(Imported from upstream's 01c32b5e448f6d42a23ff16bdc6bb0605287fa6f.)
Change-Id: Ib52278dbbac1ed1ad5c80f0ad69e34584d411cec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7461
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
All the signature algorithm logic depends on X509_ALGOR. This also
removes the X509_ALGOR-based EVP functions which are no longer used
externally. I think those APIs were a mistake on my part. The use in
Chromium was unnecessary (and has since been removed anyway). The new
X.509 stack will want to process the signatureAlgorithm itself to be
able to enforce policies on it.
This also moves the RSA_PSS_PARAMS bits to crypto/x509 from crypto/rsa.
That struct is also tied to crypto/x509. Any new RSA-PSS code would
have to use something else anyway.
BUG=499653
Change-Id: I6c4b4573b2800a2e0f863d35df94d048864b7c41
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7025
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OpenSSL upstream did a bulk reformat. We still have some files that have
the old OpenSSL style and this makes applying patches to them more
manual, and thus more error-prone, than it should be.
This change is the result of running
util/openssl-format-source -v -c .
in the enumerated directories. A few files were in BoringSSL style and
have not been touched.
This change should be formatting only; no semantic difference.
Change-Id: I75ced2970ae22b9facb930a79798350a09c5111e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6904
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 004efdbb41f731d36bf12d251909aaa08704a756.)
The outer algorithm is already printed at the bottom of the function. This
allows any tools which print the X509 this way to determine if there is a
mismatch. This is also the point where the TBSCertificate is printed, not the
Certificate. See upstream's RT #3665.
Change-Id: I89baa4e4b626abf8813545a90eaa4409489ad893
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3022
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Since crypto/ebcdic.{c,h} are not present in BoringSSL, remove the #ifdefs
Changes were made by running
find . -type f -name *.c | xargs unifdef -m -U CHARSET_EBCDIC
find . -type f -name *.h | xargs unifdef -m -U CHARSET_EBCDIC
using unifdef 2.10.
An additional two ifdefs (CHARSET_EBCDIC_not) were removed manually.
Change-Id: Ie174bb00782cc44c63b0f9fab69619b3a9f66d42
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1093
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
