533ad3fa6f215ce596456c2d7afa5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7988
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This will let the recipes use the copy pulled from Chromium's android_tools.

BUG=26

Change-Id: Ica6519223b9fb6daef30f3e14c72ef6422de0f6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7982
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Allow running only one of the test suites. The recipe expects these happen in
two separate steps (it wants only one JSON results file per "step"). Also add
an option to extract the results file.

BUG=26

Change-Id: I0cda19bd9643b66f40a30bc8410a357da33baacc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7945
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Change-Id: Ifd60964e4074fa7900e9ebfbb669864bae0821dd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7729
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

The bots will likely use different infrastructure (I expect I'll need to write
an isolate file and such). In the meantime, make it easier to run tests
manually.

BUG=487432

Change-Id: I0e10b23e5f3eb1c5cd60fb88f21ba4a8385b979e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7334
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>