This is an initial cut at aarch64 support. I have only qemu to test it
however—hopefully hardware will be coming soon.
This also affects 32-bit ARM in that aarch64 chips can run 32-bit code
and we would like to be able to take advantage of the crypto operations
even in 32-bit mode. AES and GHASH should Just Work in this case: the
-armx.pl files can be built for either 32- or 64-bit mode based on the
flavour argument given to the Perl script.
SHA-1 and SHA-256 don't work like this however because they've never
support for multiple implementations, thus BoringSSL built for 32-bit
won't use the SHA instructions on an aarch64 chip.
No dedicated ChaCha20 or Poly1305 support yet.
Change-Id: Ib275bc4894a365c8ec7c42f4e91af6dba3bd686c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2801
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Pull constant-time methods out to a separate header, add tests.
(Imported from upstream's 9a9b0c0401cae443f115ff19921d347b20aa396b and
27739e92659d38cdefa21e51b7f52b81a7ac3388)
Change-Id: Id570f5c531aca791112929e6258989f43c8a78d7
Chromium's doesn't have built-in support for ml64.exe. Seems easier to
just build consistently with Yasm on both Win32 and Win64. (This will
require an equivalent change in Chromium's build, but keep upstream
and downstream builds consistent.)
Also don't set CMAKE_ASM_NASM_COMPILER explicitly; cmake's default
ASM_NASM behavior will search for both nasm or yasm in %PATH%. Leave
it unset so it can be overwritten on the command-line to point to
a particular yasm. Update BUILDING accordingly.
Verified the tests still pass.
Change-Id: I7e434be474b5b2d49e3bafbced5b41cc0246bd00
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2104
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Although x86masm.pl exists, upstream's documentation suggest only x86nasm.pl is
supported. Yasm seems to handle it fine with a small change.
Change-Id: Ia77be57c6b743527225924b2b398f2f07a084a7f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2092
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We were building the NASM flavor with MASM which is why it didn't work. Get the
MASM output working: cpuid and cmove are not available in MASM unless the file
declares .686. Also work around MASM rejecting a very long line in SHA-256.
The follow-up change will get the NASM flavor working. We should probably use
that one as it's documented as supported upstream. But let's make this one
functional too.
Change-Id: Ica69cc042a7250c7bc9ba9325caab597cd4ce616
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2091
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium does not like static initializers, and the CPU logic uses one to
initialize CPU bits. However, the crypto library lacks an explicit
initialization function, which could complicate (no compile-time errors)
porting existing code which uses crypto/, but not ssl/.
Add an explicit CRYPTO_library_init function, but make it a no-op by default.
It only does anything (and is required) if building with
BORINGSSL_NO_STATIC_INITIALIZER.
Change-Id: I6933bdc3447fb382b1f87c788e5b8142d6f3fe39
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1770
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Sadly this is needed by wpa_supplicant for NTLM hashes.
Change-Id: I1c362c676a11ee01f301ff6fbd33d0669396ea23
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1620
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Windows doesn't have ssize_t, sadly. There's SSIZE_T, but defining an
OPENSSL_SSIZE_T seems worse than just using an int.
Change-Id: I09bb5aa03f96da78b619e551f92ed52ce24d9f3f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1352
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Compilers have a bad habit of removing "superfluous" memset calls that
are trying to zero memory. For example, when memset()ing a buffer and
then free()ing it, the compiler might decide that the memset is
unobservable and thus can be removed.
Previously we tried to stop this by a) implementing memset in assembly
on x86 and b) putting the function in its own file for other platforms.
This change removes those tricks in favour of using asm directives to
scare the compiler away. As best as our compiler folks can tell, this is
sufficient and will continue to be so.
Change-Id: I40e0a62c3043038bafd8c63a91814a75a3c59269
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1339
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Apart from the obvious little issues, this also works around a
(seeming) libtool/linker:
a.c defines a symbol:
int kFoo;
b.c uses it:
extern int kFoo;
int f() {
return kFoo;
}
compile them:
$ gcc -c a.c
$ gcc -c b.c
and create a dummy main in order to run it, main.c:
int f();
int main() {
return f();
}
this works as expected:
$ gcc main.c a.o b.o
but, if we make an archive:
$ ar q lib.a a.o b.o
and use that:
$ gcc main.c lib.a
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64
"_kFoo", referenced from:
_f in lib.a(b.o)
(It doesn't matter what order the .o files are put into the .a)
Linux and Windows don't seem to have this problem.
nm on a.o shows that the symbol is of type "C", which is a "common symbol"[1].
Basically the linker will merge multiple common symbol definitions together.
If ones makes a.c read:
int kFoo = 0;
Then one gets a type "D" symbol - a "data section symbol" and everything works
just fine.
This might actually be a libtool bug instead of an ld bug: Looking at `xxd
lib.a | less`, the __.SYMDEF SORTED index at the beginning of the archive
doesn't contain an entry for kFoo unless initialised.
Change-Id: I4cdad9ba46e9919221c3cbd79637508959359427
Now that the consuming code in ssl/ is removed, there is no need for this.
Leave SSL_COMP and STACK_OF(SSL_COMP) for now so as not to break any code which
manipulates the output of SSL_COMP_get_compression_methods to disable
compression.
Change-Id: Idf0a5debd96589ef6e7e56acf5d9259412b7d7a1
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
