Amazingly, this function actually has (not crypto-related) callers, despite
being pretty much useless for cryptography.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I440827380995695c7a15bbf2220a05ffb28d9335
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8594
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These were generated by running test_mod_exp_mont5 10 times. The values with
Montgomery representation 1 were generated separately so the test file could
preserve the comment. (Though, at 10,000 lines, no one's going to find it...)
BUG=31
Change-Id: I8e9d4d6d7b5f7d283bd259df10a1dbdc90b888cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8611
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Honestly, with this size of number, they're pretty bad test vectors.
test_mod_exp_mont5 will be imported in the next commit which should help.
This was done by taking test_mod_exp's generation, running it a few times
(since otherwise the modulus is always the same). I also ran it a few times
with the odd constraint removed since BN_mod_exp is supposed to support it,
even if it's not actually useful.
BUG=31
Change-Id: Id53953f0544123a5ea71efac534946055dd5aabc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8610
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
That one needs reduced inputs and the other ought to be also tested against
unreduced ones is a bit annoying. But the previous commit made sure BN_nnmod
has tests, and test_mont could stand to inherit test_mod_mul's test data (it
only had five tests originally!), so I merged them.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I1eb585b14f85f0ea01ee81537a01e07ced9f5d9a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8608
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
In preparation for converting test_mont and test_mod_mul to test vectors, make
test_mont less silly. We can certainly get away with doing more than five
tests. Also generate |a| and |b| anew each time. Otherwise the first BN_nmod is
destructive.
Change-Id: I944007ed7b6013a16d972cb7290ab9992c9360ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8605
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
No need for the special case and such.
Change-Id: If8fbc73eda0ccbaf3fd422e97c96fee6dc10b1ab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8604
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Also, update the documentation about aliasing for |BN_usub|. It might
be better to find a way to factor out the shared logic between the
tests of these functions and the tests of |BN_add| and |BN_usub|, but
doing so would end up up creating a lot of parameters due to the many
distinct strings used in the messages.
Change-Id: Ic9d714858212fc92aa6bbcc3959576fe6bbf58c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8593
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Also update the documentation for |BN_sub|.
Change-Id: I544dbfc56f22844f6ca08e9e472ec13e76baf8c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8592
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
|BN_mod_exp_mont| should be tested the same way as the other variants,
especially since it is exported.
Change-Id: I8c05725289c0ebcce7aba7e666915c4c1a841c2b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8590
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The bc ones will all get replaced later.
Change-Id: Ic1c6ee320b3a5689c7dadea3f483bd92f7e39612
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8528
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These can all share one test type. Note test_div had a separate
division by zero test which had to be extracted.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I1de0220fba78cd7f82a5dc96adb34b79c07929e9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8527
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
crypto/bn/bn_test.cc:404:44: error: ‘n’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
Change-Id: Id590dfee4b9ae1a4fbd0965e133310dac0d06ed3
Two of these were even regression tests for a past bug. These are also
moved to the file, now with the amazing innovation that we *actually
check the regression test gave the right answer*.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I8097336ad39a2bb5c0af07dd8e1e34723b68d182
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8525
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This took some finesse. I merged the lshift1 and rshift1 test vectors as
one counted down and the other up. The rshift1 vectors were all rounded
to even numbers, with the test handling the odd case. Finally, each run
only tested positive or negative (it wasn't re-randomized), so I added
both positive and negative versions of each test vector.
BUG=31
Change-Id: Ic7de45ab797074547c44c2e4ff8089b1feec5d57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8522
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Test vectors taken from one run of bc_test with the -bc flag, along with
a handful of manual test vectors around numbers close to zero. (The
output was compared against bc to make sure it was correct.)
BUG=31
Change-Id: I9e9263ece64a877c8497716cd4713b4c3e44248c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8521
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
As of 67cb49d045 and the corresponding upstream
change, BN_mod_word may fail, like BN_div_word. Handle this properly and
document in bn.h. Thanks to Brian Smith for pointing this out.
Change-Id: I6d4f32dc37bcabf70847c9a8b417d55d31b3a380
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8491
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
On systems where we do not have BN_ULLONG (notably Win64), BN_mod_word() can
return incorrect results if the supplied modulus is too big.
(Imported from upstream's e82fd1b4574c8908b2c3bb68e1237f057a981820 and
e4c4b2766bb97b34ea3479252276ab7c66311809.)
Change-Id: Icee8a7c5c67a8ee14c276097f43a7c491e68c2f9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8233
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change acb24518 renamed some functions, but there were some dangling
references in bn_test.c. Thanks to Brian Smith for noticing.
This change has no semantic effect.
Change-Id: Id149505090566583834be3abce2cee28b8c248e2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7040
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
There's many ways to serialize a BIGNUM, so not including asn1 in the name is
confusing (and collides with BN_bn2cbb_padded). Since BN_asn12bn looks
ridiculous, match the parse/marshal naming scheme of other modules instead.
Change-Id: I53d22ae0537a98e223ed943e943c48cb0743cf51
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6822
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit 2b0180c37fa6ffc48ee40caa831ca398b828e680 attempted to do this but
only hit one of many BN_mod_exp codepaths. Fix remaining variants and
add a test for each method.
Thanks to Hanno Boeck for reporting this issue.
(Imported from upstream's 44e4f5b04b43054571e278381662cebd3f3555e6.)
Change-Id: Ic691b354101c3e9c3565300836fb6d55c6f253ba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6820
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium's toolchains may now assume C++11 library support, so we may freely
use C++11 features. (Chromium's still in the process of deciding what to allow,
but we use Google's style guide directly, toolchain limitations aside.)
Change-Id: I1c7feb92b7f5f51d9091a4c686649fb574ac138d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6465
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Not content with signing negative RSA moduli, still other Estonian IDs have too
many leading zeros. Work around those too.
This workaround will be removed in six months.
BUG=534766
Change-Id: Ica23b1b1499f9dbe39e94cf7b540900860e8e135
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5980
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Estonian IDs issued between September 2014 to September 2015 are broken and use
negative moduli. They last five years and are common enough that we need to
work around this bug.
Add parallel "buggy" versions of BN_cbs2unsigned and RSA_parse_public_key which
tolerate this mistake, to align with OpenSSL's previous behavior. This code is
currently hooked up to rsa_pub_decode in RSA_ASN1_METHOD so that d2i_X509 is
tolerant. (This isn't a huge deal as the rest of that stack still uses the
legacy ASN.1 code which is overly lenient in many other ways.)
In future, when Chromium isn't using crypto/x509 and has more unified
certificate handling code, we can put client certificates under a slightly
different codepath, so this needn't hold for all certificates forever. Then in
September 2019, when the broken Estonian certificates all expire, we can purge
this codepath altogether.
BUG=532048
Change-Id: Iadb245048c71dba2eec45dd066c4a6e077140751
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5894
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Don't dereference |d| when |top| is zero. Also test that various BIGNUM
methods behave correctly on zero/even inputs.
(Imported from upstream's cf633fa00244e39eea2f2c0b623f7d5bbefa904e.)
We already had the BN_div and BN_MONT_CTX_set tests, but align them with
upstream's for consistency.
Change-Id: Ice5d04f559b4d5672e23c400637c07d8ee401727
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5783
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BN_rand generates a single-word zero BIGNUM with quite a large
probability.
A zero BIGNUM in turn will end up having a NULL |d|-buffer, which we
shouldn't dereference without checking.
(Imported from upstream's 9c989aaa749d88b63bef5d5beeb3046eae62d836.)
Change-Id: Ic4d113e4fcf4ea4c0a4e905a1c4ba3fb758d9fc6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5782
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The function BN_MONT_CTX_set was assuming that the modulus was non-zero
and therefore that |mod->top| > 0. In an error situation that may not be
the case and could cause a seg fault.
This is a follow on from CVE-2015-1794.
(Imported from upstream's 512368c9ed4d53fb230000e83071eb81bf628b22.)
The CVE itself doesn't affect us as the bit strength check in the DHE logic
excludes zero.
Also add tests to bn_test for a couple of division by zero cases. (This and
BN_div.)
Change-Id: Ibd8ef98d6be48eb95110021c23cd8e278656764d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5690
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
RSA and ECDSA will both require being able to convert ASN.1 INTEGERs to
and from DER. Don't bother handling negative BIGNUMs for now. It doesn't
seem necessary and saves bothering with two's-complement vs
sign-and-magnitude.
BUG=499653
Change-Id: I1e80052067ed528809493af73b04f82539d564ff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5268
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
bn_test's output is meant to be piped to bc, but this got broken somewhat:
- OpenSSL uses uppercase hex rather than BoringSSL's lowercase. bc only accepts
uppercase. Document that this needs some shell pipeline until we replace
them with better tests because this is all ridiculous.
- Some stderr outputs moved to stdout to avoid cluttering stdout. Just remove
them. The operations are fast enough to not need progress.
- To cut down on noise, only write the bc transcript given a command-line flag.
Also remove the -results flag since it's pointless. (It writes only the
results and not the inputs.)
Change-Id: I08f87cac1e03fab461f0dc40b9d4285bd877807d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4896
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If BN_rand is called with |bits| set to 1 and |top| set to 1 then a 1 byte
buffer overflow can occur.
See also upstream's efee575ad464bfb60bf72dcb73f9b51768f4b1a1. But rather than
making |BN_rand| fail, be consistent with the |bits| = 0 case and just don't
set the bits that don't exist. Add tests to ensure the degenerate cases behave.
Change-Id: I5e9fbe6fd8f7f7b2e011a680f2fbe6d7ed4dab65
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4893
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
inttypes.h kindly requires a feature macro in C++ on some platforms, due
to a bizarre footnote in C99 (see footnote 191 in section 7.8.1). As
bn.h is a public header, we must leak this wart to the consumer. On
platforms with unfriendly inttypes.h headers, using BN_DEC_FMT1 and
friends now require the feature macro be defined externally.
This broke the Chromium Android Clang builder:
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.linux/builders/Android%20Clang%20Builder%20%28dbg%29/builds/59288
Change-Id: I88275a6788c7babd0eae32cae86f115bfa93a591
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4688
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See upstream's a0eed48d37a4b7beea0c966caf09ad46f4a92a44. Rather than import
that, we should just ensure neg + zero isn't a possible state.
Add some tests for asc2bn and dec2bn while we're here. Also fix a bug with
dec2bn where it doesn't actually ignore trailing data as it's supposed to.
Change-Id: I2385b67b740e57020c75a247bee254085ab7ce15
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4484
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Limiting uses of crypto/bio to code that really need to it by avoiding
the use of BIO just to write to stdout/stderr.
Change-Id: I34e0f773161aeec073691e439ac353fb7b1785f3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3930
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A previous change in BoringSSL renamed ERR_print_errors_fp to
BIO_print_errors_fp as part of refactoring the code to improve the
layering of modules within BoringSSL. Rename it back for better
compatibility with code that was using the function under the original
name. Move its definition back to crypto/err using an implementation
that avoids depending on crypto/bio.
Change-Id: Iee7703bb1eb4a3d640aff6485712bea71d7c1052
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4310
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Along the way, fix a host of missing failure checks. This will save some
headache when it comes time to run these under the malloc failure tests.
Change-Id: I3fd589bd094178723398e793d6bc578884e99b67
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4126
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
